IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruth M Gibson, Paul H Wise, Joseph L Dieleman, Yoto V Yotov, Aleksandra Kirilakha, Gary L Darmstadt, Eran Bendavid, Constantinos Syropoulos, Michele Barry, Sebastien Bradley
{"title":"The impact of aid sanctions on maternal and child mortality, 1990-2019: a panel analysis.","authors":"Ruth M Gibson, Paul H Wise, Joseph L Dieleman, Yoto V Yotov, Aleksandra Kirilakha, Gary L Darmstadt, Eran Bendavid, Constantinos Syropoulos, Michele Barry, Sebastien Bradley","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00058-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aid sanctions are a type of financial punishment imposed on a country by other countries or international organisations in response to a political coup, armed conflict, or human rights abuses. Humanitarian catastrophes in Burkina Faso, Sudan, and Myanmar have brought aid sanctions to the centre of the foreign affairs strategy debate because of their inadvertent negative effects on human health. Our analysis investigates the effects of aid sanctions from 1990 to 2019 on maternal and child mortality. These questions are particularly relevant in the context of the abrupt shift in US foreign aid policy in 2025, leading to aid prohibitions that might resemble aid sanctions in their effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from a broad set of sources, including population health metrics databases, established sanctions databases, and a novel global dataset on aid sanctions created for this study. We assessed the prevalence of the use of aid sanctions worldwide during 1990-2019 and estimated their impact on official development assistance (ODA) and development assistance for health (DAH). We investigated the effect of aid sanctions on infant (age <1 year), children younger than 5 years (hereafter referred to as under-5), maternal (within 42 days of the end of pregnancy), and all-age mortality rates using panel difference-in-differences ordinary least squares estimation. We applied linear regression methods and included country and year fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and multiple control variables. We also conducted a series of sensitivity analyses, including entropy balancing, to confirm the validity of our results.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During our study period, 67 low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs) and sovereign territories (hereafter referred to as countries) were targeted by 88 unique aid sanction episodes. Relative to our control group of 66 never-sanctioned countries, aid sanctions reduced ODA by an estimated US$213·07 million per year (95% CI 502·28 to -76·12) for the average target country and reduced DAH by $16·42 million (32·57 to 0·27)--a 17% reduction in DAH. Aid sanctions resulted in an additional 129·3 infant deaths per 100 000 livebirths (11·7 to 246·9), an additional 47·1 under-5 deaths per 100 000 livebirths (-2·8 to 97·0), and an additional 10·9 (2·2-19·6) maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths, per year. Relative to mean in-sample mortality rates, aid sanctions thus increased infant, under-5, and maternal mortality rates by 3·1%, 3·6%, and 6·4%, respectively, on an annual basis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Over the period 1990-2019, infant, under-5, and maternal mortality rates among LMICs declined at average annualised rates of 2·6%, 3·2%, and 2·0%, respectively. Aid sanction episodes lasting 5 years-the median duration observed in our sample-would thus negate nearly 30% of the overall improvements in infant and under-5 mortality seen in the average LMIC over this period and approximately 60% of the improvements in maternal mortality. Our findings suggest that aid sanctions are leading to increases in child and maternal mortality via reductions to ODA and DAH and they can inadvertently compound human suffering. This research provides quantitative evidence to support growing legislative awareness of the importance of assessing health impacts while aid sanctions are imposed, and highlights the need to monitor the consequences of foreign aid policies by donor countries, such as foreign aid prohibitions and restrictions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Center for Innovation in Global Health and the Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Stanford University.</p><p><strong>Translations: </strong>For the Arabic, French, Mandarin and Russian translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00058-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:援助制裁是其他国家或国际组织针对一个国家的政治政变、武装冲突或侵犯人权行为而实施的一种经济制裁。布基纳法索、苏丹和缅甸的人道主义灾难将援助制裁推向了外交战略辩论的中心,因为制裁会在不经意间对人类健康产生负面影响。我们的分析调查了 1990 年至 2019 年援助制裁对孕产妇和儿童死亡率的影响。在 2025 年美国对外援助政策突然转变的背景下,这些问题显得尤为重要,因为这将导致援助禁令,而援助禁令的效果可能与援助制裁相似:数据来源广泛,包括人口健康指标数据库、已建立的制裁数据库以及为本研究创建的有关援助制裁的新型全球数据集。我们评估了 1990-2019 年间全球使用援助制裁的普遍程度,并估算了其对官方发展援助(ODA)和卫生发展援助(DAH)的影响。我们调查了援助制裁对婴儿(年龄)的影响:在我们的研究期间,有 67 个低收入或中等收入国家(LMICs)和主权领土(以下简称国家)成为 88 次独特援助制裁的目标。与我们的对照组(66 个从未受到制裁的国家)相比,援助制裁使目标国家平均每年的官方发展援助减少了约 2.13 亿至 0.07 亿美元(95% CI 为 5.02-28 至 -76-12),国内总产值减少了 1,600 万至 4,200 万美元(3,275 万至 0.27 亿美元)--国内总产值减少了 17%。援助制裁导致每年每 10 万活产婴儿死亡人数增加 129-3 人(11-7 至 246-9),每 10 万活产 5 岁以下儿童死亡人数增加 47-1 人(-2-8 至 97-0),每 10 万活产产妇死亡人数增加 10-9 人(2-2-19-6)。因此,相对于平均样本死亡率,援助制裁使婴儿、5 岁以下儿童和孕产妇死亡率每年分别增加 3-1%、3-6% 和 6-4%:在 1990-2019 年期间,低收入和中等收入国家的婴儿、5 岁以下儿童和孕产妇死亡率的年均下降率分别为 2-6%、3-2% 和 2-0%。因此,如果援助制裁持续 5 年(这是我们在样本中观察到的持续时间中位数),就会抵消在此期间低收入国家平均婴儿和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率总体改善幅度的近 30%,以及孕产妇死亡率改善幅度的约 60%。我们的研究结果表明,援助制裁通过减少官方发展援助(ODA)和国内直接投资(DAH)导致了儿童和孕产妇死亡率的上升,并在无意中加重了人类的痛苦。这项研究提供了定量证据,以支持立法机构日益认识到在实施援助制裁的同时评估健康影响的重要性,并强调了监测捐助国对外援助政策(如禁止和限制对外援助)后果的必要性:资助机构:斯坦福大学全球健康创新中心和母婴健康研究所:摘要的阿拉伯语、法语、普通话和俄语译文请参见 "补充材料 "部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of aid sanctions on maternal and child mortality, 1990-2019: a panel analysis.

Background: Aid sanctions are a type of financial punishment imposed on a country by other countries or international organisations in response to a political coup, armed conflict, or human rights abuses. Humanitarian catastrophes in Burkina Faso, Sudan, and Myanmar have brought aid sanctions to the centre of the foreign affairs strategy debate because of their inadvertent negative effects on human health. Our analysis investigates the effects of aid sanctions from 1990 to 2019 on maternal and child mortality. These questions are particularly relevant in the context of the abrupt shift in US foreign aid policy in 2025, leading to aid prohibitions that might resemble aid sanctions in their effects.

Methods: Data were drawn from a broad set of sources, including population health metrics databases, established sanctions databases, and a novel global dataset on aid sanctions created for this study. We assessed the prevalence of the use of aid sanctions worldwide during 1990-2019 and estimated their impact on official development assistance (ODA) and development assistance for health (DAH). We investigated the effect of aid sanctions on infant (age <1 year), children younger than 5 years (hereafter referred to as under-5), maternal (within 42 days of the end of pregnancy), and all-age mortality rates using panel difference-in-differences ordinary least squares estimation. We applied linear regression methods and included country and year fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and multiple control variables. We also conducted a series of sensitivity analyses, including entropy balancing, to confirm the validity of our results.

Findings: During our study period, 67 low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs) and sovereign territories (hereafter referred to as countries) were targeted by 88 unique aid sanction episodes. Relative to our control group of 66 never-sanctioned countries, aid sanctions reduced ODA by an estimated US$213·07 million per year (95% CI 502·28 to -76·12) for the average target country and reduced DAH by $16·42 million (32·57 to 0·27)--a 17% reduction in DAH. Aid sanctions resulted in an additional 129·3 infant deaths per 100 000 livebirths (11·7 to 246·9), an additional 47·1 under-5 deaths per 100 000 livebirths (-2·8 to 97·0), and an additional 10·9 (2·2-19·6) maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths, per year. Relative to mean in-sample mortality rates, aid sanctions thus increased infant, under-5, and maternal mortality rates by 3·1%, 3·6%, and 6·4%, respectively, on an annual basis.

Interpretation: Over the period 1990-2019, infant, under-5, and maternal mortality rates among LMICs declined at average annualised rates of 2·6%, 3·2%, and 2·0%, respectively. Aid sanction episodes lasting 5 years-the median duration observed in our sample-would thus negate nearly 30% of the overall improvements in infant and under-5 mortality seen in the average LMIC over this period and approximately 60% of the improvements in maternal mortality. Our findings suggest that aid sanctions are leading to increases in child and maternal mortality via reductions to ODA and DAH and they can inadvertently compound human suffering. This research provides quantitative evidence to support growing legislative awareness of the importance of assessing health impacts while aid sanctions are imposed, and highlights the need to monitor the consequences of foreign aid policies by donor countries, such as foreign aid prohibitions and restrictions.

Funding: Center for Innovation in Global Health and the Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Stanford University.

Translations: For the Arabic, French, Mandarin and Russian translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信