Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen
{"title":"DNBSEQ全基因组测序检测结构变异的性能评价。","authors":"Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a \"DNBSEQ\" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an \"Illumina\" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a \\\"DNBSEQ\\\" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an \\\"Illumina\\\" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Genomics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.
Background: DNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.
Results: In this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a "DNBSEQ" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an "Illumina" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.
Conclusions: Our study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.
期刊介绍:
BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics.
BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.