亚专科诊所基于医嘱的手术病例请求工具的实施和采用。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2564-7405
Andrew P Bain, Alyssa Low, Robert W Turer, Jonathan E Reeder, Brandon R Bruns, Derek Ngai, Christoph U Lehmann, Hongzhao Ji
{"title":"亚专科诊所基于医嘱的手术病例请求工具的实施和采用。","authors":"Andrew P Bain, Alyssa Low, Robert W Turer, Jonathan E Reeder, Brandon R Bruns, Derek Ngai, Christoph U Lehmann, Hongzhao Ji","doi":"10.1055/a-2564-7405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has become standard for medication, laboratory, referral, and imaging ordering, use in surgical case requests has not been well-described. At a large county hospital, many surgical clinics used a variety of workflows for case requests, leading to data duplication and data storage outside of the electronic health record (EHR).We hypothesized that a provider-entered order-based case request (OBCR) tool would improve data entry efficiency and provide a more comprehensive EHR audit trail.We implemented an OBCR tool across surgical clinics at a large safety-net hospital system. The existing workflow, whereby clinic managers created operative cases within the EHR after provider communication, remained available. We analyzed all cases requested via old or new workflows for 6 months after the go-live of the tool.From 2022 to 2023, managers created 7,226 operative case requests across 19 surgical clinics, 158 faculty surgeons, and 1,737 procedure combinations. Most cases (4,585, 63%) were created via OBCR. Clinic OBCR use ranged from 2 to 97% of created cases. With OBCR, case information was entered earlier, resulting in significantly increased time from case creation to scheduling, 12.0 versus 0.7 days, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Concordantly, mean time from creation to completion increased from 35.4 to 54.6 days (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Rates of \"voided cases\" decreased in the new workflow (1.9 vs. 4.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).Most surgical clinics at our institution adopted the OBCR tool, facilitating earlier operative case entry with lower void rates. This streamlined case request approach improves preoperative planning and reduces data entry redundancy. The OBCR system also enabled the data collection needed for robust reporting and identification of clinics in need of support or workflow optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"689-697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Adoption of an Order-Based Surgical Case Request Tool across Subspecialty Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew P Bain, Alyssa Low, Robert W Turer, Jonathan E Reeder, Brandon R Bruns, Derek Ngai, Christoph U Lehmann, Hongzhao Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2564-7405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has become standard for medication, laboratory, referral, and imaging ordering, use in surgical case requests has not been well-described. At a large county hospital, many surgical clinics used a variety of workflows for case requests, leading to data duplication and data storage outside of the electronic health record (EHR).We hypothesized that a provider-entered order-based case request (OBCR) tool would improve data entry efficiency and provide a more comprehensive EHR audit trail.We implemented an OBCR tool across surgical clinics at a large safety-net hospital system. The existing workflow, whereby clinic managers created operative cases within the EHR after provider communication, remained available. We analyzed all cases requested via old or new workflows for 6 months after the go-live of the tool.From 2022 to 2023, managers created 7,226 operative case requests across 19 surgical clinics, 158 faculty surgeons, and 1,737 procedure combinations. Most cases (4,585, 63%) were created via OBCR. Clinic OBCR use ranged from 2 to 97% of created cases. With OBCR, case information was entered earlier, resulting in significantly increased time from case creation to scheduling, 12.0 versus 0.7 days, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Concordantly, mean time from creation to completion increased from 35.4 to 54.6 days (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Rates of \\\"voided cases\\\" decreased in the new workflow (1.9 vs. 4.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).Most surgical clinics at our institution adopted the OBCR tool, facilitating earlier operative case entry with lower void rates. This streamlined case request approach improves preoperative planning and reduces data entry redundancy. The OBCR system also enabled the data collection needed for robust reporting and identification of clinics in need of support or workflow optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"689-697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2564-7405\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2564-7405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然计算机化的医生订单输入(CPOE)已成为药物、实验室、转诊和成像订单的标准,但在外科病例请求中的使用尚未得到很好的描述。我们的许多外科诊所使用不同的工作流程来处理病例请求,导致电子健康记录(EHR)之外的数据重复和数据存储。我们假设,提供者输入的基于订单的病例请求(OBCR)工具将提高数据输入效率,并提供更全面的EHR审计跟踪。方法在某大型安全网医院系统的外科诊所实施OBCR工具。现有的工作流程,即诊所管理人员在与供应商沟通后在电子病历中创建手术病例,仍然可用。在工具投入使用后的六个月内,通过新旧工作流程请求的所有案例都进行了分析。从2022年到2023年,管理人员在19个外科诊所、158名教员外科医生和1737种手术组合中创建了7226例手术病例。4585例(63%)通过OBCR创建。门诊使用OBCR的病例从2%到97%不等。使用OBCR,从病例创建到调度的平均时间显著增加,分别为12.0天和0.7天(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and Adoption of an Order-Based Surgical Case Request Tool across Subspecialty Clinics.

While computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has become standard for medication, laboratory, referral, and imaging ordering, use in surgical case requests has not been well-described. At a large county hospital, many surgical clinics used a variety of workflows for case requests, leading to data duplication and data storage outside of the electronic health record (EHR).We hypothesized that a provider-entered order-based case request (OBCR) tool would improve data entry efficiency and provide a more comprehensive EHR audit trail.We implemented an OBCR tool across surgical clinics at a large safety-net hospital system. The existing workflow, whereby clinic managers created operative cases within the EHR after provider communication, remained available. We analyzed all cases requested via old or new workflows for 6 months after the go-live of the tool.From 2022 to 2023, managers created 7,226 operative case requests across 19 surgical clinics, 158 faculty surgeons, and 1,737 procedure combinations. Most cases (4,585, 63%) were created via OBCR. Clinic OBCR use ranged from 2 to 97% of created cases. With OBCR, case information was entered earlier, resulting in significantly increased time from case creation to scheduling, 12.0 versus 0.7 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Concordantly, mean time from creation to completion increased from 35.4 to 54.6 days (p < 0.001). Rates of "voided cases" decreased in the new workflow (1.9 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001).Most surgical clinics at our institution adopted the OBCR tool, facilitating earlier operative case entry with lower void rates. This streamlined case request approach improves preoperative planning and reduces data entry redundancy. The OBCR system also enabled the data collection needed for robust reporting and identification of clinics in need of support or workflow optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信