Elise J. Van Polen, Chiel J. Franssen, Jean H.T. Daemen, Austin J. Isabella, Aimée J.P.M. Franssen, Karel W.E. Hulsewé, Yvonne L.J. Vissers, Erik R. de Loos
{"title":"微创漏斗胸修复术后疼痛处理:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Elise J. Van Polen, Chiel J. Franssen, Jean H.T. Daemen, Austin J. Isabella, Aimée J.P.M. Franssen, Karel W.E. Hulsewé, Yvonne L.J. Vissers, Erik R. de Loos","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is the accepted standard approach for correction of pectus excavatum. This procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain, which is the dominant factor determining the duration of hospitalization. To date, a multitude of analgesic modalities are used, however, the most effective is to be corroborated. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare all available analgesic modalities for pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through a network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic scientific databases were systematically searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion when designed as a comparative study evaluating perioperative pain management techniques for patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and where length of hospitalization was reported as an outcome. Data concerning length of hospitalization were extracted and submitted for network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine studies were included, enrolling 4241 patients. Through a network meta-analysis intercostal nerve cryoablation with an adjunct analgesic intervention (e.g., intercostal nerve block or patient controlled analgesia) showed a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospitalization ranging from 0.9 days (95 % confidence interval (CI): −1.7 to −0.1) when compared to locoregional blocks with an adjunct analgesic intervention to 2.5 days (95 % CI: −3.7 to −1.3) when compared to thoracic epidural analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Regarding postoperative pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, intercostal nerve cryoablation with adjunct analgesic intervention is more effective in terms of length of hospitalization compared to other forms of analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Systemic review and meta analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"Article 162282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Pain Management After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Elise J. Van Polen, Chiel J. Franssen, Jean H.T. Daemen, Austin J. Isabella, Aimée J.P.M. Franssen, Karel W.E. Hulsewé, Yvonne L.J. Vissers, Erik R. de Loos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is the accepted standard approach for correction of pectus excavatum. This procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain, which is the dominant factor determining the duration of hospitalization. To date, a multitude of analgesic modalities are used, however, the most effective is to be corroborated. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare all available analgesic modalities for pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through a network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic scientific databases were systematically searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion when designed as a comparative study evaluating perioperative pain management techniques for patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and where length of hospitalization was reported as an outcome. Data concerning length of hospitalization were extracted and submitted for network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine studies were included, enrolling 4241 patients. Through a network meta-analysis intercostal nerve cryoablation with an adjunct analgesic intervention (e.g., intercostal nerve block or patient controlled analgesia) showed a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospitalization ranging from 0.9 days (95 % confidence interval (CI): −1.7 to −0.1) when compared to locoregional blocks with an adjunct analgesic intervention to 2.5 days (95 % CI: −3.7 to −1.3) when compared to thoracic epidural analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Regarding postoperative pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, intercostal nerve cryoablation with adjunct analgesic intervention is more effective in terms of length of hospitalization compared to other forms of analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Systemic review and meta analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 162282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative Pain Management After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Background
Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is the accepted standard approach for correction of pectus excavatum. This procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain, which is the dominant factor determining the duration of hospitalization. To date, a multitude of analgesic modalities are used, however, the most effective is to be corroborated. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare all available analgesic modalities for pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through a network meta-analysis.
Methods
Electronic scientific databases were systematically searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion when designed as a comparative study evaluating perioperative pain management techniques for patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and where length of hospitalization was reported as an outcome. Data concerning length of hospitalization were extracted and submitted for network meta-analysis.
Results
Thirty-nine studies were included, enrolling 4241 patients. Through a network meta-analysis intercostal nerve cryoablation with an adjunct analgesic intervention (e.g., intercostal nerve block or patient controlled analgesia) showed a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospitalization ranging from 0.9 days (95 % confidence interval (CI): −1.7 to −0.1) when compared to locoregional blocks with an adjunct analgesic intervention to 2.5 days (95 % CI: −3.7 to −1.3) when compared to thoracic epidural analgesia.
Conclusion
Regarding postoperative pain management after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, intercostal nerve cryoablation with adjunct analgesic intervention is more effective in terms of length of hospitalization compared to other forms of analgesia.
期刊介绍:
The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.