测量医院环境中的身体活动:随机对照试验的范围综述。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Christina L. Ekegren PhD , Lane Meyer DPT , Michele Callisaya PhD , Maureen C. Ashe PhD , Claire Baldwin PhD , Sze-Ee Soh PhD , Dawn C. Mackey PhD
{"title":"测量医院环境中的身体活动:随机对照试验的范围综述。","authors":"Christina L. Ekegren PhD ,&nbsp;Lane Meyer DPT ,&nbsp;Michele Callisaya PhD ,&nbsp;Maureen C. Ashe PhD ,&nbsp;Claire Baldwin PhD ,&nbsp;Sze-Ee Soh PhD ,&nbsp;Dawn C. Mackey PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify physical activity and sedentary behavior outcomes, measurement tools and protocols used, and data integrity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of hospital-based movement interventions in middle-aged and older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Scoping review of RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Adults with a mean or median age ≥50 years admitted to an acute or subacute hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were searched for RCTs published between 2000 and 2023 evaluating interventions and measuring outcomes related to movement behavior (physical activity and/or sedentary behavior) of adults during an acute or subacute inpatient admission. Data extracted included movement behavior outcomes, measurement tools/devices, measurement protocols, and the integrity of movement data. Data were reported and synthesized using frequencies/percentages and via narrative summaries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening (n = 18,018), 34 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in subacute rehabilitation (n = 13) and excluded participants with cognitive impairment (n = 27) and/or mobility impairment (n = 24). A total of 17 different movement behavior outcomes were measured, with step count measured in 22 studies. Most studies (n = 30) measured movement behaviors using a wearable device. There were 43 unique measurement devices/tools used across studies, with significant heterogeneity observed in protocols for their use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Given the substantial heterogeneity of movement behavior outcomes, and measurement tools and protocols used, there is an urgent need to develop evidence-based guidelines for measuring movement behaviors in hospital-based trials. Without this, synthesis of clinical trial outcomes and subsequent implementation of effective interventions for improving hospital-based movement behaviors will remain lacking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 6","pages":"Article 105563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Physical Activity in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Christina L. Ekegren PhD ,&nbsp;Lane Meyer DPT ,&nbsp;Michele Callisaya PhD ,&nbsp;Maureen C. Ashe PhD ,&nbsp;Claire Baldwin PhD ,&nbsp;Sze-Ee Soh PhD ,&nbsp;Dawn C. Mackey PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify physical activity and sedentary behavior outcomes, measurement tools and protocols used, and data integrity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of hospital-based movement interventions in middle-aged and older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Scoping review of RCTs.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Adults with a mean or median age ≥50 years admitted to an acute or subacute hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were searched for RCTs published between 2000 and 2023 evaluating interventions and measuring outcomes related to movement behavior (physical activity and/or sedentary behavior) of adults during an acute or subacute inpatient admission. Data extracted included movement behavior outcomes, measurement tools/devices, measurement protocols, and the integrity of movement data. Data were reported and synthesized using frequencies/percentages and via narrative summaries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening (n = 18,018), 34 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in subacute rehabilitation (n = 13) and excluded participants with cognitive impairment (n = 27) and/or mobility impairment (n = 24). A total of 17 different movement behavior outcomes were measured, with step count measured in 22 studies. Most studies (n = 30) measured movement behaviors using a wearable device. There were 43 unique measurement devices/tools used across studies, with significant heterogeneity observed in protocols for their use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Given the substantial heterogeneity of movement behavior outcomes, and measurement tools and protocols used, there is an urgent need to develop evidence-based guidelines for measuring movement behaviors in hospital-based trials. Without this, synthesis of clinical trial outcomes and subsequent implementation of effective interventions for improving hospital-based movement behaviors will remain lacking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 105563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000805\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定中老年人基于医院的运动干预的随机对照试验(rct)的身体活动和久坐行为结果、测量工具和使用方案以及数据完整性。设计:随机对照试验的范围审查。环境和参与者:在急性或亚急性医院住院的平均或中位年龄≥50岁的成年人。方法:检索2000年至2023年间发表的四个数据库的随机对照试验,评估干预措施和测量与急性或亚急性住院期间成人运动行为(身体活动和/或久坐行为)相关的结果。提取的数据包括运动行为结果、测量工具/设备、测量方案和运动数据的完整性。使用频率/百分比和叙述性摘要报告和合成数据。结果:筛选后(n = 18018),纳入34项研究。大多数研究是在亚急性康复中进行的(n = 13),排除了认知障碍(n = 27)和/或活动障碍(n = 24)的参与者。总共测量了17种不同的运动行为结果,在22项研究中测量了步数。大多数研究(n = 30)使用可穿戴设备测量运动行为。研究中使用了43种独特的测量设备/工具,在其使用方案中观察到显著的异质性。结论和意义:考虑到运动行为结果的巨大异质性,以及所使用的测量工具和协议,迫切需要制定基于证据的指导方针来测量医院试验中的运动行为。没有这一点,临床试验结果的综合和随后实施的有效干预措施,以改善医院为基础的运动行为将仍然缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Physical Activity in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives

To identify physical activity and sedentary behavior outcomes, measurement tools and protocols used, and data integrity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of hospital-based movement interventions in middle-aged and older adults.

Design

Scoping review of RCTs.

Setting and Participants

Adults with a mean or median age ≥50 years admitted to an acute or subacute hospital.

Methods

Four databases were searched for RCTs published between 2000 and 2023 evaluating interventions and measuring outcomes related to movement behavior (physical activity and/or sedentary behavior) of adults during an acute or subacute inpatient admission. Data extracted included movement behavior outcomes, measurement tools/devices, measurement protocols, and the integrity of movement data. Data were reported and synthesized using frequencies/percentages and via narrative summaries.

Results

After screening (n = 18,018), 34 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in subacute rehabilitation (n = 13) and excluded participants with cognitive impairment (n = 27) and/or mobility impairment (n = 24). A total of 17 different movement behavior outcomes were measured, with step count measured in 22 studies. Most studies (n = 30) measured movement behaviors using a wearable device. There were 43 unique measurement devices/tools used across studies, with significant heterogeneity observed in protocols for their use.

Conclusions and Implications

Given the substantial heterogeneity of movement behavior outcomes, and measurement tools and protocols used, there is an urgent need to develop evidence-based guidelines for measuring movement behaviors in hospital-based trials. Without this, synthesis of clinical trial outcomes and subsequent implementation of effective interventions for improving hospital-based movement behaviors will remain lacking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信