强化血压控制对肾脏预后的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jia Xin Huang, Vanessa-Giselle Peschard, Elaine Ku
{"title":"强化血压控制对肾脏预后的影响。","authors":"Jia Xin Huang, Vanessa-Giselle Peschard, Elaine Ku","doi":"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hypertension has long been recognized as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, the role of intensive blood pressure (BP) control in preventing kidney disease progression continues to be debated. This review will provide a brief update on the evidence in support of or against the intensive control of BP on kidney outcomes in patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), focusing particularly on trial-grade evidence.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recently, three large trials conducted in China compared the effects of intensive BP control in adults with cardiovascular risk factors. All three trials demonstrated that intensive BP control confers cardiovascular benefits, but mixed results were noted in terms of the risk of adverse kidney outcomes. In individual-level meta-analyses of six trials of different BP control strategies in patients with CKD, intensive BP control appeared to reduce the risk of kidney replacement therapy in those with CKD stage 4-5, but not in patients with CKD stage 3.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Most guidelines continue to recommend a systolic BP target of 120-130 mmHg for patients with CKD given the cardiovascular benefits observed in trials of intensive BP control, though there are some signals of potential risks to the kidney with this BP treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10960,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intensive blood pressure control on kidney outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Xin Huang, Vanessa-Giselle Peschard, Elaine Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hypertension has long been recognized as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, the role of intensive blood pressure (BP) control in preventing kidney disease progression continues to be debated. This review will provide a brief update on the evidence in support of or against the intensive control of BP on kidney outcomes in patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), focusing particularly on trial-grade evidence.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recently, three large trials conducted in China compared the effects of intensive BP control in adults with cardiovascular risk factors. All three trials demonstrated that intensive BP control confers cardiovascular benefits, but mixed results were noted in terms of the risk of adverse kidney outcomes. In individual-level meta-analyses of six trials of different BP control strategies in patients with CKD, intensive BP control appeared to reduce the risk of kidney replacement therapy in those with CKD stage 4-5, but not in patients with CKD stage 3.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Most guidelines continue to recommend a systolic BP target of 120-130 mmHg for patients with CKD given the cardiovascular benefits observed in trials of intensive BP control, though there are some signals of potential risks to the kidney with this BP treatment strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"224-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:高血压一直被认为是心血管事件的可改变危险因素。然而,强化血压(BP)控制在预防肾脏疾病进展中的作用仍存在争议。本综述将简要介绍支持或反对强化血压控制对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者肾脏预后影响的最新证据,尤其侧重于试验级证据。最近的发现:最近,在中国进行的三个大型试验比较了强化血压控制对心血管危险因素的成年人的影响。所有三项试验都表明,强化血压控制对心血管有益,但在肾脏不良结局的风险方面,结果好坏参半。在对CKD患者不同血压控制策略的六项试验的个体水平荟萃分析中,强化血压控制似乎可以降低CKD 4-5期患者肾脏替代治疗的风险,但在CKD 3期患者中没有。总结:大多数指南继续推荐CKD患者的收缩压目标为120-130 mmHg,因为在强化血压控制的试验中观察到心血管方面的益处,尽管有一些信号表明这种血压治疗策略对肾脏有潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of intensive blood pressure control on kidney outcomes.

Purpose of review: Hypertension has long been recognized as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, the role of intensive blood pressure (BP) control in preventing kidney disease progression continues to be debated. This review will provide a brief update on the evidence in support of or against the intensive control of BP on kidney outcomes in patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), focusing particularly on trial-grade evidence.

Recent findings: Recently, three large trials conducted in China compared the effects of intensive BP control in adults with cardiovascular risk factors. All three trials demonstrated that intensive BP control confers cardiovascular benefits, but mixed results were noted in terms of the risk of adverse kidney outcomes. In individual-level meta-analyses of six trials of different BP control strategies in patients with CKD, intensive BP control appeared to reduce the risk of kidney replacement therapy in those with CKD stage 4-5, but not in patients with CKD stage 3.

Summary: Most guidelines continue to recommend a systolic BP target of 120-130 mmHg for patients with CKD given the cardiovascular benefits observed in trials of intensive BP control, though there are some signals of potential risks to the kidney with this BP treatment strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of nephrology and hypertension. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including pathophysiology of hypertension, circulation and hemodynamics, and clinical nephrology. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信