Cheng Lin, Grace Xu, Rohan Dadak, Hesham Youssef, Kamal Kumar
{"title":"低剂量甲哌卡因脊柱麻醉与全身麻醉的膝关节镜手术术后恢复时间:回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究","authors":"Cheng Lin, Grace Xu, Rohan Dadak, Hesham Youssef, Kamal Kumar","doi":"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>General anesthesia (GA) is the preferred technique in ambulatory surgery because GA is associated with a predictable recovery time. However, it carries higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and drowsiness when compared with spinal anesthesia (SA). This study aimed to determine whether the recovery time in mepivacaine of 30 mg SA is noninferior when compared with GA. Our single-center retrospective study used a multivariable logistic regression to model anesthetic modality as a function of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. After screening 455 patients, 111 patients in each group were matched. SA was associated with 23.0 minutes (95% CI, -∞ to 31.0; <i>P</i> < .0001) longer recovery time, shorter operating room time (-8.0 minutes, 95% CI -13.0 to -3.0), more likely to bypass phase 1 recovery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.88) and less opioid use (-0.5 mg; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.0001) but no difference in length of stay (LOS). Spinal anesthesia was correlated with inferior recovery time. The associated phase 1 bypass and similar LOS suggest SA as a viable alternative to GA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"93 2","pages":"138-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Recovery Time After Knee Arthroscopic Surgery Using Low Dose Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Lin, Grace Xu, Rohan Dadak, Hesham Youssef, Kamal Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>General anesthesia (GA) is the preferred technique in ambulatory surgery because GA is associated with a predictable recovery time. However, it carries higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and drowsiness when compared with spinal anesthesia (SA). This study aimed to determine whether the recovery time in mepivacaine of 30 mg SA is noninferior when compared with GA. Our single-center retrospective study used a multivariable logistic regression to model anesthetic modality as a function of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. After screening 455 patients, 111 patients in each group were matched. SA was associated with 23.0 minutes (95% CI, -∞ to 31.0; <i>P</i> < .0001) longer recovery time, shorter operating room time (-8.0 minutes, 95% CI -13.0 to -3.0), more likely to bypass phase 1 recovery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.88) and less opioid use (-0.5 mg; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.0001) but no difference in length of stay (LOS). Spinal anesthesia was correlated with inferior recovery time. The associated phase 1 bypass and similar LOS suggest SA as a viable alternative to GA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AANA journal\",\"volume\":\"93 2\",\"pages\":\"138-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AANA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative Recovery Time After Knee Arthroscopic Surgery Using Low Dose Mepivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.
General anesthesia (GA) is the preferred technique in ambulatory surgery because GA is associated with a predictable recovery time. However, it carries higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and drowsiness when compared with spinal anesthesia (SA). This study aimed to determine whether the recovery time in mepivacaine of 30 mg SA is noninferior when compared with GA. Our single-center retrospective study used a multivariable logistic regression to model anesthetic modality as a function of age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. After screening 455 patients, 111 patients in each group were matched. SA was associated with 23.0 minutes (95% CI, -∞ to 31.0; P < .0001) longer recovery time, shorter operating room time (-8.0 minutes, 95% CI -13.0 to -3.0), more likely to bypass phase 1 recovery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.88) and less opioid use (-0.5 mg; 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.0001) but no difference in length of stay (LOS). Spinal anesthesia was correlated with inferior recovery time. The associated phase 1 bypass and similar LOS suggest SA as a viable alternative to GA.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.