IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kevin Wiley, Jada Johnson, Jillian Harvey, Phillip Warr, Dunc Williams
{"title":"Measuring and Comparing Telemedicine Utilization Trends Among U.S. Hospitals.","authors":"Kevin Wiley, Jada Johnson, Jillian Harvey, Phillip Warr, Dunc Williams","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To characterize organizational and financial factors associated with hospital telemedicine utilization reporting. <b>Methods:</b> We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to quantitatively analyze hospital-level data from Medicare Cost Reports (2017-2021) and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey (AHAAS) (2020-2021) to assess telemedicine utilization reporting. Semistructured interviews were conducted with key informants from various health care sectors to contextualize quantitative findings. <b>Results:</b> Among 4,224 nonfederal acute care hospitals in our sample, most were urban (50.7%), not-for-profit (60.3%), and nonteaching hospitals (91.4%). For-profit, southern, and western hospitals were more likely to report telemedicine utilization data to the AHAAS compared to other ownership status and region categories. Qualitative interviews identified six domains that support enhanced telemedicine reporting: (1) resource and infrastructure availability, (2) organizational reporting issues, (3) survey design, (4) reconcilable vendor documentation, (5) lack of reporting requirements, and (6) lack of standardized definitions of telemedicine and telemedicine utilization. <b>Conclusions:</b> Addressing telemedicine reporting barriers is essential for accurate telemedicine utilization measurement and improved health care delivery. Future research should advance robust methodologies for capturing telemedicine utilization and explore the impact of reporting incentives and mandates on data completeness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析与医院远程医疗使用报告相关的组织和财务因素。方法我们采用了一种解释性顺序混合方法设计,对来自医疗保险成本报告(2017-2021 年)和美国医院协会年度调查(AHAAS)(2020-2021 年)的医院级数据进行定量分析,以评估远程医疗利用率报告。对来自不同医疗保健领域的关键信息提供者进行了半结构式访谈,以了解定量研究结果的来龙去脉。结果:在样本中的 4,224 家非联邦急症护理医院中,大多数是城市医院(50.7%)、非营利性医院(60.3%)和非教学医院(91.4%)。与其他所有制状况和地区类别相比,营利性医院、南部医院和西部医院更有可能向 AHAAS 报告远程医疗使用数据。定性访谈确定了支持加强远程医疗报告的六个领域:(1)资源和基础设施可用性,(2)组织报告问题,(3)调查设计,(4)可协调的供应商文档,(5)缺乏报告要求,以及(6)缺乏远程医疗和远程医疗利用的标准化定义。结论:解决远程医疗报告障碍对于准确衡量远程医疗利用率和改善医疗服务至关重要。未来的研究应推进捕捉远程医疗利用率的可靠方法,并探索报告激励和强制措施对数据完整性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring and Comparing Telemedicine Utilization Trends Among U.S. Hospitals.

Objective: To characterize organizational and financial factors associated with hospital telemedicine utilization reporting. Methods: We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to quantitatively analyze hospital-level data from Medicare Cost Reports (2017-2021) and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey (AHAAS) (2020-2021) to assess telemedicine utilization reporting. Semistructured interviews were conducted with key informants from various health care sectors to contextualize quantitative findings. Results: Among 4,224 nonfederal acute care hospitals in our sample, most were urban (50.7%), not-for-profit (60.3%), and nonteaching hospitals (91.4%). For-profit, southern, and western hospitals were more likely to report telemedicine utilization data to the AHAAS compared to other ownership status and region categories. Qualitative interviews identified six domains that support enhanced telemedicine reporting: (1) resource and infrastructure availability, (2) organizational reporting issues, (3) survey design, (4) reconcilable vendor documentation, (5) lack of reporting requirements, and (6) lack of standardized definitions of telemedicine and telemedicine utilization. Conclusions: Addressing telemedicine reporting barriers is essential for accurate telemedicine utilization measurement and improved health care delivery. Future research should advance robust methodologies for capturing telemedicine utilization and explore the impact of reporting incentives and mandates on data completeness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信