{"title":"家长自我报告的抗癫痫药物使用和国家处方数据库中分配的处方记录之间的协议。","authors":"Emilie Willoch Olstad, Hedvig Nordeng, Marte-Helene Bjørk, Kaja Kristine Selmer, Kristina Gervin","doi":"10.1002/pds.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate measurement of medication exposure is crucial for studying the safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy. Pregnancy safety studies of ASMs frequently rely on secondary data from drug prescription registries to assess potential teratogenic effects and impact on fetal development. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between dispensed prescriptions registered in a national database and self-reported ASM use by parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was linked to the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). Participants included mothers and fathers in the MoBa-study between 2004 and 2009. Agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported use was assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity, with self-reported use as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 632 pregnant women and 42 247 fathers were included. Maternal dispensed ASM prescriptions during pregnancy showed strong overall agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use, with a sensitivity of 80.6% and specificity of 99.9%. Paternal dispensed ASM prescriptions up to 7 months prior to conception also demonstrated strong agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use. Analysis of individual ASMs revealed varying reliability: levetiracetam and lamotrigine had the highest agreement among maternal (κ = 0.92) and paternal (κ = 0.92) dispensed prescriptions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is strong agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported medication use by parents, supporting the use of prescription data for evaluating the risks of ASM use during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement Between Parental Self-Reported Antiseizure Medication Use and Dispensed Prescription Records From a National Prescription Database.\",\"authors\":\"Emilie Willoch Olstad, Hedvig Nordeng, Marte-Helene Bjørk, Kaja Kristine Selmer, Kristina Gervin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate measurement of medication exposure is crucial for studying the safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy. Pregnancy safety studies of ASMs frequently rely on secondary data from drug prescription registries to assess potential teratogenic effects and impact on fetal development. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between dispensed prescriptions registered in a national database and self-reported ASM use by parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was linked to the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). Participants included mothers and fathers in the MoBa-study between 2004 and 2009. Agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported use was assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity, with self-reported use as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 632 pregnant women and 42 247 fathers were included. Maternal dispensed ASM prescriptions during pregnancy showed strong overall agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use, with a sensitivity of 80.6% and specificity of 99.9%. Paternal dispensed ASM prescriptions up to 7 months prior to conception also demonstrated strong agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use. Analysis of individual ASMs revealed varying reliability: levetiracetam and lamotrigine had the highest agreement among maternal (κ = 0.92) and paternal (κ = 0.92) dispensed prescriptions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is strong agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported medication use by parents, supporting the use of prescription data for evaluating the risks of ASM use during pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"e70139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agreement Between Parental Self-Reported Antiseizure Medication Use and Dispensed Prescription Records From a National Prescription Database.
Purpose: Accurate measurement of medication exposure is crucial for studying the safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy. Pregnancy safety studies of ASMs frequently rely on secondary data from drug prescription registries to assess potential teratogenic effects and impact on fetal development. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between dispensed prescriptions registered in a national database and self-reported ASM use by parents.
Methods: The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was linked to the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). Participants included mothers and fathers in the MoBa-study between 2004 and 2009. Agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported use was assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa (κ), sensitivity, and specificity, with self-reported use as the reference standard.
Results: A total of 40 632 pregnant women and 42 247 fathers were included. Maternal dispensed ASM prescriptions during pregnancy showed strong overall agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use, with a sensitivity of 80.6% and specificity of 99.9%. Paternal dispensed ASM prescriptions up to 7 months prior to conception also demonstrated strong agreement (κ = 0.81) with self-reported use. Analysis of individual ASMs revealed varying reliability: levetiracetam and lamotrigine had the highest agreement among maternal (κ = 0.92) and paternal (κ = 0.92) dispensed prescriptions, respectively.
Conclusion: There is strong agreement between dispensed ASM prescriptions and self-reported medication use by parents, supporting the use of prescription data for evaluating the risks of ASM use during pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.