妊娠期间曲马多:不良妊娠结局和主要先天性异常的风险。EFEMERIS数据库的比较研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Eva Ferrer, Laurane Delteil, Anthony Caillet, Fatiha Karam, Isabelle Lacroix
{"title":"妊娠期间曲马多:不良妊娠结局和主要先天性异常的风险。EFEMERIS数据库的比较研究。","authors":"Eva Ferrer, Laurane Delteil, Anthony Caillet, Fatiha Karam, Isabelle Lacroix","doi":"10.1002/pds.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the risk of pregnancy termination and major congenital anomalies with tramadol by comparing women exposed to tramadol during pregnancy with women exposed to codeine and unexposed women, using the French EFEMERIS database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was based on the EFEMERIS (Évaluation chez la Femme Enceinte des MÉdicaments et de leurs RISques) database, which contains reimbursed medications prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women, dates of conception and pregnancy outcome, and data on the children (congenital anomalies, neonatal diseases, etc.). Women were considered to be exposed if they were prescribed and dispensed tramadol or codeine at least once during pregnancy. Women who had a pregnancy outcome between July 1, 2004 and December 31, 2020 and living in Haute-Garonne (south-west France) were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared 1602 (1.0%) pregnancies exposed to tramadol (including 1628 fetuses/newborns due to multiple pregnancies) with 6311 (3.8%) exposed to codeine (including 6406 fetuses/newborns) and 158 426 (95.2%) unexposed to tramadol and codeine (including 160 784 fetuses/newborns). The rate of pregnancies exposed to tramadol increased sevenfold between 2004 and 2020. The study showed an increase in the rate of spontaneous pregnancy termination in women exposed to tramadol compared with women exposed to codeine (aHR [95% CI] = 2.23[1.64-3.03]) and unexposed women (aHR [95% CI] = 1.86[1.46-2.37]), after adjustment for maternal age, dispensation of folic acid, teratogenic drugs, NSAIDs, presence of hypertension, diabetes, and long-term Illness. Multivariate analysis did not show an increased rate of major congenital anomalies in fetuses/newborns exposed in utero to tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy compared with fetuses/newborns exposed to codeine (ORa [95% CI] = 1.03 [0.67-1.57]) and those not exposed to these medications (ORa [95% CI] = 1.24 [0.86-1.79]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found an association between tramadol use and the risk of spontaneous pregnancy termination. We cannot conclude that there is a causal link because of a possible indication bias. No association between prescription and dispensation of tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy and an increased risk of major congenital anomalies has been found.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tramadol During Pregnancy: Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome and Major Congenital Anomalies. A Comparative Study in the EFEMERIS Database.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Ferrer, Laurane Delteil, Anthony Caillet, Fatiha Karam, Isabelle Lacroix\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the risk of pregnancy termination and major congenital anomalies with tramadol by comparing women exposed to tramadol during pregnancy with women exposed to codeine and unexposed women, using the French EFEMERIS database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was based on the EFEMERIS (Évaluation chez la Femme Enceinte des MÉdicaments et de leurs RISques) database, which contains reimbursed medications prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women, dates of conception and pregnancy outcome, and data on the children (congenital anomalies, neonatal diseases, etc.). Women were considered to be exposed if they were prescribed and dispensed tramadol or codeine at least once during pregnancy. Women who had a pregnancy outcome between July 1, 2004 and December 31, 2020 and living in Haute-Garonne (south-west France) were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared 1602 (1.0%) pregnancies exposed to tramadol (including 1628 fetuses/newborns due to multiple pregnancies) with 6311 (3.8%) exposed to codeine (including 6406 fetuses/newborns) and 158 426 (95.2%) unexposed to tramadol and codeine (including 160 784 fetuses/newborns). The rate of pregnancies exposed to tramadol increased sevenfold between 2004 and 2020. The study showed an increase in the rate of spontaneous pregnancy termination in women exposed to tramadol compared with women exposed to codeine (aHR [95% CI] = 2.23[1.64-3.03]) and unexposed women (aHR [95% CI] = 1.86[1.46-2.37]), after adjustment for maternal age, dispensation of folic acid, teratogenic drugs, NSAIDs, presence of hypertension, diabetes, and long-term Illness. Multivariate analysis did not show an increased rate of major congenital anomalies in fetuses/newborns exposed in utero to tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy compared with fetuses/newborns exposed to codeine (ORa [95% CI] = 1.03 [0.67-1.57]) and those not exposed to these medications (ORa [95% CI] = 1.24 [0.86-1.79]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found an association between tramadol use and the risk of spontaneous pregnancy termination. We cannot conclude that there is a causal link because of a possible indication bias. No association between prescription and dispensation of tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy and an increased risk of major congenital anomalies has been found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"e70143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过比较妊娠期间曲马多暴露妇女与可待因暴露妇女和未暴露妇女,使用法国EFEMERIS数据库,评估曲马多终止妊娠和主要先天性畸形的风险。方法:该研究基于EFEMERIS (Évaluation chez la Femme Enceinte des MÉdicaments et de leurs RISques)数据库,该数据库包含孕妇处方和配发的报销药物、受孕日期和妊娠结局以及儿童数据(先天性异常、新生儿疾病等)。如果妇女在怀孕期间至少服用一次曲马多或可待因,就被认为是暴露于这种疾病。在2004年7月1日至2020年12月31日期间怀孕并居住在上加隆(法国西南部)的妇女被纳入本研究。结果:我们比较了曲马多暴露孕妇1602例(1.0%)(包括1628例因多胎妊娠所致的胎儿/新生儿)与可待因暴露孕妇6311例(3.8%)(包括6406例胎儿/新生儿)和未曲马多和可待因暴露孕妇158426例(95.2%)(包括160784例胎儿/新生儿)。2004年至2020年间,曲马多暴露孕妇的比例增加了7倍。研究显示,在调整了产妇年龄、叶酸、致畸药物、非甾体抗炎药、高血压、糖尿病和长期疾病等因素后,曲马多暴露妇女的自然终止妊娠率高于可待因暴露妇女(aHR [95% CI] = 2.23[1.64-3.03])和未暴露妇女(aHR [95% CI] = 1.86[1.46-2.37])。多变量分析未显示妊娠前三个月子宫内暴露于曲马多的胎儿/新生儿与暴露于可待因的胎儿/新生儿(ORa [95% CI] = 1.03[0.67-1.57])和未暴露于这些药物的胎儿/新生儿(ORa [95% CI] = 1.24[0.86-1.79])相比,重大先天性异常发生率增加。结论:本研究发现曲马多的使用与自然终止妊娠的风险有关。由于可能存在指征偏倚,我们不能得出因果关系的结论。在妊娠头三个月期间,曲马多的处方和配药与主要先天性异常风险增加之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tramadol During Pregnancy: Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome and Major Congenital Anomalies. A Comparative Study in the EFEMERIS Database.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the risk of pregnancy termination and major congenital anomalies with tramadol by comparing women exposed to tramadol during pregnancy with women exposed to codeine and unexposed women, using the French EFEMERIS database.

Methods: The study was based on the EFEMERIS (Évaluation chez la Femme Enceinte des MÉdicaments et de leurs RISques) database, which contains reimbursed medications prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women, dates of conception and pregnancy outcome, and data on the children (congenital anomalies, neonatal diseases, etc.). Women were considered to be exposed if they were prescribed and dispensed tramadol or codeine at least once during pregnancy. Women who had a pregnancy outcome between July 1, 2004 and December 31, 2020 and living in Haute-Garonne (south-west France) were included in this study.

Results: We compared 1602 (1.0%) pregnancies exposed to tramadol (including 1628 fetuses/newborns due to multiple pregnancies) with 6311 (3.8%) exposed to codeine (including 6406 fetuses/newborns) and 158 426 (95.2%) unexposed to tramadol and codeine (including 160 784 fetuses/newborns). The rate of pregnancies exposed to tramadol increased sevenfold between 2004 and 2020. The study showed an increase in the rate of spontaneous pregnancy termination in women exposed to tramadol compared with women exposed to codeine (aHR [95% CI] = 2.23[1.64-3.03]) and unexposed women (aHR [95% CI] = 1.86[1.46-2.37]), after adjustment for maternal age, dispensation of folic acid, teratogenic drugs, NSAIDs, presence of hypertension, diabetes, and long-term Illness. Multivariate analysis did not show an increased rate of major congenital anomalies in fetuses/newborns exposed in utero to tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy compared with fetuses/newborns exposed to codeine (ORa [95% CI] = 1.03 [0.67-1.57]) and those not exposed to these medications (ORa [95% CI] = 1.24 [0.86-1.79]).

Conclusion: This study found an association between tramadol use and the risk of spontaneous pregnancy termination. We cannot conclude that there is a causal link because of a possible indication bias. No association between prescription and dispensation of tramadol during the first trimester of pregnancy and an increased risk of major congenital anomalies has been found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信