机械通气期间的气道安全:ICU临床医生的实践和认知调查。

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001234
Maged A Tanios, Jaqueline C Stocking, Jean G Charchaflieh, Andrew G Miller, Jay V Patel, Antonia L Vilella, Huan Mark Nguyen, Scott K Epstein, Antonio Beltran, John W Devlin
{"title":"机械通气期间的气道安全:ICU临床医生的实践和认知调查。","authors":"Maged A Tanios, Jaqueline C Stocking, Jean G Charchaflieh, Andrew G Miller, Jay V Patel, Antonia L Vilella, Huan Mark Nguyen, Scott K Epstein, Antonio Beltran, John W Devlin","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report results from a survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine to assess ICU clinicians' perceptions of artificial airway safety practices and unplanned extubation (UE) prevention. The survey was distributed between January and February 2024 and received 518 responses (68.5% response rate), with 87.5% from adult ICUs and 12.5% from Pediatric ICUs. Only 48% of adult ICU respondents tracked UE, compared with 73% tracking pressure injuries. Most respondents did not consider UE a \"never event,\" with over half viewing it as unavoidable. In adult ICUs, delirium was ranked as the highest UE risk factor, and commercial securement devices were the primary endotracheal tube securement method (75.2%). Significant variations were observed in artificial airway management practices and responsibility assignments across ICU settings. The results highlight substantial disparities in airway safety management beliefs and practices, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Safety During Mechanical Ventilation: Survey of ICU Clinicians Practices and Perceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Maged A Tanios, Jaqueline C Stocking, Jean G Charchaflieh, Andrew G Miller, Jay V Patel, Antonia L Vilella, Huan Mark Nguyen, Scott K Epstein, Antonio Beltran, John W Devlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We report results from a survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine to assess ICU clinicians' perceptions of artificial airway safety practices and unplanned extubation (UE) prevention. The survey was distributed between January and February 2024 and received 518 responses (68.5% response rate), with 87.5% from adult ICUs and 12.5% from Pediatric ICUs. Only 48% of adult ICU respondents tracked UE, compared with 73% tracking pressure injuries. Most respondents did not consider UE a \\\"never event,\\\" with over half viewing it as unavoidable. In adult ICUs, delirium was ranked as the highest UE risk factor, and commercial securement devices were the primary endotracheal tube securement method (75.2%). Significant variations were observed in artificial airway management practices and responsibility assignments across ICU settings. The results highlight substantial disparities in airway safety management beliefs and practices, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"e1234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们报告了一项对重症医学学会成员的调查结果,以评估ICU临床医生对人工气道安全实践和意外拔管(UE)预防的看法。调查于2024年1月至2月进行,共收到518份回复,回复率为68.5%,其中87.5%来自成人icu, 12.5%来自儿科icu。只有48%的ICU成人受访者追踪UE,而73%的人追踪压力性损伤。大多数受访者不认为UE是“永远不会发生的事件”,超过一半的人认为这是不可避免的。在成人icu中,谵妄被列为UE的最高危险因素,商用固定装置是主要的气管插管固定方法(75.2%)。在不同的ICU环境中,观察到人工气道管理实践和责任分配的显著差异。结果强调了气道安全管理理念和实践的巨大差异,强调了标准化、循证指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Safety During Mechanical Ventilation: Survey of ICU Clinicians Practices and Perceptions.

We report results from a survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine to assess ICU clinicians' perceptions of artificial airway safety practices and unplanned extubation (UE) prevention. The survey was distributed between January and February 2024 and received 518 responses (68.5% response rate), with 87.5% from adult ICUs and 12.5% from Pediatric ICUs. Only 48% of adult ICU respondents tracked UE, compared with 73% tracking pressure injuries. Most respondents did not consider UE a "never event," with over half viewing it as unavoidable. In adult ICUs, delirium was ranked as the highest UE risk factor, and commercial securement devices were the primary endotracheal tube securement method (75.2%). Significant variations were observed in artificial airway management practices and responsibility assignments across ICU settings. The results highlight substantial disparities in airway safety management beliefs and practices, underscoring the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信