办公室职员自述颞下颌疼痛对颈部残疾的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tugba Sahbaz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Cansın Medin-Ceylan, Merve Damla Korkmaz, Hatice Kubra Asik
{"title":"办公室职员自述颞下颌疼痛对颈部残疾的影响。","authors":"Tugba Sahbaz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Cansın Medin-Ceylan, Merve Damla Korkmaz, Hatice Kubra Asik","doi":"10.1177/10538127251315829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNeck pain (NP) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain often coexist, particularly among office workers, but their interaction and impact on neck disability remain insufficiently explored.ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of self-reported TMD pain in office workers with NP and assess its impact on neck disability.MethodsThis cross-sectional survey collected data through an online questionnaire from 662 office workers (66.3% female; mean age: 35.4 ± 8.9 years) with NP. Participants were categorized into two groups: isolated NP (NP group) and coexisting NP and temporomandibular disorder pain (NP + TMD pain group). TMD diagnosis was based on the Pain Screener. Neck pain and disability were assessed using the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire (BNQ) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Parafunctional behaviors were evaluated using the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe NP + TMD pain group had significantly higher BNQ and NDI scores than the NP group (p < 0.001), indicating more severe pain and disability. Additionally, 69.1% of the NP + TMD pain group reported awake bruxism compared to 37.7% in the NP group (p < 0.001). Joint noises (80.5% vs. 6.9%) and jaw locking (30.1% vs. 1.9%) were also more frequent in the NP + TMD pain group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that high OBC scores, joint noises, and closed jaw locking were strong predictors of NP + TMD pain.ConclusionThe findings reveal significant correlations between NP and TMD pain, but the cross-sectional design limits conclusions about causation. Further longitudinal or interventional studies are needed to explore whether TMD pain contributes to NP, vice versa, or if both share common underlying mechanisms.Clinical Trials Number: NCT04900870.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251315829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of self-reported temporomandibular pain on neck disability in office workers.\",\"authors\":\"Tugba Sahbaz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Cansın Medin-Ceylan, Merve Damla Korkmaz, Hatice Kubra Asik\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251315829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundNeck pain (NP) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain often coexist, particularly among office workers, but their interaction and impact on neck disability remain insufficiently explored.ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of self-reported TMD pain in office workers with NP and assess its impact on neck disability.MethodsThis cross-sectional survey collected data through an online questionnaire from 662 office workers (66.3% female; mean age: 35.4 ± 8.9 years) with NP. Participants were categorized into two groups: isolated NP (NP group) and coexisting NP and temporomandibular disorder pain (NP + TMD pain group). TMD diagnosis was based on the Pain Screener. Neck pain and disability were assessed using the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire (BNQ) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Parafunctional behaviors were evaluated using the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe NP + TMD pain group had significantly higher BNQ and NDI scores than the NP group (p < 0.001), indicating more severe pain and disability. Additionally, 69.1% of the NP + TMD pain group reported awake bruxism compared to 37.7% in the NP group (p < 0.001). Joint noises (80.5% vs. 6.9%) and jaw locking (30.1% vs. 1.9%) were also more frequent in the NP + TMD pain group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that high OBC scores, joint noises, and closed jaw locking were strong predictors of NP + TMD pain.ConclusionThe findings reveal significant correlations between NP and TMD pain, but the cross-sectional design limits conclusions about causation. Further longitudinal or interventional studies are needed to explore whether TMD pain contributes to NP, vice versa, or if both share common underlying mechanisms.Clinical Trials Number: NCT04900870.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251315829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251315829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251315829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈部疼痛(NP)和颞下颌紊乱(TMD)疼痛经常共存,特别是在办公室工作人员中,但它们的相互作用和对颈部残疾的影响尚未得到充分的探讨。目的调查办公室工作人员NP患者自我报告的TMD疼痛的患病率,并评估其对颈部残疾的影响。方法本横断面调查通过在线问卷收集662名上班族(66.3%为女性;平均年龄:35.4±8.9岁)。将参与者分为两组:孤立性NP组(NP组)和并发NP和颞下颌紊乱性疼痛组(NP + TMD疼痛组)。TMD诊断基于疼痛筛查。使用伯恩茅斯颈部问卷(BNQ)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评估颈部疼痛和残疾。使用口腔行为检查表(OBC)评估副功能行为。统计学意义设为p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of self-reported temporomandibular pain on neck disability in office workers.

BackgroundNeck pain (NP) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain often coexist, particularly among office workers, but their interaction and impact on neck disability remain insufficiently explored.ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of self-reported TMD pain in office workers with NP and assess its impact on neck disability.MethodsThis cross-sectional survey collected data through an online questionnaire from 662 office workers (66.3% female; mean age: 35.4 ± 8.9 years) with NP. Participants were categorized into two groups: isolated NP (NP group) and coexisting NP and temporomandibular disorder pain (NP + TMD pain group). TMD diagnosis was based on the Pain Screener. Neck pain and disability were assessed using the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire (BNQ) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Parafunctional behaviors were evaluated using the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe NP + TMD pain group had significantly higher BNQ and NDI scores than the NP group (p < 0.001), indicating more severe pain and disability. Additionally, 69.1% of the NP + TMD pain group reported awake bruxism compared to 37.7% in the NP group (p < 0.001). Joint noises (80.5% vs. 6.9%) and jaw locking (30.1% vs. 1.9%) were also more frequent in the NP + TMD pain group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that high OBC scores, joint noises, and closed jaw locking were strong predictors of NP + TMD pain.ConclusionThe findings reveal significant correlations between NP and TMD pain, but the cross-sectional design limits conclusions about causation. Further longitudinal or interventional studies are needed to explore whether TMD pain contributes to NP, vice versa, or if both share common underlying mechanisms.Clinical Trials Number: NCT04900870.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信