腰痛患者使能仪土耳其版,效度与信度研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Erkan Erol, Halime Arikan
{"title":"腰痛患者使能仪土耳其版,效度与信度研究。","authors":"Erkan Erol, Halime Arikan","doi":"10.1177/10538127251322855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov ID:</b> NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251322855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study.\",\"authors\":\"Erkan Erol, Halime Arikan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251322855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov ID:</b> NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251322855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251322855\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251322855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:唯一评估腰痛患者自我管理能力的调查是腰痛患者使能工具(PEI-BP)。目的建立土耳其语版PEI-BP量表,并对其效度和信度进行检验。方法对67例腰痛患者(女性47例,男性20例)进行研究。通过重测信度、内部一致性和可重复性测量来评估信度。通过结构效度分析、内容效度分析、面效度分析来评估效度。地板和天花板的影响进行了检查,以确保全面的评价。此外,还探讨了PEI-BP与疼痛强度、简短疾病感知问卷(BIPQ)、恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和SF-36的关系。结果PEI-BP的类内相关系数(0.795)和Cronbach’s α(0.886)均较高。模型的拟合优度值,包括拟合指标和参考范围,显示出较强的有效性。PEI-BP结果显示不存在下限和上限效应。PEI-BP与疼痛强度、BIPQ、FABQ、ODI和SF-36之间的相关性从弱到好(0.258至-0.440)。结论spei - bp具有较高的信度和效度。PEI-BP可用于评估土耳其语患者的腰痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study.

BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信