单克隆抗体作为切除黑色素瘤的辅助治疗。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2484305
Islam Eljilany, Julia R Garcia, Basmala Jamal, Ahmad A Tarhini
{"title":"单克隆抗体作为切除黑色素瘤的辅助治疗。","authors":"Islam Eljilany, Julia R Garcia, Basmala Jamal, Ahmad A Tarhini","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2484305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high-risk, resected melanoma to reduce recurrence risk and potentially improve survival rates. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target immune checkpoints and have made significant advances as systemic adjuvant therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses the main clinical trials that tested adjuvant mAbs in resected high-risk melanoma, including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1); in addition to newer immunotherapies being tested in the adjuvant setting, including anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). We also briefly discuss targeted therapies as an alternative choice. Moreover, we highlight the pros and cons of using mAbs in the adjuvant setting, the reported adverse events (AEs), and the quality of life impact. Finally, we report data related to biomarker studies tested in the context of these clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. The long-term impact on overall survival (OS) was demonstrated in two trials that tested ipilimumab as compared to placebo (EORTC18071) and interferon-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609). Furthermore, emerging data with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy utilizing ICIs have demonstrated improved outcomes in the management of locoregionally advanced disease when compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monoclonal antibodies as adjuvant therapies for resected melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Islam Eljilany, Julia R Garcia, Basmala Jamal, Ahmad A Tarhini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2484305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high-risk, resected melanoma to reduce recurrence risk and potentially improve survival rates. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target immune checkpoints and have made significant advances as systemic adjuvant therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review discusses the main clinical trials that tested adjuvant mAbs in resected high-risk melanoma, including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1); in addition to newer immunotherapies being tested in the adjuvant setting, including anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). We also briefly discuss targeted therapies as an alternative choice. Moreover, we highlight the pros and cons of using mAbs in the adjuvant setting, the reported adverse events (AEs), and the quality of life impact. Finally, we report data related to biomarker studies tested in the context of these clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. The long-term impact on overall survival (OS) was demonstrated in two trials that tested ipilimumab as compared to placebo (EORTC18071) and interferon-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609). Furthermore, emerging data with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy utilizing ICIs have demonstrated improved outcomes in the management of locoregionally advanced disease when compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2484305\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2484305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统性辅助治疗适用于高风险、切除黑色素瘤的患者,以降低复发风险,并可能提高生存率。单克隆抗体(mab)靶向免疫检查点,作为辅助治疗已取得重大进展。本综述讨论了在切除的高风险黑色素瘤中检测佐剂单克隆抗体的主要临床试验,包括抗细胞毒性t淋巴细胞抗原-4 (CTLA-4)和抗程序性细胞死亡-1 (PD-1);此外,新的免疫疗法正在测试辅助设置,包括抗淋巴细胞活化基因3 (LAG-3)。我们还简要讨论了靶向治疗作为另一种选择。此外,我们强调了在辅助治疗中使用单克隆抗体的利弊,报告的不良事件(ae)和生活质量的影响。最后,我们报告了与这些临床试验背景下测试的生物标志物研究相关的数据。专家意见:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)作为高风险黑色素瘤的辅助治疗已被证明可显著提高无复发生存率(RFS)。相比之下,ipilimumab与安慰剂(EORTC18071)和干扰素-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609)的两项研究证实了对总生存期(OS)的长期影响。此外,利用ICIs进行手术和辅助治疗后的新辅助治疗的新数据表明,在局部区域晚期疾病的治疗中,效果有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monoclonal antibodies as adjuvant therapies for resected melanoma.

Introduction: Systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high-risk, resected melanoma to reduce recurrence risk and potentially improve survival rates. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target immune checkpoints and have made significant advances as systemic adjuvant therapies.

Areas covered: This review discusses the main clinical trials that tested adjuvant mAbs in resected high-risk melanoma, including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1); in addition to newer immunotherapies being tested in the adjuvant setting, including anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). We also briefly discuss targeted therapies as an alternative choice. Moreover, we highlight the pros and cons of using mAbs in the adjuvant setting, the reported adverse events (AEs), and the quality of life impact. Finally, we report data related to biomarker studies tested in the context of these clinical trials.

Expert opinion: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. The long-term impact on overall survival (OS) was demonstrated in two trials that tested ipilimumab as compared to placebo (EORTC18071) and interferon-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609). Furthermore, emerging data with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy utilizing ICIs have demonstrated improved outcomes in the management of locoregionally advanced disease when compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信