急诊科儿科友好护理评估量表的制定:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yen-Ju Chen, Jao-Shwann Liang, Frank Leigh Lu, Chiu-Yueh Yang, Su-Fen Cheng, Chieh-Yu Liu, Chi-Wen Chen
{"title":"急诊科儿科友好护理评估量表的制定:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Yen-Ju Chen, Jao-Shwann Liang, Frank Leigh Lu, Chiu-Yueh Yang, Su-Fen Cheng, Chieh-Yu Liu, Chi-Wen Chen","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the psychometric properties of the Paediatric-Friendly Care Assessment Scale in the Emergency Department (PFCAS-ED) among clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 463 emergency nurses participated in the study between May and September 2023. The participants were randomly divided into two groups to assess the psychometric properties of the PFCAS-ED, including its reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis on data from the first group revealed six components of the PFCAS-ED: paediatric/adolescent timely care and resources, child protection mechanisms and safety, paediatric emergency care competency training and practice, paediatric emergency consultation information and space, paediatric crisis management and response, and a harmless environment and actions for toddlers. These factors explained 69.408% of the total variance and exhibited strong internal consistency. This six-factor structure and its 28 items were further validated using confirmatory factor analysis on data from the second group, yielding satisfactory fit indices and convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the scale exhibited excellent 2-week test-retest reliability and criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PFCAS-ED had excellent psychometric properties when used with clinical nurses and was proven to be a reliable instrument for evaluating emergency nurses' perceptions of the importance of providing paediatric-friendly care to children and their families.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>This standardised scale enables nurses to assess their perceptions of the importance of paediatric-friendly care and design targeted interventions on the basis of available resources. Additionally, hospital administrators can use the PFCAS-ED to identify priorities, strengths, and areas requiring improvement in paediatric emergency care, thereby informing the development of effective strategies and comprehensive policies.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Paediatric-Friendly Care Assessment Scale in Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Ju Chen, Jao-Shwann Liang, Frank Leigh Lu, Chiu-Yueh Yang, Su-Fen Cheng, Chieh-Yu Liu, Chi-Wen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the psychometric properties of the Paediatric-Friendly Care Assessment Scale in the Emergency Department (PFCAS-ED) among clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 463 emergency nurses participated in the study between May and September 2023. The participants were randomly divided into two groups to assess the psychometric properties of the PFCAS-ED, including its reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis on data from the first group revealed six components of the PFCAS-ED: paediatric/adolescent timely care and resources, child protection mechanisms and safety, paediatric emergency care competency training and practice, paediatric emergency consultation information and space, paediatric crisis management and response, and a harmless environment and actions for toddlers. These factors explained 69.408% of the total variance and exhibited strong internal consistency. This six-factor structure and its 28 items were further validated using confirmatory factor analysis on data from the second group, yielding satisfactory fit indices and convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the scale exhibited excellent 2-week test-retest reliability and criterion-related validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PFCAS-ED had excellent psychometric properties when used with clinical nurses and was proven to be a reliable instrument for evaluating emergency nurses' perceptions of the importance of providing paediatric-friendly care to children and their families.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>This standardised scale enables nurses to assess their perceptions of the importance of paediatric-friendly care and design targeted interventions on the basis of available resources. Additionally, hospital administrators can use the PFCAS-ED to identify priorities, strengths, and areas requiring improvement in paediatric emergency care, thereby informing the development of effective strategies and comprehensive policies.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证急诊科儿科友好护理评估量表(PFCAS-ED)在临床护士中的心理测量特性。设计:横断面研究。方法:2023年5 - 9月共463名急诊护士参与研究。将被试随机分为两组,分别对PFCAS-ED的信度、构念效度、收敛效度、区别效度和标准相关效度进行测评。结果:对第一组数据进行探索性因子分析,揭示了PFCAS-ED的六个组成部分:儿科/青少年及时护理与资源、儿童保护机制与安全、儿科急诊护理能力培训与实践、儿科急诊咨询信息与空间、儿科危机管理与应对、幼儿无害环境与行动。这些因素解释了总方差的69.408%,表现出较强的内部一致性。对第二组数据进行验证性因子分析,得到满意的拟合指标、收敛效度和判别效度。此外,该量表具有优异的2周重测信度和标准相关效度。结论:PFCAS-ED与临床护士一起使用时具有优异的心理测量特性,并被证明是评估急诊护士对为儿童及其家庭提供儿科友好护理重要性的认知的可靠工具。对专业和病人护理的影响:这个标准化的量表使护士能够评估他们对儿科友好护理重要性的看法,并根据现有资源设计有针对性的干预措施。此外,医院管理人员可以使用PFCAS-ED来确定儿科急诊护理的优先事项、优势和需要改进的领域,从而为制定有效战略和全面政策提供信息。报告方法:本研究遵循STROBE指南。患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Paediatric-Friendly Care Assessment Scale in Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Aim: To validate the psychometric properties of the Paediatric-Friendly Care Assessment Scale in the Emergency Department (PFCAS-ED) among clinical nurses.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Methods: A total of 463 emergency nurses participated in the study between May and September 2023. The participants were randomly divided into two groups to assess the psychometric properties of the PFCAS-ED, including its reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related validity.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis on data from the first group revealed six components of the PFCAS-ED: paediatric/adolescent timely care and resources, child protection mechanisms and safety, paediatric emergency care competency training and practice, paediatric emergency consultation information and space, paediatric crisis management and response, and a harmless environment and actions for toddlers. These factors explained 69.408% of the total variance and exhibited strong internal consistency. This six-factor structure and its 28 items were further validated using confirmatory factor analysis on data from the second group, yielding satisfactory fit indices and convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the scale exhibited excellent 2-week test-retest reliability and criterion-related validity.

Conclusion: The PFCAS-ED had excellent psychometric properties when used with clinical nurses and was proven to be a reliable instrument for evaluating emergency nurses' perceptions of the importance of providing paediatric-friendly care to children and their families.

Implications for the profession and patient care: This standardised scale enables nurses to assess their perceptions of the importance of paediatric-friendly care and design targeted interventions on the basis of available resources. Additionally, hospital administrators can use the PFCAS-ED to identify priorities, strengths, and areas requiring improvement in paediatric emergency care, thereby informing the development of effective strategies and comprehensive policies.

Reporting method: This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信