腹腔镜结肠切除术中血管蒂剥离时间作为手术技能的新标志:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kirsten de Burlet, Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, Jeffrey Tan, Anthony Lin, Siraj Rajaratnam, Saxon Connor, Timothy Eglinton
{"title":"腹腔镜结肠切除术中血管蒂剥离时间作为手术技能的新标志:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Kirsten de Burlet, Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, Jeffrey Tan, Anthony Lin, Siraj Rajaratnam, Saxon Connor, Timothy Eglinton","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes after colorectal resections depend on patient, pathology and operative factors. Existing validated surgical skills scores (such as the competency assessment tool (CAT)) are directly correlated with outcomes but are time-consuming to administer, limiting their clinical utility. The vascular pedicle dissection time (VPDT) is a novel, simple surgical skill assessment measure with the potential for computer vision automation. This study aimed to assess the VPDT and benchmark it against the CAT score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentre study was performed in New Zealand, recording videos of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Patient, operation and histology characteristics were also collected. The VPDT was calculated from retraction of the vascular pedicle to completion of medial dissection, including vascular division. Each laparoscopic video was scored by two independent colorectal surgeons, and the median CAT score was grouped into tertiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154 patients were included between December 2020 and November 2023 (74 (48.1%) right-sided and 80 (51.9%) left-sided resections). Median VPDT was significantly different between the CAT score groups for the right-sided resections (lower, 15 min; middle, 13 min; higher, 10 min; p = 0.036) and the left-sided resections (lower, 46 min; middle, 40 min; higher, 26 min; p =  < 0.001). There was no significant difference in R1 resection, anastomotic leak rate, the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications or re-admission between the CAT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the VPDT was inversely correlated with the CAT score, indicating that it quantifies operative technical skill. A current study is evaluating the suitability of VPDT for real-time measurement using computer vision algorithms. This could allow for automated assessment of surgeons' learning curve and skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten de Burlet, Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, Jeffrey Tan, Anthony Lin, Siraj Rajaratnam, Saxon Connor, Timothy Eglinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes after colorectal resections depend on patient, pathology and operative factors. Existing validated surgical skills scores (such as the competency assessment tool (CAT)) are directly correlated with outcomes but are time-consuming to administer, limiting their clinical utility. The vascular pedicle dissection time (VPDT) is a novel, simple surgical skill assessment measure with the potential for computer vision automation. This study aimed to assess the VPDT and benchmark it against the CAT score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentre study was performed in New Zealand, recording videos of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Patient, operation and histology characteristics were also collected. The VPDT was calculated from retraction of the vascular pedicle to completion of medial dissection, including vascular division. Each laparoscopic video was scored by two independent colorectal surgeons, and the median CAT score was grouped into tertiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154 patients were included between December 2020 and November 2023 (74 (48.1%) right-sided and 80 (51.9%) left-sided resections). Median VPDT was significantly different between the CAT score groups for the right-sided resections (lower, 15 min; middle, 13 min; higher, 10 min; p = 0.036) and the left-sided resections (lower, 46 min; middle, 40 min; higher, 26 min; p =  < 0.001). There was no significant difference in R1 resection, anastomotic leak rate, the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications or re-admission between the CAT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the VPDT was inversely correlated with the CAT score, indicating that it quantifies operative technical skill. A current study is evaluating the suitability of VPDT for real-time measurement using computer vision algorithms. This could allow for automated assessment of surgeons' learning curve and skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠切除术后的预后取决于患者、病理和手术因素。现有经过验证的手术技能评分(如能力评估工具(CAT))与结果直接相关,但管理起来很耗时,限制了它们的临床应用。血管蒂剥离时间(VPDT)是一种新颖、简单的手术技能评估方法,具有计算机视觉自动化的潜力。本研究旨在评估VPDT并将其与CAT评分进行比较。方法:在新西兰进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,记录了腹腔镜结肠直肠切除术的视频。同时收集患者、手术及组织学特征。从血管蒂缩回到内侧剥离完成,包括血管分裂,计算VPDT。每个腹腔镜视频由两位独立的结直肠外科医生评分,CAT评分中位数分组。结果:在2020年12月至2023年11月期间,共纳入154例患者(74例(48.1%)右侧切除,80例(51.9%)左侧切除)。右侧切除的CAT评分组中位VPDT有显著差异(较低,15分钟;中间,13分钟;更高,10分钟;P = 0.036)和左侧切除(较低,46分钟;中期,40分钟;较高,26分钟;p = 3并发症或再入院。结论:本研究显示VPDT与CAT评分呈负相关,表明VPDT量化了手术技术水平。目前的一项研究正在评估VPDT使用计算机视觉算法进行实时测量的适用性。这将允许对外科医生的学习曲线和技能进行自动评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.

Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.

Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.

Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Outcomes after colorectal resections depend on patient, pathology and operative factors. Existing validated surgical skills scores (such as the competency assessment tool (CAT)) are directly correlated with outcomes but are time-consuming to administer, limiting their clinical utility. The vascular pedicle dissection time (VPDT) is a novel, simple surgical skill assessment measure with the potential for computer vision automation. This study aimed to assess the VPDT and benchmark it against the CAT score.

Methods: A prospective multicentre study was performed in New Zealand, recording videos of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Patient, operation and histology characteristics were also collected. The VPDT was calculated from retraction of the vascular pedicle to completion of medial dissection, including vascular division. Each laparoscopic video was scored by two independent colorectal surgeons, and the median CAT score was grouped into tertiles.

Results: In total, 154 patients were included between December 2020 and November 2023 (74 (48.1%) right-sided and 80 (51.9%) left-sided resections). Median VPDT was significantly different between the CAT score groups for the right-sided resections (lower, 15 min; middle, 13 min; higher, 10 min; p = 0.036) and the left-sided resections (lower, 46 min; middle, 40 min; higher, 26 min; p =  < 0.001). There was no significant difference in R1 resection, anastomotic leak rate, the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications or re-admission between the CAT groups.

Conclusions: This study showed that the VPDT was inversely correlated with the CAT score, indicating that it quantifies operative technical skill. A current study is evaluating the suitability of VPDT for real-time measurement using computer vision algorithms. This could allow for automated assessment of surgeons' learning curve and skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信