Virginia Xie, Jacob Ghahremani, Tanya Watarastaporn, Michael Chapek, McKenzie Culler, Andrew Zogby, Daniel Hagaman, Aditya Manoharan, Andrew Fithian, Najeeb Khan
{"title":"早期与延迟前交叉韧带重建对胫股关节松弛的影响","authors":"Virginia Xie, Jacob Ghahremani, Tanya Watarastaporn, Michael Chapek, McKenzie Culler, Andrew Zogby, Daniel Hagaman, Aditya Manoharan, Andrew Fithian, Najeeb Khan","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. This study evaluated the impact of timing of ACLR on rates of revision, return to the operating room, and pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral laxity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, and included patients ≥ 16 years of age with no history of prior ipsilateral or contralateral knee surgery who underwent primary arthroscopic ACLR. Patients were categorized as early ACLR (< 6 months postinjury) or delayed ACLR (≥ 6 months). Pre- and postoperative manual-maximum differences (MMDs) based on KT-1000 testing and postoperative pivot shift were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 611 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 198 early ACLR and n = 413 delayed ACLR). Compared to the early ACLR group, patients receiving delayed ACLR had a lower preoperative MMD (mean 6.55 vs 7.27 mm). Postoperative MMD, as measured by a single physical therapist, was not significantly different for early vs delayed reconstruction. Logistic regression controlling for age, graft type, and postoperative laxity revealed that delayed ACLR was associated with lower odds of return to the operating room (odds ratio = 0.523, <i>P</i> = .045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delayed ACLR was associated with a lower return to the operating room and no difference in postoperative MMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Early vs Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Tibiofemoral Laxity.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Xie, Jacob Ghahremani, Tanya Watarastaporn, Michael Chapek, McKenzie Culler, Andrew Zogby, Daniel Hagaman, Aditya Manoharan, Andrew Fithian, Najeeb Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/24.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. This study evaluated the impact of timing of ACLR on rates of revision, return to the operating room, and pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral laxity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, and included patients ≥ 16 years of age with no history of prior ipsilateral or contralateral knee surgery who underwent primary arthroscopic ACLR. Patients were categorized as early ACLR (< 6 months postinjury) or delayed ACLR (≥ 6 months). Pre- and postoperative manual-maximum differences (MMDs) based on KT-1000 testing and postoperative pivot shift were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 611 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 198 early ACLR and n = 413 delayed ACLR). Compared to the early ACLR group, patients receiving delayed ACLR had a lower preoperative MMD (mean 6.55 vs 7.27 mm). Postoperative MMD, as measured by a single physical therapist, was not significantly different for early vs delayed reconstruction. Logistic regression controlling for age, graft type, and postoperative laxity revealed that delayed ACLR was associated with lower odds of return to the operating room (odds ratio = 0.523, <i>P</i> = .045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delayed ACLR was associated with a lower return to the operating room and no difference in postoperative MMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的最佳时机仍然存在争议。本研究评估了ACLR的时机对翻修率、返回手术室以及术前和术后胫股松弛度的影响。方法:从2010年1月1日至2015年12月31日进行回顾性研究,纳入年龄≥16岁,既往无同侧或对侧膝关节手术史,接受原发性关节镜下ACLR的患者。患者分为早期ACLR(损伤后< 6个月)和延迟ACLR(≥6个月)。检查术前和术后基于KT-1000测试和术后枢轴移位的手动最大差异(MMDs)。结果:611例患者符合纳入标准(早期ACLR 198例,延迟ACLR 413例)。与早期ACLR组相比,延迟ACLR患者术前MMD较低(平均6.55 vs 7.27 mm)。术后烟雾度,由单个物理治疗师测量,早期重建和延迟重建没有显著差异。控制年龄、移植物类型和术后松弛程度的Logistic回归显示,延迟ACLR与较低的返回手术室的几率相关(优势比= 0.523,P = 0.045)。结论:延迟ACLR与较低的手术返回率相关,术后烟雾无差异。
Impact of Early vs Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Tibiofemoral Laxity.
Introduction: Optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. This study evaluated the impact of timing of ACLR on rates of revision, return to the operating room, and pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral laxity.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, and included patients ≥ 16 years of age with no history of prior ipsilateral or contralateral knee surgery who underwent primary arthroscopic ACLR. Patients were categorized as early ACLR (< 6 months postinjury) or delayed ACLR (≥ 6 months). Pre- and postoperative manual-maximum differences (MMDs) based on KT-1000 testing and postoperative pivot shift were examined.
Results: A total of 611 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 198 early ACLR and n = 413 delayed ACLR). Compared to the early ACLR group, patients receiving delayed ACLR had a lower preoperative MMD (mean 6.55 vs 7.27 mm). Postoperative MMD, as measured by a single physical therapist, was not significantly different for early vs delayed reconstruction. Logistic regression controlling for age, graft type, and postoperative laxity revealed that delayed ACLR was associated with lower odds of return to the operating room (odds ratio = 0.523, P = .045).
Conclusion: Delayed ACLR was associated with a lower return to the operating room and no difference in postoperative MMD.