Christopher R Idelson, Etse-Oghena Y Campbell, Lee M Fuentes, Simin E Golestani, Jawad T Ali, Austin Fagerberg, Aaron Laviana, John M Uecker
{"title":"一种新型的“挡风玻璃雨刷”在尸体和活猪模型的腹腔镜验证。","authors":"Christopher R Idelson, Etse-Oghena Y Campbell, Lee M Fuentes, Simin E Golestani, Jawad T Ali, Austin Fagerberg, Aaron Laviana, John M Uecker","doi":"10.1177/15533506251329635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDuring laparoscopic surgeries, laparoscopes are inserted through a trocar port into the body cavity, which is then insufflated with carbon dioxide. Laparoscope lens clarity frequently becomes compromised via condensation or smearing of blood and adipose. This problem is well-known in the field, yet a viable in vivo solution has yet to address the issue and be successfully clinically adopted.Research DesignA structured cadaveric study evaluated the cleaning performance and clinician satisfaction with a novel laparoscope lens cleaning device against 2 gold-standard lens cleaning products. The novel device was also tested in a live animal porcine model to assess cleaning performance in a warm body environment qualitatively. The validation in the porcine model did not have the same evaluation process and comparison with other lens clearing methods as the cadaveric experiment.ResultsCleaning events were timed individually and analyzed post hoc. Average times to clean scopes for the novel device, Clearify™, and Fred™ Anti-Fog solution were 5 ± 5, 16 ± 7, and 14 ± 6 seconds, respectively. In 100 cleaning events with the novel device, the laparoscope was removed from the body zero times, with an average of 2 ± 1.29 cleaning actuations per event. Clearify™ and Fred™ Anti-Fog were removed from the body 102 and 116 times, with an average number of cleaning actuations of 1.07 ± 0.26 and 1.19 ± 0.53 per event, respectively. In the live porcine model, the novel device consistently cleared all debris deposited on the lens, including fog, tissue, blood, and bile fluid.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the novel device's reduction in cleaning duration and scope removals compared to gold-standard technologies, suggesting a potential for improved workflow and reduced intra-operative interruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Novel \\\"Windshield Wiper\\\" for Laparoscopes in Cadaver and Live Porcine Models.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R Idelson, Etse-Oghena Y Campbell, Lee M Fuentes, Simin E Golestani, Jawad T Ali, Austin Fagerberg, Aaron Laviana, John M Uecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251329635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDuring laparoscopic surgeries, laparoscopes are inserted through a trocar port into the body cavity, which is then insufflated with carbon dioxide. Laparoscope lens clarity frequently becomes compromised via condensation or smearing of blood and adipose. This problem is well-known in the field, yet a viable in vivo solution has yet to address the issue and be successfully clinically adopted.Research DesignA structured cadaveric study evaluated the cleaning performance and clinician satisfaction with a novel laparoscope lens cleaning device against 2 gold-standard lens cleaning products. The novel device was also tested in a live animal porcine model to assess cleaning performance in a warm body environment qualitatively. The validation in the porcine model did not have the same evaluation process and comparison with other lens clearing methods as the cadaveric experiment.ResultsCleaning events were timed individually and analyzed post hoc. Average times to clean scopes for the novel device, Clearify™, and Fred™ Anti-Fog solution were 5 ± 5, 16 ± 7, and 14 ± 6 seconds, respectively. In 100 cleaning events with the novel device, the laparoscope was removed from the body zero times, with an average of 2 ± 1.29 cleaning actuations per event. Clearify™ and Fred™ Anti-Fog were removed from the body 102 and 116 times, with an average number of cleaning actuations of 1.07 ± 0.26 and 1.19 ± 0.53 per event, respectively. In the live porcine model, the novel device consistently cleared all debris deposited on the lens, including fog, tissue, blood, and bile fluid.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the novel device's reduction in cleaning duration and scope removals compared to gold-standard technologies, suggesting a potential for improved workflow and reduced intra-operative interruptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"345-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251329635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251329635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a Novel "Windshield Wiper" for Laparoscopes in Cadaver and Live Porcine Models.
BackgroundDuring laparoscopic surgeries, laparoscopes are inserted through a trocar port into the body cavity, which is then insufflated with carbon dioxide. Laparoscope lens clarity frequently becomes compromised via condensation or smearing of blood and adipose. This problem is well-known in the field, yet a viable in vivo solution has yet to address the issue and be successfully clinically adopted.Research DesignA structured cadaveric study evaluated the cleaning performance and clinician satisfaction with a novel laparoscope lens cleaning device against 2 gold-standard lens cleaning products. The novel device was also tested in a live animal porcine model to assess cleaning performance in a warm body environment qualitatively. The validation in the porcine model did not have the same evaluation process and comparison with other lens clearing methods as the cadaveric experiment.ResultsCleaning events were timed individually and analyzed post hoc. Average times to clean scopes for the novel device, Clearify™, and Fred™ Anti-Fog solution were 5 ± 5, 16 ± 7, and 14 ± 6 seconds, respectively. In 100 cleaning events with the novel device, the laparoscope was removed from the body zero times, with an average of 2 ± 1.29 cleaning actuations per event. Clearify™ and Fred™ Anti-Fog were removed from the body 102 and 116 times, with an average number of cleaning actuations of 1.07 ± 0.26 and 1.19 ± 0.53 per event, respectively. In the live porcine model, the novel device consistently cleared all debris deposited on the lens, including fog, tissue, blood, and bile fluid.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the novel device's reduction in cleaning duration and scope removals compared to gold-standard technologies, suggesting a potential for improved workflow and reduced intra-operative interruptions.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).