单侧双门静脉内窥镜-单侧椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄的学习曲线及并发症。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2024.17905
Jiashen Shao, Zihan Fan, Hai Meng, Qi Fei
{"title":"单侧双门静脉内窥镜-单侧椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄的学习曲线及并发症。","authors":"Jiashen Shao, Zihan Fan, Hai Meng, Qi Fei","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2024.17905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique has been widely adopted for treat‑ ment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis. Understanding its learning curve, as well as the factors that influence perioperative complications, is crucial for mastering and effectively learning this technique.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to analyze the learning curve of UBE‑unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent UBE from June 2021 to December 2023 at the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline information, perioperative data, and preoperative and postoperative subjective scores were recorded for all patients. The learning curve and identified risk factors for complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 consecutive patients who underwent single‑segment UBE‑ULBD were included in this study. The surgical time curve fitting indicated that the surgeon nearly mastered the technique by the 38th case. Consequently, the cohort was divided into 2 distinct phases: a learning phase (cases 1-38) and a mastery phase (cases 39-122). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and drainage volume were higher in the learning phase group than in the mastery phase group, although hidden blood loss in the learning phase group was lower than in the mastery phase group. The visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the last follow‑up showed significant improvement in both groups as compared with the preoperative period (P <0.05). Complication rate was 7.9% in the learning phase and 3.6% in the mastery phase. Univariate analysis showed that age, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and estimated blood loss were significantly associated with complication rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UBE is an effective minimally‑invasive spinal endoscopic technique for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, offering short time to achieving surgical mastery and a low complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"19 4","pages":"489-497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning curve and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopy-unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiashen Shao, Zihan Fan, Hai Meng, Qi Fei\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/wiitm.2024.17905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique has been widely adopted for treat‑ ment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis. Understanding its learning curve, as well as the factors that influence perioperative complications, is crucial for mastering and effectively learning this technique.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to analyze the learning curve of UBE‑unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent UBE from June 2021 to December 2023 at the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline information, perioperative data, and preoperative and postoperative subjective scores were recorded for all patients. The learning curve and identified risk factors for complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 consecutive patients who underwent single‑segment UBE‑ULBD were included in this study. The surgical time curve fitting indicated that the surgeon nearly mastered the technique by the 38th case. Consequently, the cohort was divided into 2 distinct phases: a learning phase (cases 1-38) and a mastery phase (cases 39-122). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and drainage volume were higher in the learning phase group than in the mastery phase group, although hidden blood loss in the learning phase group was lower than in the mastery phase group. The visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the last follow‑up showed significant improvement in both groups as compared with the preoperative period (P <0.05). Complication rate was 7.9% in the learning phase and 3.6% in the mastery phase. Univariate analysis showed that age, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and estimated blood loss were significantly associated with complication rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UBE is an effective minimally‑invasive spinal endoscopic technique for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, offering short time to achieving surgical mastery and a low complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"489-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2024.17905\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2024.17905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单侧双门静脉内镜(UBE)技术已被广泛应用于腰椎间盘突出症和腰椎管狭窄症的治疗。了解其学习曲线,以及影响围手术期并发症的因素,对于掌握和有效学习这项技术至关重要。目的:我们的目的是分析UBE -单侧椎板切除术双侧减压(ULBD)的学习曲线和围手术期并发症的相关危险因素。材料和方法:回顾性分析北京友谊医院骨科2021年6月至2023年12月连续行UBE手术的患者。记录所有患者的基线信息、围手术期数据以及术前和术后主观评分。分析学习曲线和确定的并发症危险因素。结果:本研究共纳入了122例连续接受单节段UBE - ULBD的患者。手术时间曲线拟合表明,到第38例时,术者已基本掌握手术技术。因此,该队列被分为两个不同的阶段:学习阶段(病例1-38)和掌握阶段(病例39-122)。学习期组的隐性失血量低于掌握期组,但学习期组的手术时间、估计失血量和引流量均高于掌握期组。最后一次随访时,两组患者的视觉模拟评分和Oswestry残疾指数评分均较术前有显著改善(P)。结论:UBE是治疗腰椎管狭窄症的一种有效的微创脊柱内窥镜技术,掌握手术时间短,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning curve and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopy-unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Introduction: The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique has been widely adopted for treat‑ ment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis. Understanding its learning curve, as well as the factors that influence perioperative complications, is crucial for mastering and effectively learning this technique.

Aim: Our aim was to analyze the learning curve of UBE‑unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and risk factors associated with perioperative complications.

Materials and methods: Consecutive patients who underwent UBE from June 2021 to December 2023 at the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline information, perioperative data, and preoperative and postoperative subjective scores were recorded for all patients. The learning curve and identified risk factors for complications were analyzed.

Results: A total of 122 consecutive patients who underwent single‑segment UBE‑ULBD were included in this study. The surgical time curve fitting indicated that the surgeon nearly mastered the technique by the 38th case. Consequently, the cohort was divided into 2 distinct phases: a learning phase (cases 1-38) and a mastery phase (cases 39-122). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and drainage volume were higher in the learning phase group than in the mastery phase group, although hidden blood loss in the learning phase group was lower than in the mastery phase group. The visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the last follow‑up showed significant improvement in both groups as compared with the preoperative period (P <0.05). Complication rate was 7.9% in the learning phase and 3.6% in the mastery phase. Univariate analysis showed that age, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and estimated blood loss were significantly associated with complication rate.

Conclusions: UBE is an effective minimally‑invasive spinal endoscopic technique for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, offering short time to achieving surgical mastery and a low complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信