肝脏外科教科书预后机器学习预测模型的开发和验证:来自多中心国际队列的结果。

Jane Wang, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Taizo Hibi, Nuria Lluis, Camilla Gomes, Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Han Yin, Lucia Calthorpe, Yukiyasu Okamura, Yuta Abe, Shogo Tanaka, Minoru Tanabe, Zeniche Morise, Horacio Asbun, David Geller, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Mohamed Adam, Adnan Alseidi
{"title":"肝脏外科教科书预后机器学习预测模型的开发和验证:来自多中心国际队列的结果。","authors":"Jane Wang, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Taizo Hibi, Nuria Lluis, Camilla Gomes, Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Han Yin, Lucia Calthorpe, Yukiyasu Okamura, Yuta Abe, Shogo Tanaka, Minoru Tanabe, Zeniche Morise, Horacio Asbun, David Geller, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Mohamed Adam, Adnan Alseidi","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) using preoperative variables and (2) validate the TOLS criteria by determining whether TOLS is associated with long-term survival after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is a composite measure that combines several favorable outcomes into a single metric and represents the optimal postoperative course. Recently, an expert panel of surgeons proposed a Delphi consensus-based definition of TOLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent hepatectomies were identified from a multicenter, international cohort (2010-2022). After data preprocessing and train-test splitting (80:20), 4 models for predicting TOLS were trained and tested. Following model optimization, the performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a web-based calculator was developed. In addition, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to determine the association between TOLS and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2059 patients were included, with 62.8% meeting the criteria for TOLS. The XGBoost model, which had the best performance with an area under the curve of 0.73, was chosen for the web-based calculator. The most predictive variables for having TOLS were a minimally invasive approach, fewer lesions, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower preoperative creatinine levels, and smaller lesions. In the multivariable analysis, having TOLS was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio = 0.82, <i>P</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our ML model can predict TOLS with acceptable discrimination. We validated the TOLS criteria by demonstrating a significant association with improved OS, thus supporting their use in informing patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Wang, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Taizo Hibi, Nuria Lluis, Camilla Gomes, Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Han Yin, Lucia Calthorpe, Yukiyasu Okamura, Yuta Abe, Shogo Tanaka, Minoru Tanabe, Zeniche Morise, Horacio Asbun, David Geller, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Mohamed Adam, Adnan Alseidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) using preoperative variables and (2) validate the TOLS criteria by determining whether TOLS is associated with long-term survival after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is a composite measure that combines several favorable outcomes into a single metric and represents the optimal postoperative course. Recently, an expert panel of surgeons proposed a Delphi consensus-based definition of TOLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent hepatectomies were identified from a multicenter, international cohort (2010-2022). After data preprocessing and train-test splitting (80:20), 4 models for predicting TOLS were trained and tested. Following model optimization, the performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a web-based calculator was developed. In addition, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to determine the association between TOLS and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2059 patients were included, with 62.8% meeting the criteria for TOLS. The XGBoost model, which had the best performance with an area under the curve of 0.73, was chosen for the web-based calculator. The most predictive variables for having TOLS were a minimally invasive approach, fewer lesions, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower preoperative creatinine levels, and smaller lesions. In the multivariable analysis, having TOLS was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio = 0.82, <i>P</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our ML model can predict TOLS with acceptable discrimination. We validated the TOLS criteria by demonstrating a significant association with improved OS, thus supporting their use in informing patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在(1)开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,利用术前变量预测肝手术(TOLS)的教科书结果;(2)通过确定TOLS是否与肝切除术后的长期生存相关来验证TOLS标准。背景:教科书预后是一种综合指标,将几个有利的结果合并为一个指标,代表最佳的术后过程。最近,一个由外科医生组成的专家小组提出了基于德尔菲共识的TOLS定义。方法:从多中心国际队列(2010-2022)中确定接受肝切除术的成年患者。经过数据预处理和训练-测试分割(80:20),训练和测试了4个预测tools的模型。在模型优化之后,利用受者工作特征曲线对模型的性能进行了评价,并开发了基于web的计算器。此外,还进行了多变量Cox比例风险分析,以确定TOLS与总生存期(OS)之间的关系。结果:共纳入2059例患者,62.8%符合TOLS标准。基于web的计算器选择了XGBoost模型,其曲线下面积为0.73,性能最佳。微创入路、更少的病变、更低的Charlson合并症指数、更低的术前肌酐水平和更小的病变是进行TOLS的最具预测性的变量。在多变量分析中,TOLS与OS改善相关(风险比= 0.82,P = 0.015)。结论:我们的机器学习模型可以很好地预测TOLS。我们通过证明与改善OS的显著关联来验证TOLS标准,从而支持其在告知患者护理中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) using preoperative variables and (2) validate the TOLS criteria by determining whether TOLS is associated with long-term survival after hepatectomy.

Background: Textbook outcome is a composite measure that combines several favorable outcomes into a single metric and represents the optimal postoperative course. Recently, an expert panel of surgeons proposed a Delphi consensus-based definition of TOLS.

Methods: Adult patients who underwent hepatectomies were identified from a multicenter, international cohort (2010-2022). After data preprocessing and train-test splitting (80:20), 4 models for predicting TOLS were trained and tested. Following model optimization, the performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a web-based calculator was developed. In addition, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to determine the association between TOLS and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 2059 patients were included, with 62.8% meeting the criteria for TOLS. The XGBoost model, which had the best performance with an area under the curve of 0.73, was chosen for the web-based calculator. The most predictive variables for having TOLS were a minimally invasive approach, fewer lesions, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower preoperative creatinine levels, and smaller lesions. In the multivariable analysis, having TOLS was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = 0.015).

Conclusions: Our ML model can predict TOLS with acceptable discrimination. We validated the TOLS criteria by demonstrating a significant association with improved OS, thus supporting their use in informing patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信