Zhongqun Liu, Jun Niu, Yabing Guo, Ying Jia, Maolei Cui
{"title":"致密砂岩气藏CO2提高采收率机理","authors":"Zhongqun Liu, Jun Niu, Yabing Guo, Ying Jia, Maolei Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Experimental results from the Daniudi gas field enhance our understanding of mechanisms behind CO<sub>2</sub> injection for enhanced recovery from tight-sand gas reservoirs. The results reveal that the diffusion coefficients of CO<sub>2</sub> in tight reservoirs range from 10<sup>−8</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s to 10<sup>−9</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s, correlating negatively with pore pressure and positively with pore radius. In these reservoirs, CO<sub>2</sub> manifests a significantly higher adsorption capability compared to CH<sub>4</sub>, suggesting a competitive adsorption advantage. Further, the amount of adsorbed gas correlates negatively with core permeability and positively with pore pressure. In the late-stage depletion-drive development of tight-sand gas reservoirs, CO<sub>2</sub> injection alleviates water locking and enhances gas-water flow, facilitating the recovery of trapped gas. The long-core CO<sub>2</sub> flooding experiment results in a 14.11 % increase in gas recovery efficiency. The effectiveness of CO<sub>2</sub>-enhanced gas recovery (EGR) is primarily related to reservoir properties. Higher average permeability correlates with more effective CO<sub>2</sub>-EGR. Although the rate and mode of injection have limited impacts on ultimate recovery efficiency, they influence CO<sub>2</sub> breakthrough time. Specifically, a higher injection rate leads to earlier breakthrough, and the breakthrough under pulsed CO<sub>2</sub> injection occurs later than that under continuous injection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100469,"journal":{"name":"Energy Geoscience","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of CO2 enhanced gas recovery in tight-sand gas reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Zhongqun Liu, Jun Niu, Yabing Guo, Ying Jia, Maolei Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Experimental results from the Daniudi gas field enhance our understanding of mechanisms behind CO<sub>2</sub> injection for enhanced recovery from tight-sand gas reservoirs. The results reveal that the diffusion coefficients of CO<sub>2</sub> in tight reservoirs range from 10<sup>−8</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s to 10<sup>−9</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s, correlating negatively with pore pressure and positively with pore radius. In these reservoirs, CO<sub>2</sub> manifests a significantly higher adsorption capability compared to CH<sub>4</sub>, suggesting a competitive adsorption advantage. Further, the amount of adsorbed gas correlates negatively with core permeability and positively with pore pressure. In the late-stage depletion-drive development of tight-sand gas reservoirs, CO<sub>2</sub> injection alleviates water locking and enhances gas-water flow, facilitating the recovery of trapped gas. The long-core CO<sub>2</sub> flooding experiment results in a 14.11 % increase in gas recovery efficiency. The effectiveness of CO<sub>2</sub>-enhanced gas recovery (EGR) is primarily related to reservoir properties. Higher average permeability correlates with more effective CO<sub>2</sub>-EGR. Although the rate and mode of injection have limited impacts on ultimate recovery efficiency, they influence CO<sub>2</sub> breakthrough time. Specifically, a higher injection rate leads to earlier breakthrough, and the breakthrough under pulsed CO<sub>2</sub> injection occurs later than that under continuous injection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Geoscience\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666759225000149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666759225000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanisms of CO2 enhanced gas recovery in tight-sand gas reservoirs
Experimental results from the Daniudi gas field enhance our understanding of mechanisms behind CO2 injection for enhanced recovery from tight-sand gas reservoirs. The results reveal that the diffusion coefficients of CO2 in tight reservoirs range from 10−8 m2/s to 10−9 m2/s, correlating negatively with pore pressure and positively with pore radius. In these reservoirs, CO2 manifests a significantly higher adsorption capability compared to CH4, suggesting a competitive adsorption advantage. Further, the amount of adsorbed gas correlates negatively with core permeability and positively with pore pressure. In the late-stage depletion-drive development of tight-sand gas reservoirs, CO2 injection alleviates water locking and enhances gas-water flow, facilitating the recovery of trapped gas. The long-core CO2 flooding experiment results in a 14.11 % increase in gas recovery efficiency. The effectiveness of CO2-enhanced gas recovery (EGR) is primarily related to reservoir properties. Higher average permeability correlates with more effective CO2-EGR. Although the rate and mode of injection have limited impacts on ultimate recovery efficiency, they influence CO2 breakthrough time. Specifically, a higher injection rate leads to earlier breakthrough, and the breakthrough under pulsed CO2 injection occurs later than that under continuous injection.