基于自信心的动态权重和个性化调整约束的多属性群体决策共识达成模型

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xiaoan Tang , Meng Sun , Qiang Zhang , Witold Pedrycz , Yinghua Shen
{"title":"基于自信心的动态权重和个性化调整约束的多属性群体决策共识达成模型","authors":"Xiaoan Tang ,&nbsp;Meng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Witold Pedrycz ,&nbsp;Yinghua Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.111032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is quite a remarkable fact that experts always hope that the final decision outcome can preserve their original assessments in practical multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) activities to a high degree, which can be reflected from their self-confidence in their own assessments. Meanwhile, experts may have different attitude towards the assessment modification at the levels of attribute and alternative in consensus reaching process (CRP), which is commonly characterized by their personalized adjustment constraints on the acceptance of the assessment’ modification suggestions recommended by moderators. Motivated by the facts outlined above, this study proposes a consensus reaching method with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for the MAGDM problem. First, a self-confidence-based dynamic weight management method is proposed to accelerate the CRP. Next, considering that experts may have different levels of sensitivities/tolerances for their assessment modifications at the various attribute and alternative levels, a dynamic weight and personalized adjustment constraint-driven consensus model is proposed with the objective of minimizing the distance between experts’ initial assessments and the adjusted collective assessment. Meanwhile, an associated maximum consensus model is implemented to examine whether a predetermined consensus threshold can be achieved with the given assessments. Then, a resolution approach with an interactive CRP that can reconcile the goals that experts should be allocated enough attention and their original assessments should be preserved as much as possible is developed. Finally, three illustrative examples and a comparative study are conducted to show the validity and advantages of the proposal. Overall, this study exhibits three facets of originality: the dynamic weight management method is developed, the personalized assessment-modification willingness is formed, and the interactive consensus reaching algorithm is created.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 111032"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus reaching model with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for multi-attribute group decision making\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoan Tang ,&nbsp;Meng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Witold Pedrycz ,&nbsp;Yinghua Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2025.111032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is quite a remarkable fact that experts always hope that the final decision outcome can preserve their original assessments in practical multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) activities to a high degree, which can be reflected from their self-confidence in their own assessments. Meanwhile, experts may have different attitude towards the assessment modification at the levels of attribute and alternative in consensus reaching process (CRP), which is commonly characterized by their personalized adjustment constraints on the acceptance of the assessment’ modification suggestions recommended by moderators. Motivated by the facts outlined above, this study proposes a consensus reaching method with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for the MAGDM problem. First, a self-confidence-based dynamic weight management method is proposed to accelerate the CRP. Next, considering that experts may have different levels of sensitivities/tolerances for their assessment modifications at the various attribute and alternative levels, a dynamic weight and personalized adjustment constraint-driven consensus model is proposed with the objective of minimizing the distance between experts’ initial assessments and the adjusted collective assessment. Meanwhile, an associated maximum consensus model is implemented to examine whether a predetermined consensus threshold can be achieved with the given assessments. Then, a resolution approach with an interactive CRP that can reconcile the goals that experts should be allocated enough attention and their original assessments should be preserved as much as possible is developed. Finally, three illustrative examples and a comparative study are conducted to show the validity and advantages of the proposal. Overall, this study exhibits three facets of originality: the dynamic weight management method is developed, the personalized assessment-modification willingness is formed, and the interactive consensus reaching algorithm is created.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225001780\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225001780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus reaching model with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for multi-attribute group decision making
It is quite a remarkable fact that experts always hope that the final decision outcome can preserve their original assessments in practical multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) activities to a high degree, which can be reflected from their self-confidence in their own assessments. Meanwhile, experts may have different attitude towards the assessment modification at the levels of attribute and alternative in consensus reaching process (CRP), which is commonly characterized by their personalized adjustment constraints on the acceptance of the assessment’ modification suggestions recommended by moderators. Motivated by the facts outlined above, this study proposes a consensus reaching method with self-confidence-based dynamic weights and personalized adjustment constraints for the MAGDM problem. First, a self-confidence-based dynamic weight management method is proposed to accelerate the CRP. Next, considering that experts may have different levels of sensitivities/tolerances for their assessment modifications at the various attribute and alternative levels, a dynamic weight and personalized adjustment constraint-driven consensus model is proposed with the objective of minimizing the distance between experts’ initial assessments and the adjusted collective assessment. Meanwhile, an associated maximum consensus model is implemented to examine whether a predetermined consensus threshold can be achieved with the given assessments. Then, a resolution approach with an interactive CRP that can reconcile the goals that experts should be allocated enough attention and their original assessments should be preserved as much as possible is developed. Finally, three illustrative examples and a comparative study are conducted to show the validity and advantages of the proposal. Overall, this study exhibits three facets of originality: the dynamic weight management method is developed, the personalized assessment-modification willingness is formed, and the interactive consensus reaching algorithm is created.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信