慢性腰痛会降低中年人的平衡测试分数。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Lucinda E Bouillon, Abbey Lauver, Emma Ferdon, Thomas Schindler
{"title":"慢性腰痛会降低中年人的平衡测试分数。","authors":"Lucinda E Bouillon, Abbey Lauver, Emma Ferdon, Thomas Schindler","doi":"10.1177/10538127251328915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPeople who are middle aged are at risk for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which can impair balance. Identifying an appropriate balance test may help to detect balance deficits for this particular age group.ObjectiveTo assess balance on the dominant and non-dominant limbs among middle-aged people, (CLBP = 25 and Painfree = 25).MethodsStatic balance included the 30 s single limb stance test and dynamic balance was assessed using the modified Star Excursion Balance test (mSEBT) for anterior, posterolateral, posteromedial directions and composite score on both limbs (dominant and non-dominant) using a randomized limb and direction order for mSEBT and normalized to percent of leg length, (%LL).ResultsNo group differences were found among the SLS on either limb, (<i>p </i>> 0.05). The control group reached further anteriorly (78%LL) and with the composite (83%LL) compared to the CLBP group, (72%LL) and (75%LL), respectively. The dominant limb had longer reaches for both groups in the posterolateral and composite directions compared to non-dominant limb.ConclusionThe dynamic balance test may be more sensitive than the SLS test among individuals who are middle-aged and have CLBP. The results support that CLBP group could not reach as far in the anterior direction and composite score resulting in lower dynamic balance compared to the controls. In addition, there were inter-limb differences in both groups during the dynamic balance test which implies both limbs should be assessed among people who are middle-aged with or without chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251328915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic low back pain lowers balance test scores among people who are middle-aged.\",\"authors\":\"Lucinda E Bouillon, Abbey Lauver, Emma Ferdon, Thomas Schindler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251328915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPeople who are middle aged are at risk for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which can impair balance. Identifying an appropriate balance test may help to detect balance deficits for this particular age group.ObjectiveTo assess balance on the dominant and non-dominant limbs among middle-aged people, (CLBP = 25 and Painfree = 25).MethodsStatic balance included the 30 s single limb stance test and dynamic balance was assessed using the modified Star Excursion Balance test (mSEBT) for anterior, posterolateral, posteromedial directions and composite score on both limbs (dominant and non-dominant) using a randomized limb and direction order for mSEBT and normalized to percent of leg length, (%LL).ResultsNo group differences were found among the SLS on either limb, (<i>p </i>> 0.05). The control group reached further anteriorly (78%LL) and with the composite (83%LL) compared to the CLBP group, (72%LL) and (75%LL), respectively. The dominant limb had longer reaches for both groups in the posterolateral and composite directions compared to non-dominant limb.ConclusionThe dynamic balance test may be more sensitive than the SLS test among individuals who are middle-aged and have CLBP. The results support that CLBP group could not reach as far in the anterior direction and composite score resulting in lower dynamic balance compared to the controls. In addition, there were inter-limb differences in both groups during the dynamic balance test which implies both limbs should be assessed among people who are middle-aged with or without chronic low back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251328915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251328915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251328915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景中年人有患慢性腰痛(CLBP)的风险,这会损害平衡。确定一个适当的平衡测试可能有助于发现这个特定年龄组的平衡缺陷。目的评价中年人(CLBP = 25, Painfree = 25)主肢和非主肢的平衡性。方法静态平衡包括30 s单肢站立测试,动态平衡采用改良的星移平衡测试(mSEBT)评估前、后外侧、后内侧方向和双肢(优势和非优势)的综合得分,采用随机的肢体和方向顺序进行mSEBT测试,并标准化为腿长百分比(%LL)。结果两肢SLS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与CLBP组(72%LL)和(75%LL)相比,对照组(78%LL)和复合组(83%LL)达到了更远的前方(78%LL)。与非优势肢相比,两组优势肢在后外侧和复合方向上的伸展时间更长。结论在中年CLBP患者中,动态平衡试验可能比SLS试验更敏感。结果支持CLBP组不能到达前方向远,综合评分导致动态平衡较对照组低。此外,在动态平衡测试中,两组的肢体间存在差异,这意味着对于患有或没有慢性腰痛的中年人来说,应该对四肢进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic low back pain lowers balance test scores among people who are middle-aged.

BackgroundPeople who are middle aged are at risk for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which can impair balance. Identifying an appropriate balance test may help to detect balance deficits for this particular age group.ObjectiveTo assess balance on the dominant and non-dominant limbs among middle-aged people, (CLBP = 25 and Painfree = 25).MethodsStatic balance included the 30 s single limb stance test and dynamic balance was assessed using the modified Star Excursion Balance test (mSEBT) for anterior, posterolateral, posteromedial directions and composite score on both limbs (dominant and non-dominant) using a randomized limb and direction order for mSEBT and normalized to percent of leg length, (%LL).ResultsNo group differences were found among the SLS on either limb, (p > 0.05). The control group reached further anteriorly (78%LL) and with the composite (83%LL) compared to the CLBP group, (72%LL) and (75%LL), respectively. The dominant limb had longer reaches for both groups in the posterolateral and composite directions compared to non-dominant limb.ConclusionThe dynamic balance test may be more sensitive than the SLS test among individuals who are middle-aged and have CLBP. The results support that CLBP group could not reach as far in the anterior direction and composite score resulting in lower dynamic balance compared to the controls. In addition, there were inter-limb differences in both groups during the dynamic balance test which implies both limbs should be assessed among people who are middle-aged with or without chronic low back pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信