建立年度污染控制策略(CCS)评估的实际应用。

Q3 Medicine
R van der Galiën, A L Langen, L J M Jacobs, P Sawant Raschdorf, A Xing, M C van Amsterdam
{"title":"建立年度污染控制策略(CCS)评估的实际应用。","authors":"R van der Galiën, A L Langen, L J M Jacobs, P Sawant Raschdorf, A Xing, M C van Amsterdam","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) is a strategy that focuses on how to prevent contaminations with microorganisms, particles and pyrogens and manages risks to medicinal product quality and patient safety within a GMP facility. A CCS should reflect on all proactive and retrospective data within a sterile and/or aseptic and/or non-sterile manufacturing environment, to identify all sources of contamination and associated hazards and/or control measures. It should outline associated Quality Risk Assessments (QRAs), Critical Control Points (CCPs) and suggest necessary control measures. An effective way to perform QRA for CCS is adopting the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology, a proactive risk assessment tool. This tool can be ideally used to monitor all CCPs associated with various sources of contamination.To keep the CCS effective, it is highly recommended to have the CCS reviewed by a multidisciplinary team and updated periodically, and to re-review it as necessary in the event particular issues arise. An annual review of the CCS effectiveness can be performed by constructing an assessment tool in the form of a report. The report provides an overview of all proactive and retrospective Quality Management System (QMS) related data that may have an impact on the CCS. This report then acts as a tool to drive continual improvement of the manufacturing and control methods, as required per EudraLex Volume 4 GMP guidelines Annex 1. This article describes a practical application of setting up an annual CCS assessment within a pharmaceutical manufacturing company to keep the CCS effective. This assessment will facilitate the process of reviewing the effectiveness of all control measures over time and facilitates escalation of issues that are not under control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical application of setting up an annual Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) assessment.\",\"authors\":\"R van der Galiën, A L Langen, L J M Jacobs, P Sawant Raschdorf, A Xing, M C van Amsterdam\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) is a strategy that focuses on how to prevent contaminations with microorganisms, particles and pyrogens and manages risks to medicinal product quality and patient safety within a GMP facility. A CCS should reflect on all proactive and retrospective data within a sterile and/or aseptic and/or non-sterile manufacturing environment, to identify all sources of contamination and associated hazards and/or control measures. It should outline associated Quality Risk Assessments (QRAs), Critical Control Points (CCPs) and suggest necessary control measures. An effective way to perform QRA for CCS is adopting the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology, a proactive risk assessment tool. This tool can be ideally used to monitor all CCPs associated with various sources of contamination.To keep the CCS effective, it is highly recommended to have the CCS reviewed by a multidisciplinary team and updated periodically, and to re-review it as necessary in the event particular issues arise. An annual review of the CCS effectiveness can be performed by constructing an assessment tool in the form of a report. The report provides an overview of all proactive and retrospective Quality Management System (QMS) related data that may have an impact on the CCS. This report then acts as a tool to drive continual improvement of the manufacturing and control methods, as required per EudraLex Volume 4 GMP guidelines Annex 1. This article describes a practical application of setting up an annual CCS assessment within a pharmaceutical manufacturing company to keep the CCS effective. This assessment will facilitate the process of reviewing the effectiveness of all control measures over time and facilitates escalation of issues that are not under control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

污染控制策略(CCS)是一种策略,侧重于如何防止微生物、颗粒和热原污染,并管理GMP设施内药品质量和患者安全的风险。CCS应反映无菌和/或无菌和/或非无菌生产环境中的所有前瞻性和回顾性数据,以识别所有污染源和相关危害和/或控制措施。它应该概述相关的质量风险评估(QRAs)、关键控制点(ccp),并建议必要的控制措施。对CCS实施质量评估的有效方法是采用危害分析关键控制点(HACCP)方法,这是一种前瞻性的风险评估工具。该工具可以理想地用于监测与各种污染源相关的所有ccp。为了保持CCS的有效性,强烈建议由一个多学科小组对CCS进行审查并定期更新,并在出现特殊问题时必要时重新审查。可以通过构建报告形式的评估工具,对CCS的有效性进行年度审查。该报告概述了可能对CCS产生影响的所有前瞻性和回顾性质量管理体系(QMS)相关数据。根据EudraLex第4卷GMP指南附录1的要求,该报告将作为推动生产和控制方法持续改进的工具。本文介绍了在某制药企业建立年度CCS评估以保持CCS有效性的实际应用。这种评估将促进审查所有控制措施的效力的进程,并促进未得到控制的问题的升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical application of setting up an annual Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) assessment.

A Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) is a strategy that focuses on how to prevent contaminations with microorganisms, particles and pyrogens and manages risks to medicinal product quality and patient safety within a GMP facility. A CCS should reflect on all proactive and retrospective data within a sterile and/or aseptic and/or non-sterile manufacturing environment, to identify all sources of contamination and associated hazards and/or control measures. It should outline associated Quality Risk Assessments (QRAs), Critical Control Points (CCPs) and suggest necessary control measures. An effective way to perform QRA for CCS is adopting the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology, a proactive risk assessment tool. This tool can be ideally used to monitor all CCPs associated with various sources of contamination.To keep the CCS effective, it is highly recommended to have the CCS reviewed by a multidisciplinary team and updated periodically, and to re-review it as necessary in the event particular issues arise. An annual review of the CCS effectiveness can be performed by constructing an assessment tool in the form of a report. The report provides an overview of all proactive and retrospective Quality Management System (QMS) related data that may have an impact on the CCS. This report then acts as a tool to drive continual improvement of the manufacturing and control methods, as required per EudraLex Volume 4 GMP guidelines Annex 1. This article describes a practical application of setting up an annual CCS assessment within a pharmaceutical manufacturing company to keep the CCS effective. This assessment will facilitate the process of reviewing the effectiveness of all control measures over time and facilitates escalation of issues that are not under control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信