Nicole Santoro, Christoph Schmid, Moniek de Witte, Mieke W. H. Roeven, Victoria Potter, Deborah Richardson, Thomas Schroeder, Veronika Válková, Katherine Clesham, Sandrine Loron, Jakob Passweg, Caroline Besley, Bernd Gruhn, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Jarl E. Mooyaart, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Simona Pagliuca, Federico Simonetta, Giorgia Battipaglia, Thierry Guillaume, Mette D. Hazenberg, Florent Malard, Jürgen Kuball, Annalisa Ruggeri
{"title":"欧洲同种异体干细胞移植后供体淋巴细胞输注的当前使用:代表EBMT细胞治疗和免疫生物学工作组的一项调查。","authors":"Nicole Santoro, Christoph Schmid, Moniek de Witte, Mieke W. H. Roeven, Victoria Potter, Deborah Richardson, Thomas Schroeder, Veronika Válková, Katherine Clesham, Sandrine Loron, Jakob Passweg, Caroline Besley, Bernd Gruhn, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Jarl E. Mooyaart, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Simona Pagliuca, Federico Simonetta, Giorgia Battipaglia, Thierry Guillaume, Mette D. Hazenberg, Florent Malard, Jürgen Kuball, Annalisa Ruggeri","doi":"10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.","PeriodicalId":9126,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","volume":"60 5","pages":"697-701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Santoro, Christoph Schmid, Moniek de Witte, Mieke W. H. Roeven, Victoria Potter, Deborah Richardson, Thomas Schroeder, Veronika Válková, Katherine Clesham, Sandrine Loron, Jakob Passweg, Caroline Besley, Bernd Gruhn, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Jarl E. Mooyaart, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega, Simona Pagliuca, Federico Simonetta, Giorgia Battipaglia, Thierry Guillaume, Mette D. Hazenberg, Florent Malard, Jürgen Kuball, Annalisa Ruggeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"697-701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02555-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02555-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT
Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.
期刊介绍:
Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes high quality, peer reviewed original research that addresses all aspects of basic biology and clinical use of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.
The broad scope of the journal thus encompasses topics such as stem cell biology, e.g., kinetics and cytokine control, transplantation immunology e.g., HLA and matching techniques, translational research, and clinical results of specific transplant protocols. Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes 24 issues a year.