新型小直径全方位安全除颤导联的传感和检测性能:LEADR试验的深入分析

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf062
Prashanthan Sanders, Pamela K Mason, Bert Hansky, Paolo De Filippo, Maully J Shah, Darius P Sholevar, John S Zakaib, Francois Philippon, Bernice Tsang, Rajeev K Pathak, Travis D Richardson, Meir Friedman, Robert D Schaller, Ignasi Anguera, Attila Mihalcz, Babak Bozorgnia, Amy E Thompson, Katherin Arias, Baerbel Maus, Chad Bounds, George H Crossley
{"title":"新型小直径全方位安全除颤导联的传感和检测性能:LEADR试验的深入分析","authors":"Prashanthan Sanders, Pamela K Mason, Bert Hansky, Paolo De Filippo, Maully J Shah, Darius P Sholevar, John S Zakaib, Francois Philippon, Bernice Tsang, Rajeev K Pathak, Travis D Richardson, Meir Friedman, Robert D Schaller, Ignasi Anguera, Attila Mihalcz, Babak Bozorgnia, Amy E Thompson, Katherin Arias, Baerbel Maus, Chad Bounds, George H Crossley","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Lead EvaluAtion for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) trial evaluated the small-diameter (4.7 Fr), integrated bipolar OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. As previously reported, the trial exceeded primary safety and efficacy objective thresholds, demonstrating favourable performance and zero fractures through ∼12 months follow-up, with patients in ongoing follow-up. Longer-term follow-up of the LEADR trial with emphasis on the sensing and detection capabilities of the OmniaSecure lead is reported here.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with indications for de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators/cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators were implanted with the OmniaSecure lead in standard right ventricle (RV) locations and followed at pre-specified intervals along with CareLink™ remote monitoring transmissions, where available. Throughout follow-up, the lead was evaluated for safety, efficacy, and reliability along with sensing and detection performance. There were 643/657 (97.9%) patients successfully implanted with the OmniaSecure lead with mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 5.5 months. There was a 96.9% freedom from major study lead-related complications at 24 months. Inappropriate shock rate was 2.7 and 3.8% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, 17.6% of patients received appropriate therapies (shock and/or ATP) with a 76.5% ATP efficacy. There have been zero fractures during follow-up along with chronically stable pacing capture threshold, pacing impedance, and R-wave amplitudes. There were four patients with an adverse event related to PWOS (0.6%), none of which was associated with inappropriate shock. There were four patients with an adverse event related to TWOS (0.6%), of which three patients were associated with inappropriate shock (0.5%). Oversensing was resolved predominantly by programming the RV sensitivity to less sensitive settings. During VF induction at implant, 97.6% (120/123) of patients showed appropriate VF episode detection at the least sensitive setting of 1.2 mV, with the remaining having detection at more sensitive settings. In follow-up, 670 VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected and treated in 94 patients with a variety of RV sensitivities and no reports of under-detected episodes. Moreover, a virtual sensitivity analysis also showed no under-detection across different RV sensitivity programming.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic sensing performance of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead demonstrated R-wave stability with a low rate of P-wave and T-wave oversensing, resolved predominantly by adjusting RV sensitivity. Further, VT/VF detection was successful and was not impacted when programmed to less sensitive settings. The OmniaSecure lead shows robust sensing and detection performance and programmability in ongoing follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensing and detection performance of the novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead: in-depth analysis from the LEADR trial.\",\"authors\":\"Prashanthan Sanders, Pamela K Mason, Bert Hansky, Paolo De Filippo, Maully J Shah, Darius P Sholevar, John S Zakaib, Francois Philippon, Bernice Tsang, Rajeev K Pathak, Travis D Richardson, Meir Friedman, Robert D Schaller, Ignasi Anguera, Attila Mihalcz, Babak Bozorgnia, Amy E Thompson, Katherin Arias, Baerbel Maus, Chad Bounds, George H Crossley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euaf062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Lead EvaluAtion for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) trial evaluated the small-diameter (4.7 Fr), integrated bipolar OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. As previously reported, the trial exceeded primary safety and efficacy objective thresholds, demonstrating favourable performance and zero fractures through ∼12 months follow-up, with patients in ongoing follow-up. Longer-term follow-up of the LEADR trial with emphasis on the sensing and detection capabilities of the OmniaSecure lead is reported here.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with indications for de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators/cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators were implanted with the OmniaSecure lead in standard right ventricle (RV) locations and followed at pre-specified intervals along with CareLink™ remote monitoring transmissions, where available. Throughout follow-up, the lead was evaluated for safety, efficacy, and reliability along with sensing and detection performance. There were 643/657 (97.9%) patients successfully implanted with the OmniaSecure lead with mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 5.5 months. There was a 96.9% freedom from major study lead-related complications at 24 months. Inappropriate shock rate was 2.7 and 3.8% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, 17.6% of patients received appropriate therapies (shock and/or ATP) with a 76.5% ATP efficacy. There have been zero fractures during follow-up along with chronically stable pacing capture threshold, pacing impedance, and R-wave amplitudes. There were four patients with an adverse event related to PWOS (0.6%), none of which was associated with inappropriate shock. There were four patients with an adverse event related to TWOS (0.6%), of which three patients were associated with inappropriate shock (0.5%). Oversensing was resolved predominantly by programming the RV sensitivity to less sensitive settings. During VF induction at implant, 97.6% (120/123) of patients showed appropriate VF episode detection at the least sensitive setting of 1.2 mV, with the remaining having detection at more sensitive settings. In follow-up, 670 VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected and treated in 94 patients with a variety of RV sensitivities and no reports of under-detected episodes. Moreover, a virtual sensitivity analysis also showed no under-detection across different RV sensitivity programming.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic sensing performance of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead demonstrated R-wave stability with a low rate of P-wave and T-wave oversensing, resolved predominantly by adjusting RV sensitivity. Further, VT/VF detection was successful and was not impacted when programmed to less sensitive settings. The OmniaSecure lead shows robust sensing and detection performance and programmability in ongoing follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europace\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除颤导联评估和可靠性(LEADR)试验评估了小直径(4.7Fr)、集成双极OmniaSecure除颤导联。正如先前报道的那样,该试验超过了主要的安全性和有效性目标阈值,在持续随访的患者中,通过~ 12个月的随访显示出良好的性能和零骨折。本文报道了LEADR试验的长期随访,重点是OmniaSecure导联的传感和检测能力。方法:将具有新生ICD/CRT-D适应症的患者在标准右心室(RV)位置植入OmniaSecure导联,并在预先指定的时间间隔内进行CareLink™远程监测传输(如果有)。在整个随访过程中,对铅的安全性、有效性和可靠性以及传感和检测性能进行了评估。结果:657例患者中643例(97.9%)成功植入,平均随访18.2±5.5个月。2年期间,96.9%的患者无主要研究铅相关并发症。1年和2年不适当休克率分别为2.7%和3.8%。2年后,17.6%的患者接受了适当的治疗(休克和/或ATP), ATP疗效为76.5%。随访期间无骨折发生,起搏捕获阈值、起搏阻抗和r波振幅长期稳定。有4例患者出现了与pws相关的不良事件(0.6%),没有一例与不适当的休克相关。有4例患者出现了与TWOS相关的不良事件(0.6%),其中3例患者出现了不适当的休克(0.5%)。通过将RV灵敏度设置为不太敏感的设置,可以解决过度敏感问题。在植入物诱导VF过程中,97.6%(120/123)的患者在1.2mV最不敏感的设置下检测到合适的VF发作,其余患者在更高敏感的设置下检测到。在随访中,在94例各种RV敏感性的患者中,670例VT/VF发作得到了适当的检测和治疗,没有未被检测到的发作报告。此外,虚拟灵敏度分析也表明,在不同的RV灵敏度规划中没有检测不足。结论:OmniaSecure除颤导联的慢性感应性能表现为r波稳定性,p波和t波过感应率低,主要通过调节右心室灵敏度来解决。此外,VT/VF检测是成功的,并且当编程到较低敏感的设置时不会受到影响。OmniaSecure导联具有强大的传感和检测性能以及可编程性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensing and detection performance of the novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead: in-depth analysis from the LEADR trial.

Aims: The Lead EvaluAtion for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) trial evaluated the small-diameter (4.7 Fr), integrated bipolar OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. As previously reported, the trial exceeded primary safety and efficacy objective thresholds, demonstrating favourable performance and zero fractures through ∼12 months follow-up, with patients in ongoing follow-up. Longer-term follow-up of the LEADR trial with emphasis on the sensing and detection capabilities of the OmniaSecure lead is reported here.

Methods and results: Patients with indications for de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators/cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators were implanted with the OmniaSecure lead in standard right ventricle (RV) locations and followed at pre-specified intervals along with CareLink™ remote monitoring transmissions, where available. Throughout follow-up, the lead was evaluated for safety, efficacy, and reliability along with sensing and detection performance. There were 643/657 (97.9%) patients successfully implanted with the OmniaSecure lead with mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 5.5 months. There was a 96.9% freedom from major study lead-related complications at 24 months. Inappropriate shock rate was 2.7 and 3.8% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, 17.6% of patients received appropriate therapies (shock and/or ATP) with a 76.5% ATP efficacy. There have been zero fractures during follow-up along with chronically stable pacing capture threshold, pacing impedance, and R-wave amplitudes. There were four patients with an adverse event related to PWOS (0.6%), none of which was associated with inappropriate shock. There were four patients with an adverse event related to TWOS (0.6%), of which three patients were associated with inappropriate shock (0.5%). Oversensing was resolved predominantly by programming the RV sensitivity to less sensitive settings. During VF induction at implant, 97.6% (120/123) of patients showed appropriate VF episode detection at the least sensitive setting of 1.2 mV, with the remaining having detection at more sensitive settings. In follow-up, 670 VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected and treated in 94 patients with a variety of RV sensitivities and no reports of under-detected episodes. Moreover, a virtual sensitivity analysis also showed no under-detection across different RV sensitivity programming.

Conclusion: Chronic sensing performance of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead demonstrated R-wave stability with a low rate of P-wave and T-wave oversensing, resolved predominantly by adjusting RV sensitivity. Further, VT/VF detection was successful and was not impacted when programmed to less sensitive settings. The OmniaSecure lead shows robust sensing and detection performance and programmability in ongoing follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信