NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400289
Anders Persson, Isam Atroshi, Thomas Tyszkiewicz, Nils P Hailer, Stergios Lazarinis, Thomas Eisler, Harald Brismar, Sebastian Mukka, Per-Juan Kernell, Maziar Mohaddes, Olof Sköldenberg, Max Gordon
{"title":"Effect of Plasma Air Purifiers on Infection Rates in Orthopedic Surgery.","authors":"Anders Persson, Isam Atroshi, Thomas Tyszkiewicz, Nils P Hailer, Stergios Lazarinis, Thomas Eisler, Harald Brismar, Sebastian Mukka, Per-Juan Kernell, Maziar Mohaddes, Olof Sköldenberg, Max Gordon","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) following orthopedic surgery impacts patient outcomes. Airborne transmission is one potential route of infection. Despite their high cost and resource demands, modern ventilation systems have shown limited efficacy in reducing SSI rates. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a low-cost air purifier in reducing SSI rates after orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a nationwide, multicenter, double-blind, cluster-randomized crossover, placebo-controlled superiority trial, we included all patients undergoing orthopedic surgery during the trial period. The intervention group underwent surgery in operating rooms with active Novaerus NV800 air purifiers, while the control group underwent surgery in operating rooms with the same air purifiers that were inactive. The primary end point was SSI within 12 weeks post surgery, defined as a postsurgery infection marker (PSIM), a custom composite outcome based on registry codes for prescribed antibiotics, diagnoses, and surgical procedures. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40,547 patients analyzed, 19,869 were in the intervention group and 20,678 in the control group. The PSIM rate was 9.2% in the invention group, and 9.4% in the control group, with an odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.05) for the intervention group. This finding remained consistent across various subgroups based on diagnoses, hospital levels, and ventilation types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In modern operating rooms equipped with standard, midrange airflow ventilation systems, the addition of wall-mounted plasma air purifiers did not reduce the PSIM rate after orthopedic surgery. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council; grant number, 2017-00198; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02695368.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 4","pages":"EVIDoa2400289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科手术后的手术部位感染(SSI)会影响患者的预后。空气传播是一种潜在的感染途径。尽管现代通风系统成本高、资源需求大,但在降低 SSI 感染率方面效果有限。本试验研究了低成本空气净化器在降低骨科手术后 SSI 感染率方面的效果:在一项全国性、多中心、双盲、分组随机交叉、安慰剂对照的优效试验中,我们纳入了试验期间所有接受骨科手术的患者。干预组在装有主动式 Novaerus NV800 空气净化器的手术室中进行手术,而对照组则在装有相同空气净化器但处于非主动状态的手术室中进行手术。主要终点是术后 12 周内的 SSI,定义为术后感染标志物 (PSIM),这是一种基于处方抗生素、诊断和手术过程登记代码的自定义复合结果。对主要结果进行了逻辑回归评估:在分析的 40547 名患者中,干预组有 19869 人,对照组有 20678 人。干预组的 PSIM 发生率为 9.2%,对照组为 9.4%,干预组的几率比为 0.98(95% 置信区间为 0.91 至 1.05)。这一结果在基于诊断、医院级别和通风类型的不同分组中保持一致:结论:在配备了标准中档气流通风系统的现代手术室中,增加壁挂式等离子空气净化器并不能降低骨科手术后的 PSIM 发生率。(由瑞典研究委员会资助;资助编号:2017-00198;ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT02695368)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Plasma Air Purifiers on Infection Rates in Orthopedic Surgery.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) following orthopedic surgery impacts patient outcomes. Airborne transmission is one potential route of infection. Despite their high cost and resource demands, modern ventilation systems have shown limited efficacy in reducing SSI rates. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a low-cost air purifier in reducing SSI rates after orthopedic surgery.

Methods: In a nationwide, multicenter, double-blind, cluster-randomized crossover, placebo-controlled superiority trial, we included all patients undergoing orthopedic surgery during the trial period. The intervention group underwent surgery in operating rooms with active Novaerus NV800 air purifiers, while the control group underwent surgery in operating rooms with the same air purifiers that were inactive. The primary end point was SSI within 12 weeks post surgery, defined as a postsurgery infection marker (PSIM), a custom composite outcome based on registry codes for prescribed antibiotics, diagnoses, and surgical procedures. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the primary outcome.

Results: Of the 40,547 patients analyzed, 19,869 were in the intervention group and 20,678 in the control group. The PSIM rate was 9.2% in the invention group, and 9.4% in the control group, with an odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.05) for the intervention group. This finding remained consistent across various subgroups based on diagnoses, hospital levels, and ventilation types.

Conclusions: In modern operating rooms equipped with standard, midrange airflow ventilation systems, the addition of wall-mounted plasma air purifiers did not reduce the PSIM rate after orthopedic surgery. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council; grant number, 2017-00198; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02695368.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信