在医疗保险药品价格谈判计划中使用真实证据:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心和制造商的清单。

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf030
Sean R Tunis, Jason Shafrin, Kyi-Sin Than, Melanie D Whittington, Richard J Willke, Murtuza Bharmal
{"title":"在医疗保险药品价格谈判计划中使用真实证据:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心和制造商的清单。","authors":"Sean R Tunis, Jason Shafrin, Kyi-Sin Than, Melanie D Whittington, Richard J Willke, Murtuza Bharmal","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) \"maximum fair price\" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers.\",\"authors\":\"Sean R Tunis, Jason Shafrin, Kyi-Sin Than, Melanie D Whittington, Richard J Willke, Murtuza Bharmal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) \\\"maximum fair price\\\" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"qxaf030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据通货膨胀减少法案(IRA) -医疗保险药品价格谈判计划,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)“最大公平价格”必须以以下因素的证据为依据:所选药物与其替代药物相比的治疗进展、临床和患者报告结果的比较有效性、对特定人群的影响以及解决未满足医疗需求的能力。本文描述了真实世界的证据如何改善CMS的决策,并创建了一个最佳实践清单,以帮助CMS评估任何制造商提交的证据的质量。该清单的制定分四个步骤:(i)通过审查CMS的官方指导,确定确定最大公平价格的IRA要求;(ii)评估除了临床试验证据之外,还可以得到真实世界证据(RWE)支持的条款;(iii)对现有与RWE相关的最佳实践指南进行文献回顾;(iv)通过专家之间的一系列网络会议讨论,将这些RWE指南整合到清单中。该清单旨在提高CMS在药品价格谈判过程中可获得信息的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of real-world evidence in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A checklist for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and manufacturers.

Under the Inflation Reduction Act's (IRA's) - Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) "maximum fair price" must be informed by evidence on factors such as therapeutic advance of the selected drug compared with its alternative, comparative effectiveness across clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the impact on specific populations, and the ability to address unmet medical needs. This paper describes how real-world evidence could improve CMS decision-making and creates a best practices checklist to help CMS evaluate the quality of any manufacturer-submitted evidence. The checklist was developed in four steps: (i) identification of the IRA requirements for determining the maximum fair price through a review of official guidance from CMS, (ii) assessment of provisions that could be supported by real-world evidence (RWE) in addition to clinical trial evidence, (iii) literature review on existing best-practice guidelines relevant to RWE, and (iv) consolidation of these RWE guidelines into a checklist through a series of web conference discussions among experts. The checklist aims to improve the quality of the information available to CMS during the drug price negotiation process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信