作为潜力的差异:后人类对残疾和行动能力的重新设想。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1177/13634593251329489
Barbara E Gibson, Carla Rice, Brenda M Gladstone, Julia Gray, Evadne Kelly, Donya Mosleh, Bhavnita Mistry
{"title":"作为潜力的差异:后人类对残疾和行动能力的重新设想。","authors":"Barbara E Gibson, Carla Rice, Brenda M Gladstone, Julia Gray, Evadne Kelly, Donya Mosleh, Bhavnita Mistry","doi":"10.1177/13634593251329489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on a posthuman onto-epistemology, this paper explores movements of bodies labelled-as-disabled as creative 'choreographies' that are coproduced through the coming together of multiple material, social, discursive and affective forces across time-spaces. The purpose is to challenge thinking as usual towards re-envisioning differences as potentials rather than deficits. To do so, we consider how disability can move deficit-thinking and how mobility can be put to work to rethink disability. Movement and mobility in relation to disability are frequently discussed in terms of bodily deficits and/or disabling access barriers. Deficit-thinking separates people into categories of disabled or so-called 'abled' wherein reforms are oriented to erasure of differences through providing disabled people with access to a normal/ized life. In this posthuman analysis we advance an affirmative way of thinking about differences by recursively retheorizing disability through movement and retheorizing movement through disability. To do so we present three 'mobility experiments' generated from a recent study conducted with five youth partners who identified as disabled. Within the experiments, we position creative mobilities as micro-activist becomings that suggest avenues for celebrating differences towards instigating radical change. We conclude with a discussion of posthuman disability ethics and the implications of our analysis for thinking and doing differently in healthcare and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251329489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences as potentials: A posthuman re-envisioning of disability and mobility.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara E Gibson, Carla Rice, Brenda M Gladstone, Julia Gray, Evadne Kelly, Donya Mosleh, Bhavnita Mistry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634593251329489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drawing on a posthuman onto-epistemology, this paper explores movements of bodies labelled-as-disabled as creative 'choreographies' that are coproduced through the coming together of multiple material, social, discursive and affective forces across time-spaces. The purpose is to challenge thinking as usual towards re-envisioning differences as potentials rather than deficits. To do so, we consider how disability can move deficit-thinking and how mobility can be put to work to rethink disability. Movement and mobility in relation to disability are frequently discussed in terms of bodily deficits and/or disabling access barriers. Deficit-thinking separates people into categories of disabled or so-called 'abled' wherein reforms are oriented to erasure of differences through providing disabled people with access to a normal/ized life. In this posthuman analysis we advance an affirmative way of thinking about differences by recursively retheorizing disability through movement and retheorizing movement through disability. To do so we present three 'mobility experiments' generated from a recent study conducted with five youth partners who identified as disabled. Within the experiments, we position creative mobilities as micro-activist becomings that suggest avenues for celebrating differences towards instigating radical change. We conclude with a discussion of posthuman disability ethics and the implications of our analysis for thinking and doing differently in healthcare and beyond.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634593251329489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251329489\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251329489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用后人类本体认识论,本文探讨了被标记为残疾的身体运动作为创造性的“编舞”,通过跨时空的多种物质、社会、话语和情感力量的结合共同产生。其目的是挑战惯常的思维方式,将差异重新视为潜力而非缺陷。为此,我们考虑残疾如何影响缺陷思维,以及如何将移动性用于重新思考残疾。在讨论与残疾有关的运动和活动时,人们经常从身体缺陷和/或残疾无障碍障碍的角度进行讨论。缺陷思维将人分为残疾或所谓的“有能力”的类别,其中改革旨在通过为残疾人提供正常/标准化生活的机会来消除差异。在这种后人类分析中,我们通过递归地通过运动重新理论化残疾,并通过残疾重新理论化运动,提出了一种积极的思考差异的方式。为了做到这一点,我们提出了三个“移动实验”,这些实验是由最近与五位残疾青年伙伴进行的研究产生的。在实验中,我们将创造性的移动性定位为微观活动分子,为庆祝差异而激发激进变革提供了途径。最后,我们讨论了后人类残疾伦理,以及我们的分析对医疗保健和其他领域的思考和行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences as potentials: A posthuman re-envisioning of disability and mobility.

Drawing on a posthuman onto-epistemology, this paper explores movements of bodies labelled-as-disabled as creative 'choreographies' that are coproduced through the coming together of multiple material, social, discursive and affective forces across time-spaces. The purpose is to challenge thinking as usual towards re-envisioning differences as potentials rather than deficits. To do so, we consider how disability can move deficit-thinking and how mobility can be put to work to rethink disability. Movement and mobility in relation to disability are frequently discussed in terms of bodily deficits and/or disabling access barriers. Deficit-thinking separates people into categories of disabled or so-called 'abled' wherein reforms are oriented to erasure of differences through providing disabled people with access to a normal/ized life. In this posthuman analysis we advance an affirmative way of thinking about differences by recursively retheorizing disability through movement and retheorizing movement through disability. To do so we present three 'mobility experiments' generated from a recent study conducted with five youth partners who identified as disabled. Within the experiments, we position creative mobilities as micro-activist becomings that suggest avenues for celebrating differences towards instigating radical change. We conclude with a discussion of posthuman disability ethics and the implications of our analysis for thinking and doing differently in healthcare and beyond.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信