Tiffany Eatz, Yosdely Cabrera, Frank Cabrera, Mohan Kottapally, Amedeo Merenda, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Sebastian Koch
{"title":"确认神经循环骤停需要第二次经颅多普勒检查吗?","authors":"Tiffany Eatz, Yosdely Cabrera, Frank Cabrera, Mohan Kottapally, Amedeo Merenda, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Sebastian Koch","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02241-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In determining brain death, transcranial Doppler (TCD) is one of the recommended ancillary tests when clinical examinations and apnea tests are contraindicated. The American Academy of Neurology 2023 guideline updates and 2020 World Brain Death Project advise conducting two TCDs 30 min apart to diagnose neurocirculatory arrest. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a second TCD is necessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest (no flow, oscillating flow, or systolic spikes).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients admitted to intensive care units from January 1, 2021, to February 1, 2025, at a community-based academic hospital. We included patients whose first study showed neurocirculatory arrest and who subsequently underwent a confirmatory TCD at least 30 min apart. A total of 48 patients were included in our final analysis. We compared the findings of the first TCD study with those of the second study and noted any differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all 48 patients (100%), the second TCD confirmed the findings of the first TCD. Of these 48 patients, 44 patients (91.7%) had the same flow pattern on repeat TCD examination and 4 patients' (8.30%) TCDs showed different flow patterns, although still consistent with neurocirculatory arrest. Of the 44 patients with the same flow patterns found on first and repeat TCD examinations, 18 patients (40.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes; three patients (6.80%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes and oscillating flow; eight patients (18.2%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow; seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow and brief systolic spikes; one patient (2.30%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow, brief systolic spikes, and oscillating flow; and, lastly, seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate oscillating flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that requiring two sequential TCD examinations to confirm neurocirculatory arrest may be unnecessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest. Further investigation and studies such as ours in larger populations are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"467-471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is a Second Transcranial Doppler Study Needed to Confirm Neurocirculatory Arrest?\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Eatz, Yosdely Cabrera, Frank Cabrera, Mohan Kottapally, Amedeo Merenda, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Sebastian Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02241-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In determining brain death, transcranial Doppler (TCD) is one of the recommended ancillary tests when clinical examinations and apnea tests are contraindicated. The American Academy of Neurology 2023 guideline updates and 2020 World Brain Death Project advise conducting two TCDs 30 min apart to diagnose neurocirculatory arrest. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a second TCD is necessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest (no flow, oscillating flow, or systolic spikes).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients admitted to intensive care units from January 1, 2021, to February 1, 2025, at a community-based academic hospital. We included patients whose first study showed neurocirculatory arrest and who subsequently underwent a confirmatory TCD at least 30 min apart. A total of 48 patients were included in our final analysis. We compared the findings of the first TCD study with those of the second study and noted any differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all 48 patients (100%), the second TCD confirmed the findings of the first TCD. Of these 48 patients, 44 patients (91.7%) had the same flow pattern on repeat TCD examination and 4 patients' (8.30%) TCDs showed different flow patterns, although still consistent with neurocirculatory arrest. Of the 44 patients with the same flow patterns found on first and repeat TCD examinations, 18 patients (40.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes; three patients (6.80%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes and oscillating flow; eight patients (18.2%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow; seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow and brief systolic spikes; one patient (2.30%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow, brief systolic spikes, and oscillating flow; and, lastly, seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate oscillating flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that requiring two sequential TCD examinations to confirm neurocirculatory arrest may be unnecessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest. Further investigation and studies such as ours in larger populations are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"467-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02241-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02241-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is a Second Transcranial Doppler Study Needed to Confirm Neurocirculatory Arrest?
Background: In determining brain death, transcranial Doppler (TCD) is one of the recommended ancillary tests when clinical examinations and apnea tests are contraindicated. The American Academy of Neurology 2023 guideline updates and 2020 World Brain Death Project advise conducting two TCDs 30 min apart to diagnose neurocirculatory arrest. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a second TCD is necessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest (no flow, oscillating flow, or systolic spikes).
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients admitted to intensive care units from January 1, 2021, to February 1, 2025, at a community-based academic hospital. We included patients whose first study showed neurocirculatory arrest and who subsequently underwent a confirmatory TCD at least 30 min apart. A total of 48 patients were included in our final analysis. We compared the findings of the first TCD study with those of the second study and noted any differences.
Results: In all 48 patients (100%), the second TCD confirmed the findings of the first TCD. Of these 48 patients, 44 patients (91.7%) had the same flow pattern on repeat TCD examination and 4 patients' (8.30%) TCDs showed different flow patterns, although still consistent with neurocirculatory arrest. Of the 44 patients with the same flow patterns found on first and repeat TCD examinations, 18 patients (40.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes; three patients (6.80%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes and oscillating flow; eight patients (18.2%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow; seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow and brief systolic spikes; one patient (2.30%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow, brief systolic spikes, and oscillating flow; and, lastly, seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate oscillating flow.
Conclusions: We found that requiring two sequential TCD examinations to confirm neurocirculatory arrest may be unnecessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest. Further investigation and studies such as ours in larger populations are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.