{"title":"Which of vonoprazan alone or intravenous proton pump inhibitor followed by vonoprazan is optimal for reducing delayed bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?","authors":"Hiroko Abe, Kunio Tarasawa, Waku Hatta, Naotaro Tanno, Yutaka Hatayama, Yohei Ogata, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Tomoyuki Koike, Akira Imatani, Shin Hamada, Kenji Fujimori, Kiyohide Fushimi, Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1159/000545253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), both vonoprazan alone and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by vonoprazan have lower delayed bleeding risk than PPI alone. This study aimed to clarify an optimal acid-suppressive method in gastric ESD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study included patients who underwent gastric ESD on only vonoprazan (vonoprazan alone group) or intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan (intravenous PPI group) using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding. To balance the two comparison groups, propensity score matching (PSM), based on 18 variables, was performed; subsequently, to compare the bleeding outcome, logistic regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 63,952 patients, 24,710 pairs were compared following PSM. The delayed bleeding risk in the vonoprazan alone group was similar to that in the intravenous PPI group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.08; delayed bleeding rate, 5.9% vs. 5.9%). The results were consistent in some sensitivity and subgroup analyses; however, the result was modified by the status of antithrombotic agents (p for interaction = 0.029). In additional analyses, in patients with antithrombotic agent, the vonoprazan alone group had a higher delayed bleeding risk than the intravenous PPI group (OR, 1.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both vonoprazan alone and intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be acceptable in gastric ESD when antithrombotic agents were not administered, whereas intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be favorable in patients with antithrombotic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中,单独使用vonoprazan和静脉注射质子泵抑制剂(PPI)后再使用vonoprazan的延迟出血风险均低于单独使用PPI。本研究旨在明确胃ESD的最佳抑酸方法:这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了2014年至2021年期间使用日本诊断程序组合数据库接受胃ESD治疗的患者,这些患者仅使用了冯诺普拉赞(单用冯诺普拉赞组)或静脉注射PPI后再使用冯诺普拉赞(静脉注射PPI组)。主要结果是延迟出血。为了平衡两个比较组,根据18个变量进行了倾向得分匹配(PSM);随后,为了比较出血结果,进行了逻辑回归分析:结果:在 63952 名患者中,有 24710 对患者进行了倾向评分匹配比较。单用 vonoprazan 组与静脉注射 PPI 组的延迟出血风险相似(几率比 [OR],1.00;95% 置信区间,0.93-1.08;延迟出血率,5.9% 对 5.9%)。在一些敏感性分析和亚组分析中,结果是一致的;但是,抗血栓药物的状态改变了结果(交互作用 p = 0.029)。在其他分析中,在使用抗血栓药物的患者中,单用vonoprazan组的延迟出血风险高于静脉注射PPI组(OR,1.15):结论:在未使用抗血栓药物的情况下,单独使用 Vonoprazan 和静脉注射 PPI 后再使用 Vonoprazan 均可用于胃ESD,而静脉注射 PPI 后再使用 Vonoprazan 对使用抗血栓药物的患者有利。
Which of vonoprazan alone or intravenous proton pump inhibitor followed by vonoprazan is optimal for reducing delayed bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?
Background: In gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), both vonoprazan alone and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by vonoprazan have lower delayed bleeding risk than PPI alone. This study aimed to clarify an optimal acid-suppressive method in gastric ESD.
Methods: This population-based cohort study included patients who underwent gastric ESD on only vonoprazan (vonoprazan alone group) or intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan (intravenous PPI group) using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding. To balance the two comparison groups, propensity score matching (PSM), based on 18 variables, was performed; subsequently, to compare the bleeding outcome, logistic regression analysis was performed.
Results: Of 63,952 patients, 24,710 pairs were compared following PSM. The delayed bleeding risk in the vonoprazan alone group was similar to that in the intravenous PPI group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.08; delayed bleeding rate, 5.9% vs. 5.9%). The results were consistent in some sensitivity and subgroup analyses; however, the result was modified by the status of antithrombotic agents (p for interaction = 0.029). In additional analyses, in patients with antithrombotic agent, the vonoprazan alone group had a higher delayed bleeding risk than the intravenous PPI group (OR, 1.15).
Conclusion: Both vonoprazan alone and intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be acceptable in gastric ESD when antithrombotic agents were not administered, whereas intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be favorable in patients with antithrombotic agents.
期刊介绍:
''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.