{"title":"“通用”手续?FATF相互评估报告文本(非)相似性分析","authors":"Sumedha Deshmukh","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) uses Mutual Evaluations (MEs) to monitor national implementation of and compliance with its recommendations. Countries face the risk of being placed “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” or “High-Risk Jurisdictions,” commonly known as the greylist and blacklist, if non-compliant. Greylisting has political and economic implications, including reputational damage, reduced development assistance, and reduced capital inflows. Despite “universal procedures” for the process, researchers have noted disparities, including a high number of Global South countries on the greylist. Using a corpus of 353 assessment documents, the research finds that the body or bodies conducting the assessment may have an impact on the assessment text and outcomes and shows that reports for greylisted countries have a high degree of similarity to non-greylisted countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Criminology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Universal” procedures? An analysis of text (dis)similarities in FATF mutual evaluation reports\",\"authors\":\"Sumedha Deshmukh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) uses Mutual Evaluations (MEs) to monitor national implementation of and compliance with its recommendations. Countries face the risk of being placed “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” or “High-Risk Jurisdictions,” commonly known as the greylist and blacklist, if non-compliant. Greylisting has political and economic implications, including reputational damage, reduced development assistance, and reduced capital inflows. Despite “universal procedures” for the process, researchers have noted disparities, including a high number of Global South countries on the greylist. Using a corpus of 353 assessment documents, the research finds that the body or bodies conducting the assessment may have an impact on the assessment text and outcomes and shows that reports for greylisted countries have a high degree of similarity to non-greylisted countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Criminology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Universal” procedures? An analysis of text (dis)similarities in FATF mutual evaluation reports
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) uses Mutual Evaluations (MEs) to monitor national implementation of and compliance with its recommendations. Countries face the risk of being placed “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” or “High-Risk Jurisdictions,” commonly known as the greylist and blacklist, if non-compliant. Greylisting has political and economic implications, including reputational damage, reduced development assistance, and reduced capital inflows. Despite “universal procedures” for the process, researchers have noted disparities, including a high number of Global South countries on the greylist. Using a corpus of 353 assessment documents, the research finds that the body or bodies conducting the assessment may have an impact on the assessment text and outcomes and shows that reports for greylisted countries have a high degree of similarity to non-greylisted countries.