法国icu的选择性去污方案:与减少感染和耐药性出现的关系

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nicolas Massart, Marc Leone, Florian Reizine, Gary Duclos, Anaïs Machut, Charles-Hervé Vacheron, Anne Savey, Emmanuelle Hammad, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape
{"title":"法国icu的选择性去污方案:与减少感染和耐药性出现的关系","authors":"Nicolas Massart, Marc Leone, Florian Reizine, Gary Duclos, Anaïs Machut, Charles-Hervé Vacheron, Anne Savey, Emmanuelle Hammad, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01465-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite randomized controlled trials with favorable results, few intensive care units (ICUs) implemented selective decontamination (SD) for ICU-acquired infection prevention. We aimed to evaluate, SD implementation and associated-effects in a large network of French ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort \"REA-REZO\" involving 193 participating ICUs. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h were included. In addition to standard of care (SOC), six ICUs applied a SD strategy during the study period. The primary endpoint was the rate of ICU-acquired infection. A propensity-score matched analysis was conducted using non-parsimonious regression model. The secondary endpoint was the rate of colonization by multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) during the ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 81,661 patients with invasive mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 h, 2727 patients receiving SD were matched with 2 727 receiving SOC. The ICU-acquired infection incidence was lower in the SD group as compared with the SOC group (Incidence Rate Ratio = 0.66 [0.60-0.73]; p < 0.001) although the ICU mortality was similar (31.9% vs 32.5%, respectively p = 0.689). Acquisition of MDRO was lower in the SD group than in the SOC group (40 (1.5%) patients vs. 139 (5.1%) patients p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results showed that a strategy of SD was associated with reduced ICU-acquired infection incidence and decreased emergence of MDRO, while the mortality was not affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective decontamination regimens in French ICUs: association with reduced infection and resistance emergence.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Massart, Marc Leone, Florian Reizine, Gary Duclos, Anaïs Machut, Charles-Hervé Vacheron, Anne Savey, Emmanuelle Hammad, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-025-01465-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite randomized controlled trials with favorable results, few intensive care units (ICUs) implemented selective decontamination (SD) for ICU-acquired infection prevention. We aimed to evaluate, SD implementation and associated-effects in a large network of French ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort \\\"REA-REZO\\\" involving 193 participating ICUs. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h were included. In addition to standard of care (SOC), six ICUs applied a SD strategy during the study period. The primary endpoint was the rate of ICU-acquired infection. A propensity-score matched analysis was conducted using non-parsimonious regression model. The secondary endpoint was the rate of colonization by multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) during the ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 81,661 patients with invasive mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 h, 2727 patients receiving SD were matched with 2 727 receiving SOC. The ICU-acquired infection incidence was lower in the SD group as compared with the SOC group (Incidence Rate Ratio = 0.66 [0.60-0.73]; p < 0.001) although the ICU mortality was similar (31.9% vs 32.5%, respectively p = 0.689). Acquisition of MDRO was lower in the SD group than in the SOC group (40 (1.5%) patients vs. 139 (5.1%) patients p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results showed that a strategy of SD was associated with reduced ICU-acquired infection incidence and decreased emergence of MDRO, while the mortality was not affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01465-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01465-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管随机对照试验取得了良好的结果,但很少有重症监护病房(icu)实施选择性去污(SD)来预防icu获得性感染。我们的目的是在法国icu的大型网络中评估SD的实施和相关效应。方法:本研究采用卫生保健相关感染监测队列“REA-REZO”进行,共纳入193名icu。所有接受有创机械通气bbbb24 h的患者均纳入研究。除了标准护理(SOC)外,6个icu在研究期间采用了SD策略。主要终点是重症监护病房获得性感染率。采用非简约回归模型进行倾向-得分匹配分析。次要终点是ICU住院期间多重耐药菌(MDRO)的定植率。结果:81661例有创机械通气时间超过24 h的患者中,SD组2727例与SOC组2727例相匹配。SD组icu获得性感染发生率低于SOC组(发生率比= 0.66 [0.60-0.73];p结论:这些结果表明,SD策略与降低icu获得性感染发生率和减少MDRO的出现有关,而死亡率不受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective decontamination regimens in French ICUs: association with reduced infection and resistance emergence.

Background: Despite randomized controlled trials with favorable results, few intensive care units (ICUs) implemented selective decontamination (SD) for ICU-acquired infection prevention. We aimed to evaluate, SD implementation and associated-effects in a large network of French ICUs.

Methods: This study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort "REA-REZO" involving 193 participating ICUs. All patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h were included. In addition to standard of care (SOC), six ICUs applied a SD strategy during the study period. The primary endpoint was the rate of ICU-acquired infection. A propensity-score matched analysis was conducted using non-parsimonious regression model. The secondary endpoint was the rate of colonization by multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) during the ICU stay.

Results: Among 81,661 patients with invasive mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 h, 2727 patients receiving SD were matched with 2 727 receiving SOC. The ICU-acquired infection incidence was lower in the SD group as compared with the SOC group (Incidence Rate Ratio = 0.66 [0.60-0.73]; p < 0.001) although the ICU mortality was similar (31.9% vs 32.5%, respectively p = 0.689). Acquisition of MDRO was lower in the SD group than in the SOC group (40 (1.5%) patients vs. 139 (5.1%) patients p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results showed that a strategy of SD was associated with reduced ICU-acquired infection incidence and decreased emergence of MDRO, while the mortality was not affected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信