COVID-19大流行期间患者和提供者对视频和电话远程卫生保健的态度:系统综述

IF 6.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Samantha L Connolly, Sierra D Ferris, Robert P Azario, Christopher J Miller
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间患者和提供者对视频和电话远程卫生保健的态度:系统综述","authors":"Samantha L Connolly, Sierra D Ferris, Robert P Azario, Christopher J Miller","doi":"10.1037/cps0000226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review synthesizes findings from studies reporting on patient and provider attitudes toward telemental health care conducted via both video and phone. It is informed by the Technology Acceptance Model, in that it reports on patient and provider ratings of the effectiveness of video and phone care, ease of use, overall satisfaction with the modalities, and future modality preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of the English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between 2013 and 2023 within PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Psychology Database, and PsycInfo. 181 studies met full-text review criteria and 24 studies were ultimately included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings were mixed, such that some studies reported similar attitudes toward video and phone care, some favored video care, and relatively few studies favored phone. When considering provider and patient findings separately, providers more strongly favored video over phone with regard to effectiveness, overall satisfaction, and preference for future use. Studies of patients varied between favoring video and reporting nonsignificant differences between the two modalities. Patients tended to prefer the modality they were currently using. Both patients and providers rated video as more complex than phone in several studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Providers rated video more positively than phone across the majority of included domains, while patient attitudes were more variable. Findings must be interpreted with caution as there is a risk of selection bias across all studies. Future reviews of qualitative studies will be important to provide a more nuanced understanding of patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10434,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","volume":"31 4","pages":"488-503"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L Connolly, Sierra D Ferris, Robert P Azario, Christopher J Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cps0000226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review synthesizes findings from studies reporting on patient and provider attitudes toward telemental health care conducted via both video and phone. It is informed by the Technology Acceptance Model, in that it reports on patient and provider ratings of the effectiveness of video and phone care, ease of use, overall satisfaction with the modalities, and future modality preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of the English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between 2013 and 2023 within PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Psychology Database, and PsycInfo. 181 studies met full-text review criteria and 24 studies were ultimately included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings were mixed, such that some studies reported similar attitudes toward video and phone care, some favored video care, and relatively few studies favored phone. When considering provider and patient findings separately, providers more strongly favored video over phone with regard to effectiveness, overall satisfaction, and preference for future use. Studies of patients varied between favoring video and reporting nonsignificant differences between the two modalities. Patients tended to prefer the modality they were currently using. Both patients and providers rated video as more complex than phone in several studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Providers rated video more positively than phone across the majority of included domains, while patient attitudes were more variable. Findings must be interpreted with caution as there is a risk of selection bias across all studies. Future reviews of qualitative studies will be important to provide a more nuanced understanding of patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"488-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931715/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000226\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology-science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述综合了通过视频和电话进行的关于患者和提供者对远程精神卫生保健的态度的研究报告的结果。它由技术接受模型提供信息,因为它报告了患者和提供者对视频和电话护理的有效性,易用性,对模式的总体满意度以及未来模式偏好的评级。方法:对PubMed、Embase、ProQuest心理学数据库和PsycInfo数据库中2013 - 2023年间发表的同行评议的英文文献进行系统综述。181项研究符合全文审查标准,最终纳入24项研究。结果:研究结果是混合的,一些研究报告了对视频和电话护理的相似态度,一些研究倾向于视频护理,而相对较少的研究倾向于电话护理。当分别考虑提供者和患者的发现时,提供者在有效性、总体满意度和对未来使用的偏好方面更强烈地倾向于视频而不是电话。对患者的研究在支持视频和报告两种方式之间无显著差异之间存在差异。患者往往更喜欢他们目前使用的方式。在几项研究中,患者和医生都认为视频比电话更复杂。讨论:在大多数包括的领域中,提供者对视频的评价比电话更积极,而患者的态度则变化更大。研究结果必须谨慎解释,因为所有研究都存在选择偏倚的风险。未来对定性研究的回顾对于更细致地了解患者和提供者对视频和电话远程心理保健的态度将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Objective: This review synthesizes findings from studies reporting on patient and provider attitudes toward telemental health care conducted via both video and phone. It is informed by the Technology Acceptance Model, in that it reports on patient and provider ratings of the effectiveness of video and phone care, ease of use, overall satisfaction with the modalities, and future modality preference.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of the English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between 2013 and 2023 within PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Psychology Database, and PsycInfo. 181 studies met full-text review criteria and 24 studies were ultimately included.

Results: Findings were mixed, such that some studies reported similar attitudes toward video and phone care, some favored video care, and relatively few studies favored phone. When considering provider and patient findings separately, providers more strongly favored video over phone with regard to effectiveness, overall satisfaction, and preference for future use. Studies of patients varied between favoring video and reporting nonsignificant differences between the two modalities. Patients tended to prefer the modality they were currently using. Both patients and providers rated video as more complex than phone in several studies.

Discussion: Providers rated video more positively than phone across the majority of included domains, while patient attitudes were more variable. Findings must be interpreted with caution as there is a risk of selection bias across all studies. Future reviews of qualitative studies will be important to provide a more nuanced understanding of patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice presents cutting-edge developments in the science and practice of clinical psychology and related mental health fields by publishing scholarly articles, primarily involving narrative and systematic reviews as well as meta-analyses related to assessment, intervention, and service delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信