初级保健提供者采用远程医疗对儿童眼科转诊的影响。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0489
Yeabsira Mesfin, Kieran S O'Brien, Maanasa Indaram, Jeremy D Keenan, Julius T Oatts
{"title":"初级保健提供者采用远程医疗对儿童眼科转诊的影响。","authors":"Yeabsira Mesfin, Kieran S O'Brien, Maanasa Indaram, Jeremy D Keenan, Julius T Oatts","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aims to assess how the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers influenced new patient referrals to pediatric ophthalmology. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective chart review of new pediatric ophthalmology referrals from primary care providers within the same 3 months (April, August, and December) each year between 2019 and 2021. Patient demographics, reason for referral, and recommended continued ophthalmical care (as a proxy for referral quality) were evaluated. Logistic regression models, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess the impact of telemedicine referrals. <b>Results:</b> Of the 1,181 referrals reviewed, 551 were included in the final analysis. Telemedicine use increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.005). Comparing telemedicine and in-person referrals, there was no difference in patient age, sex, race, language, or insurance type (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). A significant difference was observed between the reasons for referrals by referral type (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The most common reason for telemedicine referrals was ophthalmic manifestations of systemic diseases, while the most common reason for in-person referrals was failed vision screening. Patients with public insurance and those referred after 2020 had higher odds of recommended continued care (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.01 and 1.98, <i>p</i> = 0.002), though referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to require continued ophthalmic care (adjusted OR: 0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Pediatric ophthalmology referrals were influenced by the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers. Referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to warrant continued ophthalmic care, suggesting that the impact of telemedicine on facilitating referrals and improving access to pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty care remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"885-891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Primary Care Provider Telemedicine Adoption on Pediatric Ophthalmology Referrals.\",\"authors\":\"Yeabsira Mesfin, Kieran S O'Brien, Maanasa Indaram, Jeremy D Keenan, Julius T Oatts\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aims to assess how the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers influenced new patient referrals to pediatric ophthalmology. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective chart review of new pediatric ophthalmology referrals from primary care providers within the same 3 months (April, August, and December) each year between 2019 and 2021. Patient demographics, reason for referral, and recommended continued ophthalmical care (as a proxy for referral quality) were evaluated. Logistic regression models, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess the impact of telemedicine referrals. <b>Results:</b> Of the 1,181 referrals reviewed, 551 were included in the final analysis. Telemedicine use increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.005). Comparing telemedicine and in-person referrals, there was no difference in patient age, sex, race, language, or insurance type (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). A significant difference was observed between the reasons for referrals by referral type (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The most common reason for telemedicine referrals was ophthalmic manifestations of systemic diseases, while the most common reason for in-person referrals was failed vision screening. Patients with public insurance and those referred after 2020 had higher odds of recommended continued care (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.01 and 1.98, <i>p</i> = 0.002), though referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to require continued ophthalmic care (adjusted OR: 0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Pediatric ophthalmology referrals were influenced by the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers. Referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to warrant continued ophthalmic care, suggesting that the impact of telemedicine on facilitating referrals and improving access to pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty care remains uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"885-891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在评估初级保健提供者采用远程医疗如何影响儿童眼科的新患者转诊。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2021年每年4月、8月和12月3个月内初级保健提供者的新儿科眼科转诊病例。评估患者的人口统计学特征、转诊原因和推荐的持续眼科护理(作为转诊质量的替代指标)。采用Logistic回归模型、卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验来评估远程医疗转诊的影响。结果:在审查的1181个转诊中,551个被纳入最终分析。远程医疗的使用随着时间的推移而增加(p < 0.005)。比较远程医疗和现场转诊,患者的年龄、性别、种族、语言或保险类型没有差异(均p < 0.05)。不同转诊类型的转诊原因差异有统计学意义(p < 0.005)。远程医疗转诊最常见的原因是全身性疾病的眼部表现,而现场转诊最常见的原因是视力筛查失败。有公共保险的患者和2020年后转诊的患者推荐继续护理的几率更高(调整后的优势比[OR]: 1.67, p = 0.01和1.98,p = 0.002),尽管基于远程医疗就诊的转诊患者需要继续眼科护理的可能性较小(调整后的优势比:0.33,p = 0.001)。结论:儿童眼科转诊受到初级保健提供者采用远程医疗的影响。基于远程医疗就诊的转诊不太可能保证持续的眼科护理,这表明远程医疗对促进转诊和改善儿童眼科亚专科护理的影响仍然不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Primary Care Provider Telemedicine Adoption on Pediatric Ophthalmology Referrals.

Introduction: This study aims to assess how the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers influenced new patient referrals to pediatric ophthalmology. Methods: Retrospective chart review of new pediatric ophthalmology referrals from primary care providers within the same 3 months (April, August, and December) each year between 2019 and 2021. Patient demographics, reason for referral, and recommended continued ophthalmical care (as a proxy for referral quality) were evaluated. Logistic regression models, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess the impact of telemedicine referrals. Results: Of the 1,181 referrals reviewed, 551 were included in the final analysis. Telemedicine use increased over time (p < 0.005). Comparing telemedicine and in-person referrals, there was no difference in patient age, sex, race, language, or insurance type (all p > 0.05). A significant difference was observed between the reasons for referrals by referral type (p < 0.005). The most common reason for telemedicine referrals was ophthalmic manifestations of systemic diseases, while the most common reason for in-person referrals was failed vision screening. Patients with public insurance and those referred after 2020 had higher odds of recommended continued care (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.67, p = 0.01 and 1.98, p = 0.002), though referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to require continued ophthalmic care (adjusted OR: 0.33, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Pediatric ophthalmology referrals were influenced by the adoption of telemedicine by primary care providers. Referrals based on telemedicine visits were less likely to warrant continued ophthalmic care, suggesting that the impact of telemedicine on facilitating referrals and improving access to pediatric ophthalmology subspecialty care remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信