Antonio Piperata, Jef Van den Eynde, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Giacomo Bortolussi, Petr Fila, Tim Walter, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Jan Gofus, Bilkhu Rajdeep, Michel Pompeu Sá, Fabrizio Rosati, Manuela De la Cuesta, Elisa Gastino, Besart Cuko, Julien Ternacle, Carlo de Vincentiis, Martin Czerny, Ahmet Rüçhan Akar, Gianluca Lucchese, Basel Ramlawi, Michael A Borger, Thomas Modine
{"title":"生物假体三尖瓣置换术后的长期疗效:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Antonio Piperata, Jef Van den Eynde, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Giacomo Bortolussi, Petr Fila, Tim Walter, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Jan Gofus, Bilkhu Rajdeep, Michel Pompeu Sá, Fabrizio Rosati, Manuela De la Cuesta, Elisa Gastino, Besart Cuko, Julien Ternacle, Carlo de Vincentiis, Martin Czerny, Ahmet Rüçhan Akar, Gianluca Lucchese, Basel Ramlawi, Michael A Borger, Thomas Modine","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Long-term evidence about bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement is scarce. This study aims to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective study included patients from 10 high-volume centres in 7 different countries, who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses. Echocardiographic and clinical data were reviewed. Long-term outcomes were investigated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and competing risk analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 675 patients, isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 358 patients (53%), while 317 (47%) underwent concomitant procedures. Between these 2 groups, patients who underwent combined procedures reported a significantly higher incidence of infection, atrioventricular block, multi-organ failure, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and higher 30-day mortality over patients who underwent isolated procedure. The overall 30-day mortality occurred in 70 patients (10.4%) [46 (14.6%) combined vs 24 (6.74%) isolated, P = 0.001]. During the follow-up, there was a continuous rate of attrition due to death, with cumulative incidences of death at 5, 10 and 15 years being 27.2%, 46.2% and 60.6%, respectively. In contrast, the risk of reintervention starts to significantly increase after 10 years of follow-up, with cumulative incidences of reintervention being 6.1%, 10.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Freedom from tricuspid valve reintervention, pacemaker implantation, tricuspid valve endocarditis and major thromboembolic events at 15 years were 56.5%, 77.3%, 84.0% and 86.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses is an effective treatment for valvular disease, despite being associated with relatively high early and long-term mortality. However, the risk of structural valve degeneration rises significantly after 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Piperata, Jef Van den Eynde, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Giacomo Bortolussi, Petr Fila, Tim Walter, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Jan Gofus, Bilkhu Rajdeep, Michel Pompeu Sá, Fabrizio Rosati, Manuela De la Cuesta, Elisa Gastino, Besart Cuko, Julien Ternacle, Carlo de Vincentiis, Martin Czerny, Ahmet Rüçhan Akar, Gianluca Lucchese, Basel Ramlawi, Michael A Borger, Thomas Modine\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Long-term evidence about bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement is scarce. This study aims to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective study included patients from 10 high-volume centres in 7 different countries, who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses. Echocardiographic and clinical data were reviewed. Long-term outcomes were investigated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and competing risk analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 675 patients, isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 358 patients (53%), while 317 (47%) underwent concomitant procedures. Between these 2 groups, patients who underwent combined procedures reported a significantly higher incidence of infection, atrioventricular block, multi-organ failure, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and higher 30-day mortality over patients who underwent isolated procedure. The overall 30-day mortality occurred in 70 patients (10.4%) [46 (14.6%) combined vs 24 (6.74%) isolated, P = 0.001]. During the follow-up, there was a continuous rate of attrition due to death, with cumulative incidences of death at 5, 10 and 15 years being 27.2%, 46.2% and 60.6%, respectively. In contrast, the risk of reintervention starts to significantly increase after 10 years of follow-up, with cumulative incidences of reintervention being 6.1%, 10.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Freedom from tricuspid valve reintervention, pacemaker implantation, tricuspid valve endocarditis and major thromboembolic events at 15 years were 56.5%, 77.3%, 84.0% and 86.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses is an effective treatment for valvular disease, despite being associated with relatively high early and long-term mortality. However, the risk of structural valve degeneration rises significantly after 10 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf107\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcomes after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: a multicenter study.
Objectives: Long-term evidence about bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement is scarce. This study aims to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses.
Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included patients from 10 high-volume centres in 7 different countries, who underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses. Echocardiographic and clinical data were reviewed. Long-term outcomes were investigated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and competing risk analysis.
Results: Of 675 patients, isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 358 patients (53%), while 317 (47%) underwent concomitant procedures. Between these 2 groups, patients who underwent combined procedures reported a significantly higher incidence of infection, atrioventricular block, multi-organ failure, longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and higher 30-day mortality over patients who underwent isolated procedure. The overall 30-day mortality occurred in 70 patients (10.4%) [46 (14.6%) combined vs 24 (6.74%) isolated, P = 0.001]. During the follow-up, there was a continuous rate of attrition due to death, with cumulative incidences of death at 5, 10 and 15 years being 27.2%, 46.2% and 60.6%, respectively. In contrast, the risk of reintervention starts to significantly increase after 10 years of follow-up, with cumulative incidences of reintervention being 6.1%, 10.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Freedom from tricuspid valve reintervention, pacemaker implantation, tricuspid valve endocarditis and major thromboembolic events at 15 years were 56.5%, 77.3%, 84.0% and 86.4%, respectively.
Conclusions: Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses is an effective treatment for valvular disease, despite being associated with relatively high early and long-term mortality. However, the risk of structural valve degeneration rises significantly after 10 years.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.