检查消融线——双向阻断是否足够?

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2025.16031
Sebastian Weyand, Stephanie Löbig, Peter Seizer
{"title":"检查消融线——双向阻断是否足够?","authors":"Sebastian Weyand, Stephanie Löbig, Peter Seizer","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2025.16031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report presents a 71-year-old man undergoing repeat ablation for atypical atrial flutter after prior pulmonary vein isolation and subsequent re-ablation involving an anterior mitral line and a posterior box. High-density mapping revealed reconnection at the left superior pulmonary vein, which was successfully re-isolated. Although bidirectional block of the anterior mitral line was confirmed via local activation time (LAT) mapping during differential pacing, burst stimulation induced atrial flutter. Further LAT mapping during flutter identified very slow conduction through a gap in the anterior mitral line. Ablation at this site restored sinus rhythm, and the arrhythmia was no longer inducible. This case highlights that bidirectional block confirmation alone may not suffice to detect gaps with slow conduction. It underscores the necessity of arrhythmia induction and mapping to reliably identify and address such gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"16 3","pages":"6229-6230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Checking Ablation Lines-Is Bidirectional Block Sufficient?\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Weyand, Stephanie Löbig, Peter Seizer\",\"doi\":\"10.19102/icrm.2025.16031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This case report presents a 71-year-old man undergoing repeat ablation for atypical atrial flutter after prior pulmonary vein isolation and subsequent re-ablation involving an anterior mitral line and a posterior box. High-density mapping revealed reconnection at the left superior pulmonary vein, which was successfully re-isolated. Although bidirectional block of the anterior mitral line was confirmed via local activation time (LAT) mapping during differential pacing, burst stimulation induced atrial flutter. Further LAT mapping during flutter identified very slow conduction through a gap in the anterior mitral line. Ablation at this site restored sinus rhythm, and the arrhythmia was no longer inducible. This case highlights that bidirectional block confirmation alone may not suffice to detect gaps with slow conduction. It underscores the necessity of arrhythmia induction and mapping to reliably identify and address such gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"6229-6230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2025.16031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2025.16031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本病例报告介绍了一位71岁的男性,在先前的肺静脉隔离和随后的二尖瓣前线和后盒再次消融后,因不典型心房扑动进行反复消融。高密度显像显示左上肺静脉重连,并成功重新分离。虽然通过局部激活时间(LAT)作图证实了二尖瓣前线的双向阻滞,但脉冲刺激诱导心房扑动。进一步的LAT制图在扑动期间发现非常缓慢的传导通过二尖瓣前线的间隙。该部位的消融恢复了窦性心律,不再诱发心律失常。本病例强调,仅双向阻滞确认可能不足以检测传导缓慢的间隙。它强调心律失常诱导和绘图的必要性,以可靠地识别和解决这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Checking Ablation Lines-Is Bidirectional Block Sufficient?

This case report presents a 71-year-old man undergoing repeat ablation for atypical atrial flutter after prior pulmonary vein isolation and subsequent re-ablation involving an anterior mitral line and a posterior box. High-density mapping revealed reconnection at the left superior pulmonary vein, which was successfully re-isolated. Although bidirectional block of the anterior mitral line was confirmed via local activation time (LAT) mapping during differential pacing, burst stimulation induced atrial flutter. Further LAT mapping during flutter identified very slow conduction through a gap in the anterior mitral line. Ablation at this site restored sinus rhythm, and the arrhythmia was no longer inducible. This case highlights that bidirectional block confirmation alone may not suffice to detect gaps with slow conduction. It underscores the necessity of arrhythmia induction and mapping to reliably identify and address such gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信