在卫生服务和政策研究中导航敌对工作场所和教育空间。

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0121
Taylor B Rogers, Kevin Q Graham, Carmen R Mitchell, Tongtan Chantarat, Michelle J Ko
{"title":"在卫生服务和政策研究中导航敌对工作场所和教育空间。","authors":"Taylor B Rogers, Kevin Q Graham, Carmen R Mitchell, Tongtan Chantarat, Michelle J Ko","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The representation of ethnoracial minoritized individuals in health services and policy research (HSPR) has increased in recent years. However, previous literature has exposed a need to acknowledge and attend to inequities within the HSPR workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To describe educational and workplace experiences that characterize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the HSPR profession. In this qualitative study, six focus groups were conducted virtually via Zoom with 27 individuals who reported working or pursuing higher education in HSPR from December 2020 to January 2021. We sought HSPRers perspectives on DEI initiatives, work and educational environments, experiences, and climate, and recommendations for improving DEI in HSPR. We developed a structured codebook and applied a deductive approach to conduct thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27 participants, nearly half of participants identified as Black/African American (44%); most were women (81%). Three major themes emerged: (1) HSPR work and education spaces subject minoritized HSPRs to a range of exclusionary and harmful practices; (2) DEI initiatives fail to address the need for institutional change; and (3) by working with and for policymakers, HSPRs are uniquely subjected to shifting political contexts that reinforce racism.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite an increasing commitment to increasing the diversity of the HSPR workforce and improving equity and inclusion in the HSPR workplace, the findings suggest that more intentional and action-oriented work is needed, especially work that emphasizes inclusion and equity across various levels of the workplace.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>The findings offer critical insight on necessary workplace and educational reform to develop the workforce necessary to advance population health equity and equity-oriented policy making.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"806-815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Hostile Workplaces and Educational Spaces Within Health Services and Policy Research.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor B Rogers, Kevin Q Graham, Carmen R Mitchell, Tongtan Chantarat, Michelle J Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/heq.2024.0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The representation of ethnoracial minoritized individuals in health services and policy research (HSPR) has increased in recent years. However, previous literature has exposed a need to acknowledge and attend to inequities within the HSPR workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To describe educational and workplace experiences that characterize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the HSPR profession. In this qualitative study, six focus groups were conducted virtually via Zoom with 27 individuals who reported working or pursuing higher education in HSPR from December 2020 to January 2021. We sought HSPRers perspectives on DEI initiatives, work and educational environments, experiences, and climate, and recommendations for improving DEI in HSPR. We developed a structured codebook and applied a deductive approach to conduct thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27 participants, nearly half of participants identified as Black/African American (44%); most were women (81%). Three major themes emerged: (1) HSPR work and education spaces subject minoritized HSPRs to a range of exclusionary and harmful practices; (2) DEI initiatives fail to address the need for institutional change; and (3) by working with and for policymakers, HSPRs are uniquely subjected to shifting political contexts that reinforce racism.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite an increasing commitment to increasing the diversity of the HSPR workforce and improving equity and inclusion in the HSPR workplace, the findings suggest that more intentional and action-oriented work is needed, especially work that emphasizes inclusion and equity across various levels of the workplace.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>The findings offer critical insight on necessary workplace and educational reform to develop the workforce necessary to advance population health equity and equity-oriented policy making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Equity\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"806-815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,少数民族个人在卫生服务和政策研究(HSPR)中的代表性有所增加。然而,以前的文献已经暴露了承认和关注HSPR劳动力内部不平等的必要性。方法:描述HSPR专业中具有多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)特征的教育和工作经历。在这项定性研究中,通过Zoom对27名报告在2020年12月至2021年1月期间在HSPR工作或接受高等教育的个人进行了六个焦点小组的虚拟调查。我们寻求HSPR人员对DEI倡议、工作和教育环境、经验和气候的看法,以及改善HSPR中DEI的建议。我们开发了一个结构化的代码本,并应用演绎方法进行主题分析。结果:在27名参与者中,近一半的参与者被确定为黑人/非裔美国人(44%);大多数是女性(81%)。出现了三个主要主题:(1)HSPR工作和教育空间使少数HSPR受到一系列排斥和有害做法的影响;(2) DEI举措未能解决制度变革的需要;(3)通过与政策制定者合作并为政策制定者服务,hspr独特地受到不断变化的政治环境的影响,这些政治环境加剧了种族主义。讨论:尽管越来越多的人致力于增加HSPR劳动力的多样性,并改善HSPR工作场所的公平和包容性,但研究结果表明,需要更多有意识和以行动为导向的工作,特别是强调工作场所各个层面的包容和公平的工作。健康公平的影响:研究结果为必要的工作场所和教育改革提供了重要的见解,以发展促进人口健康公平和以公平为导向的政策制定所必需的劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Hostile Workplaces and Educational Spaces Within Health Services and Policy Research.

Introduction: The representation of ethnoracial minoritized individuals in health services and policy research (HSPR) has increased in recent years. However, previous literature has exposed a need to acknowledge and attend to inequities within the HSPR workforce.

Methods: To describe educational and workplace experiences that characterize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the HSPR profession. In this qualitative study, six focus groups were conducted virtually via Zoom with 27 individuals who reported working or pursuing higher education in HSPR from December 2020 to January 2021. We sought HSPRers perspectives on DEI initiatives, work and educational environments, experiences, and climate, and recommendations for improving DEI in HSPR. We developed a structured codebook and applied a deductive approach to conduct thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 27 participants, nearly half of participants identified as Black/African American (44%); most were women (81%). Three major themes emerged: (1) HSPR work and education spaces subject minoritized HSPRs to a range of exclusionary and harmful practices; (2) DEI initiatives fail to address the need for institutional change; and (3) by working with and for policymakers, HSPRs are uniquely subjected to shifting political contexts that reinforce racism.

Discussion: Despite an increasing commitment to increasing the diversity of the HSPR workforce and improving equity and inclusion in the HSPR workplace, the findings suggest that more intentional and action-oriented work is needed, especially work that emphasizes inclusion and equity across various levels of the workplace.

Health equity implications: The findings offer critical insight on necessary workplace and educational reform to develop the workforce necessary to advance population health equity and equity-oriented policy making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信