血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉通路装置并发症和过早移除:一项多地点队列研究

EJHaem Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1002/jha2.1090
Kerrie Curtis, Samantha Keogh, Meinir Krishnasamy, Karla Gough
{"title":"血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉通路装置并发症和过早移除:一项多地点队列研究","authors":"Kerrie Curtis,&nbsp;Samantha Keogh,&nbsp;Meinir Krishnasamy,&nbsp;Karla Gough","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with haematological malignancies require urgent and reliable venous access for the administration of systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) commonly via central venous access devices (CVADs). Disease pathophysiology and side effects of SACTs increase the risk of complications during the dwell time and premature removal. CVAD complications are associated with treatment disruption, increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to comprehensively describe CVAD performance over a 12-month period in patients with haematological malignancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-site cohort study at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia was undertaken using multidisciplinary data from patient health records and administrative datasets including patient, device, insertion, maintenance, complication and removal data. Cases of interest were CVADs, ascertained using lists provided by the insertion services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1078 CVADs were inserted in 673 patients between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. Of the 1078 CVADs, 197 (18%) remained in situ, and 881 (82%) were removed, of which 369 (42%) were removed prematurely due to infection (<i>n</i> = 208, 57%) and non-infection related reasons (<i>n</i> = 201, 54%). Most CVADs (<i>n</i> = 919, 85%) had documented complications during their dwell time and the proportion of premature removals in these CVADs was over two-fold higher than CVADs with no documented complications. Multivariable Cox regression results indicated that CVAD type, urgency of the procedure, concurrent CVADs and insertion technology were associated with an increased risk of premature removal. Clinical variations in insertion and management care throughout the life of a CVAD and current evidence were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An unacceptably high proportion of CVADs had complications documented during the dwell time and were prematurely removed. Inconsistencies in current evidence and clinical practice highlight opportunities to positively impact CVAD outcomes in this cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.1090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Venous Access Device Complications and Premature Removal in Patients With Haematological Malignancies: A Multi-Site Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Kerrie Curtis,&nbsp;Samantha Keogh,&nbsp;Meinir Krishnasamy,&nbsp;Karla Gough\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jha2.1090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with haematological malignancies require urgent and reliable venous access for the administration of systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) commonly via central venous access devices (CVADs). Disease pathophysiology and side effects of SACTs increase the risk of complications during the dwell time and premature removal. CVAD complications are associated with treatment disruption, increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to comprehensively describe CVAD performance over a 12-month period in patients with haematological malignancies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multi-site cohort study at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia was undertaken using multidisciplinary data from patient health records and administrative datasets including patient, device, insertion, maintenance, complication and removal data. Cases of interest were CVADs, ascertained using lists provided by the insertion services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1078 CVADs were inserted in 673 patients between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. Of the 1078 CVADs, 197 (18%) remained in situ, and 881 (82%) were removed, of which 369 (42%) were removed prematurely due to infection (<i>n</i> = 208, 57%) and non-infection related reasons (<i>n</i> = 201, 54%). Most CVADs (<i>n</i> = 919, 85%) had documented complications during their dwell time and the proportion of premature removals in these CVADs was over two-fold higher than CVADs with no documented complications. Multivariable Cox regression results indicated that CVAD type, urgency of the procedure, concurrent CVADs and insertion technology were associated with an increased risk of premature removal. Clinical variations in insertion and management care throughout the life of a CVAD and current evidence were identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>An unacceptably high proportion of CVADs had complications documented during the dwell time and were prematurely removed. Inconsistencies in current evidence and clinical practice highlight opportunities to positively impact CVAD outcomes in this cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJHaem\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.1090\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJHaem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液学恶性肿瘤患者需要紧急和可靠的静脉通路进行全身抗癌治疗(SACTs),通常通过中心静脉通路装置(CVADs)。SACTs的疾病病理生理学和副作用增加了在停留时间和过早移除期间并发症的风险。心血管疾病并发症与治疗中断、发病率和死亡率增加有关。本研究旨在全面描述血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在12个月期间的CVAD表现。方法在澳大利亚墨尔本的四所三级医院进行多学科队列研究,使用来自患者健康记录和管理数据集的多学科数据,包括患者、器械、插入、维持、并发症和取出数据。感兴趣的病例是cvad,使用插入服务提供的列表确定。在2020年9月1日至2021年8月31日期间,673名患者共植入了1078个cvad。1078例cvad中,197例(18%)保留原位,881例(82%)切除,其中369例(42%)因感染(n = 208,57%)和非感染相关原因(n = 201,54%)过早切除。大多数cvad (n = 919, 85%)在停留期间有记录的并发症,这些cvad中过早清除的比例比没有记录并发症的cvad高出两倍以上。多变量Cox回归结果显示,CVAD类型、手术紧迫性、并发CVAD和插入技术与过早移除风险增加相关。确定了在整个CVAD生命周期中插入和管理护理的临床变化以及当前的证据。结论:高比例的CVADs在停留期间出现并发症并过早切除。当前证据和临床实践的不一致性突出了对该队列CVAD结果产生积极影响的机会。试验注册作者已确认该提交不需要临床试验注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Central Venous Access Device Complications and Premature Removal in Patients With Haematological Malignancies: A Multi-Site Cohort Study

Central Venous Access Device Complications and Premature Removal in Patients With Haematological Malignancies: A Multi-Site Cohort Study

Background

Patients with haematological malignancies require urgent and reliable venous access for the administration of systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) commonly via central venous access devices (CVADs). Disease pathophysiology and side effects of SACTs increase the risk of complications during the dwell time and premature removal. CVAD complications are associated with treatment disruption, increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to comprehensively describe CVAD performance over a 12-month period in patients with haematological malignancies.

Methods

A multi-site cohort study at four tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia was undertaken using multidisciplinary data from patient health records and administrative datasets including patient, device, insertion, maintenance, complication and removal data. Cases of interest were CVADs, ascertained using lists provided by the insertion services.

Findings

A total of 1078 CVADs were inserted in 673 patients between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. Of the 1078 CVADs, 197 (18%) remained in situ, and 881 (82%) were removed, of which 369 (42%) were removed prematurely due to infection (n = 208, 57%) and non-infection related reasons (n = 201, 54%). Most CVADs (n = 919, 85%) had documented complications during their dwell time and the proportion of premature removals in these CVADs was over two-fold higher than CVADs with no documented complications. Multivariable Cox regression results indicated that CVAD type, urgency of the procedure, concurrent CVADs and insertion technology were associated with an increased risk of premature removal. Clinical variations in insertion and management care throughout the life of a CVAD and current evidence were identified.

Conclusion

An unacceptably high proportion of CVADs had complications documented during the dwell time and were prematurely removed. Inconsistencies in current evidence and clinical practice highlight opportunities to positively impact CVAD outcomes in this cohort.

Trial Registration

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信