直肠前切除术后保护性回肠造口术(PICARR):一项决策探索性国际调查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Andrea Balla, Federica Saraceno, Marika Rullo, Salvador Morales-Conde, Eduardo M Targarona Soler, Salomone Di Saverio, Mario Guerrieri, Pasquale Lepiane, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Michel Adamina, Isaias Alarcón, Alberto Arezzo, Jesus Bollo Rodriguez, Luigi Boni, Sebastiano Biondo, Francesco Maria Carrano, Manish Chand, John T Jenkins, Justin Davies, Salvadora Delgado Rivilla, Paolo Delrio, Ugo Elmore, Eloy Espin-Basany, Alessandro Fichera, Blas Flor Lorente, Nader Francis, Marcos Gómez Ruiz, Dieter Hahnloser, Eugenio Licardie, Carmen Martinez, Monica Ortenzi, Yves Panis, Carlos Pastor Idoate, Alessandro M Paganini, Miguel Pera, Roberto Perinotti, Daniel A Popowich, Timothy Rockall, Riccardo Rosati, Alberto Sartori, Daniele Scoglio, Mostafa Shalaby, Vicente Simó Fernández, Neil J Smart, Antonino Spinelli, Patricia Sylla, Pieter J Tanis, Javier Valdes Hernandez, Steven D Wexner, Pierpaolo Sileri
{"title":"直肠前切除术后保护性回肠造口术(PICARR):一项决策探索性国际调查。","authors":"Andrea Balla, Federica Saraceno, Marika Rullo, Salvador Morales-Conde, Eduardo M Targarona Soler, Salomone Di Saverio, Mario Guerrieri, Pasquale Lepiane, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Michel Adamina, Isaias Alarcón, Alberto Arezzo, Jesus Bollo Rodriguez, Luigi Boni, Sebastiano Biondo, Francesco Maria Carrano, Manish Chand, John T Jenkins, Justin Davies, Salvadora Delgado Rivilla, Paolo Delrio, Ugo Elmore, Eloy Espin-Basany, Alessandro Fichera, Blas Flor Lorente, Nader Francis, Marcos Gómez Ruiz, Dieter Hahnloser, Eugenio Licardie, Carmen Martinez, Monica Ortenzi, Yves Panis, Carlos Pastor Idoate, Alessandro M Paganini, Miguel Pera, Roberto Perinotti, Daniel A Popowich, Timothy Rockall, Riccardo Rosati, Alberto Sartori, Daniele Scoglio, Mostafa Shalaby, Vicente Simó Fernández, Neil J Smart, Antonino Spinelli, Patricia Sylla, Pieter J Tanis, Javier Valdes Hernandez, Steven D Wexner, Pierpaolo Sileri","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02111-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In our previous survey of experts, surgeon's decision-making process (DMP) about protective ileostomy (PI) creation after anterior resection was investigated. Based on our previous data, a multiple choice questionnaire has been developed. The aim is to perform a quantitative analysis of the results obtained from an international survey and to describe the clinical practice worldwide. Ten questions were related to participants' demographics and, 20 questions (of which 17 Likert scale questions) investigated the DMP regarding PI creation. To evaluate the tendency of the answers in the Likert-type questions, the mean of the answers obtained was compared with the mean point of the Likert scale. The survey was completed by 1019 physicians. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge ≤ 10 cm were each considered alone sufficient to justify creation of a PI, with statistically significant differences in comparison to the mean point of the scales in (p =  < 0.0001 in both cases). Total Mesorectal Excision alone was not considered a factor sufficient to create a PI (p = 0.416). Most of the participants agree to define their approach to create a PI \"tailored\" to patients' risk factors (p =  < 0.0001) and \"influenced by my experience\" in case of patients with low/moderate risk of anastomotic leakage (p =  < 0.0001). This study provides useful insights on the worldwide clinical practice regarding creation of PI following anterior resection. Given the lack of standardization and evidence-based guidelines, this analysis may be helpful to assist surgeons' practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum (PICARR): a decision-making exploring international survey.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Balla, Federica Saraceno, Marika Rullo, Salvador Morales-Conde, Eduardo M Targarona Soler, Salomone Di Saverio, Mario Guerrieri, Pasquale Lepiane, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Michel Adamina, Isaias Alarcón, Alberto Arezzo, Jesus Bollo Rodriguez, Luigi Boni, Sebastiano Biondo, Francesco Maria Carrano, Manish Chand, John T Jenkins, Justin Davies, Salvadora Delgado Rivilla, Paolo Delrio, Ugo Elmore, Eloy Espin-Basany, Alessandro Fichera, Blas Flor Lorente, Nader Francis, Marcos Gómez Ruiz, Dieter Hahnloser, Eugenio Licardie, Carmen Martinez, Monica Ortenzi, Yves Panis, Carlos Pastor Idoate, Alessandro M Paganini, Miguel Pera, Roberto Perinotti, Daniel A Popowich, Timothy Rockall, Riccardo Rosati, Alberto Sartori, Daniele Scoglio, Mostafa Shalaby, Vicente Simó Fernández, Neil J Smart, Antonino Spinelli, Patricia Sylla, Pieter J Tanis, Javier Valdes Hernandez, Steven D Wexner, Pierpaolo Sileri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02111-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In our previous survey of experts, surgeon's decision-making process (DMP) about protective ileostomy (PI) creation after anterior resection was investigated. Based on our previous data, a multiple choice questionnaire has been developed. The aim is to perform a quantitative analysis of the results obtained from an international survey and to describe the clinical practice worldwide. Ten questions were related to participants' demographics and, 20 questions (of which 17 Likert scale questions) investigated the DMP regarding PI creation. To evaluate the tendency of the answers in the Likert-type questions, the mean of the answers obtained was compared with the mean point of the Likert scale. The survey was completed by 1019 physicians. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge ≤ 10 cm were each considered alone sufficient to justify creation of a PI, with statistically significant differences in comparison to the mean point of the scales in (p =  < 0.0001 in both cases). Total Mesorectal Excision alone was not considered a factor sufficient to create a PI (p = 0.416). Most of the participants agree to define their approach to create a PI \\\"tailored\\\" to patients' risk factors (p =  < 0.0001) and \\\"influenced by my experience\\\" in case of patients with low/moderate risk of anastomotic leakage (p =  < 0.0001). This study provides useful insights on the worldwide clinical practice regarding creation of PI following anterior resection. Given the lack of standardization and evidence-based guidelines, this analysis may be helpful to assist surgeons' practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02111-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02111-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们之前的专家调查中,研究了外科医生在前切除术后关于保护性回肠造口的决策过程(DMP)。基于我们之前的数据,我们开发了一份选择题问卷。目的是对从国际调查中获得的结果进行定量分析,并描述全世界的临床实践。10个问题与参与者的人口统计数据有关,20个问题(其中17个是李克特量表问题)调查了关于PI创建的DMP。为了评估李克特型问题中答案的倾向性,将得到的答案的均值与李克特量表的均值点进行比较。该调查由1019名医生完成。新辅助放化疗和吻合口距肛门边缘≤10 cm的距离均被认为足以证明PI的建立,与(p =)中量表的平均值相比具有统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum (PICARR): a decision-making exploring international survey.

In our previous survey of experts, surgeon's decision-making process (DMP) about protective ileostomy (PI) creation after anterior resection was investigated. Based on our previous data, a multiple choice questionnaire has been developed. The aim is to perform a quantitative analysis of the results obtained from an international survey and to describe the clinical practice worldwide. Ten questions were related to participants' demographics and, 20 questions (of which 17 Likert scale questions) investigated the DMP regarding PI creation. To evaluate the tendency of the answers in the Likert-type questions, the mean of the answers obtained was compared with the mean point of the Likert scale. The survey was completed by 1019 physicians. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge ≤ 10 cm were each considered alone sufficient to justify creation of a PI, with statistically significant differences in comparison to the mean point of the scales in (p =  < 0.0001 in both cases). Total Mesorectal Excision alone was not considered a factor sufficient to create a PI (p = 0.416). Most of the participants agree to define their approach to create a PI "tailored" to patients' risk factors (p =  < 0.0001) and "influenced by my experience" in case of patients with low/moderate risk of anastomotic leakage (p =  < 0.0001). This study provides useful insights on the worldwide clinical practice regarding creation of PI following anterior resection. Given the lack of standardization and evidence-based guidelines, this analysis may be helpful to assist surgeons' practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信