红河流域的断裂霸权与越南实用主义

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Stew Motta , Johanna Koehler
{"title":"红河流域的断裂霸权与越南实用主义","authors":"Stew Motta ,&nbsp;Johanna Koehler","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the transboundary Red River basin, Viet Nam is the downstream country with China PRC and the Lao PDR situated upstream. The Red River has been rapidly developed with hydraulic infrastructure both in China and Viet Nam, accelerated by UNFCCC funding for dams through the Clean Development Mechanism. This rapid and simultaneous construction of dams has brought about many changes to the river in a shared basin that does not have the transboundary institutional capacity nor cooperation to jointly monitor and manage these changes. This is typically a scenario that has been found to lead to increased hydropolitical tensions and conflict. However, given the fractured hegemonic power of China as an upstream neighbor and the importance of the China relationship for Viet Nam, neither conflict nor cooperation around shared water are realistic options. Instead, Vietnamese actors are operating pragmatically in the spaces between. Experimentation in ‘what is possible’ given the asymmetric relationship is diverse, decentralized, and widespread. Distributed sensemaking by Vietnamese actors, while not able to overcome the power imbalance, does decrease gaps of uncertainty and allow for Viet Nam to enhance its ideational power of how and why change is happening in the Red River. This enhanced understanding through pragmatic sensemaking improves the knowledge and bargaining power of Viet Nam with a fractured upstream superpower.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractured hegemony and Vietnamese pragmatism in the Red River basin\",\"authors\":\"Stew Motta ,&nbsp;Johanna Koehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the transboundary Red River basin, Viet Nam is the downstream country with China PRC and the Lao PDR situated upstream. The Red River has been rapidly developed with hydraulic infrastructure both in China and Viet Nam, accelerated by UNFCCC funding for dams through the Clean Development Mechanism. This rapid and simultaneous construction of dams has brought about many changes to the river in a shared basin that does not have the transboundary institutional capacity nor cooperation to jointly monitor and manage these changes. This is typically a scenario that has been found to lead to increased hydropolitical tensions and conflict. However, given the fractured hegemonic power of China as an upstream neighbor and the importance of the China relationship for Viet Nam, neither conflict nor cooperation around shared water are realistic options. Instead, Vietnamese actors are operating pragmatically in the spaces between. Experimentation in ‘what is possible’ given the asymmetric relationship is diverse, decentralized, and widespread. Distributed sensemaking by Vietnamese actors, while not able to overcome the power imbalance, does decrease gaps of uncertainty and allow for Viet Nam to enhance its ideational power of how and why change is happening in the Red River. This enhanced understanding through pragmatic sensemaking improves the knowledge and bargaining power of Viet Nam with a fractured upstream superpower.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在跨界红河流域,越南是下游国家,中国和老挝位于上游。红河流域的水利基础设施在中国和越南都得到了迅速发展,这得益于《联合国气候变化框架公约》通过清洁发展机制为大坝提供的资金。这种快速和同步的水坝建设给共享流域的河流带来了许多变化,而这些变化既没有跨界机构能力,也没有合作来共同监测和管理这些变化。这是一种典型的情况,已被发现会导致加剧的水文政治紧张局势和冲突。然而,考虑到中国作为上游邻国的断裂霸权以及中国关系对越南的重要性,围绕共享水域的冲突或合作都不是现实的选择。相反,越南演员在两者之间的空间务实地运作。考虑到不对称关系,“什么是可能的”实验是多样化的、分散的和广泛的。越南行动者的分布式意义创造虽然无法克服权力不平衡,但确实减少了不确定性的差距,并允许越南增强其关于红河如何以及为什么发生变化的概念力量。这种通过务实的理解增进的理解提高了越南与这个分裂的上游超级大国的知识和议价能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractured hegemony and Vietnamese pragmatism in the Red River basin
In the transboundary Red River basin, Viet Nam is the downstream country with China PRC and the Lao PDR situated upstream. The Red River has been rapidly developed with hydraulic infrastructure both in China and Viet Nam, accelerated by UNFCCC funding for dams through the Clean Development Mechanism. This rapid and simultaneous construction of dams has brought about many changes to the river in a shared basin that does not have the transboundary institutional capacity nor cooperation to jointly monitor and manage these changes. This is typically a scenario that has been found to lead to increased hydropolitical tensions and conflict. However, given the fractured hegemonic power of China as an upstream neighbor and the importance of the China relationship for Viet Nam, neither conflict nor cooperation around shared water are realistic options. Instead, Vietnamese actors are operating pragmatically in the spaces between. Experimentation in ‘what is possible’ given the asymmetric relationship is diverse, decentralized, and widespread. Distributed sensemaking by Vietnamese actors, while not able to overcome the power imbalance, does decrease gaps of uncertainty and allow for Viet Nam to enhance its ideational power of how and why change is happening in the Red River. This enhanced understanding through pragmatic sensemaking improves the knowledge and bargaining power of Viet Nam with a fractured upstream superpower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信