家庭远程tdcs治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症:可行性、安全性和初步疗效。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sangeetha Madhavan, Shravni Deshmukh, Mark Cummings, Aditi Doshi, Kourosh Rezania, Sally Freels, Gina Sawa
{"title":"家庭远程tdcs治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症:可行性、安全性和初步疗效。","authors":"Sangeetha Madhavan, Shravni Deshmukh, Mark Cummings, Aditi Doshi, Kourosh Rezania, Sally Freels, Gina Sawa","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise as a neuromodulatory intervention in various neurological disorders, but its application in ALS, particularly in a remote, home-based format, remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of remotely supervised tele-tDCS in ALS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blinded pilot study included 14 spinal-onset ALS participants randomized into two groups: the intervention group received 72 tele-tDCS sessions over 24 weeks, and the delayed-start group received 36 sham sessions followed by 36 tele-tDCS sessions. Stimulation was delivered at 2 mA for 20 min 3 times a week. Primary outcomes included feasibility, safety, and disease progression measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Adherence and adverse effects were monitored throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants completed the study, with an overall compliance rate of 98.3%. No serious adverse events were reported, and mild side effects, like itching and tingling, were consistent with tDCS literature. The intervention group demonstrated a significantly slower decline in ALSFRS-R scores than the delayed-start group. At 24 weeks, the intervention group had a mean ALSFRS-R change of -1.7, compared to -13.6 in the delayed-start group (p = 0.0018). Additionally, the change in ALSFRS-R between pre- and mid-intervention significantly differed between groups (p = 0.0071).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tele-tDCS was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in individuals with ALS. Preliminary efficacy results suggest that tele-tDCS may slow disease progression, underscoring the potential of tele-tDCS as a promising home-based neuromodulatory intervention in ALS management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial registration: NCT04866771.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-Based Tele-tDCS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Sangeetha Madhavan, Shravni Deshmukh, Mark Cummings, Aditi Doshi, Kourosh Rezania, Sally Freels, Gina Sawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise as a neuromodulatory intervention in various neurological disorders, but its application in ALS, particularly in a remote, home-based format, remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of remotely supervised tele-tDCS in ALS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blinded pilot study included 14 spinal-onset ALS participants randomized into two groups: the intervention group received 72 tele-tDCS sessions over 24 weeks, and the delayed-start group received 36 sham sessions followed by 36 tele-tDCS sessions. Stimulation was delivered at 2 mA for 20 min 3 times a week. Primary outcomes included feasibility, safety, and disease progression measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Adherence and adverse effects were monitored throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants completed the study, with an overall compliance rate of 98.3%. No serious adverse events were reported, and mild side effects, like itching and tingling, were consistent with tDCS literature. The intervention group demonstrated a significantly slower decline in ALSFRS-R scores than the delayed-start group. At 24 weeks, the intervention group had a mean ALSFRS-R change of -1.7, compared to -13.6 in the delayed-start group (p = 0.0018). Additionally, the change in ALSFRS-R between pre- and mid-intervention significantly differed between groups (p = 0.0071).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tele-tDCS was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in individuals with ALS. Preliminary efficacy results suggest that tele-tDCS may slow disease progression, underscoring the potential of tele-tDCS as a promising home-based neuromodulatory intervention in ALS management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial registration: NCT04866771.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,治疗方案有限。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为一种神经调节干预在各种神经系统疾病中显示出前景,但其在ALS中的应用,特别是在远程,基于家庭的形式,仍未得到充分探索。本研究探讨了远程监控远程tdcs在ALS患者中的可行性、安全性和初步疗效。方法:这项双盲先导研究包括14名脊髓性ALS患者,随机分为两组:干预组在24周内接受72次远程tdcs治疗,延迟启动组接受36次假治疗,随后接受36次远程tdcs治疗。每周3次,每次2毫安,持续20分钟。主要结局包括可行性、安全性和ALS功能评定量表-修订版(ALSFRS-R)测量的疾病进展。全程监测依从性和不良反应。结果:10名参与者完成了研究,总体依从率为98.3%。没有严重不良事件的报道,轻微的副作用,如瘙痒和刺痛,与tDCS文献一致。干预组ALSFRS-R评分下降明显慢于延迟启动组。在24周时,干预组的平均ALSFRS-R变化为-1.7,而延迟启动组为-13.6 (p = 0.0018)。此外,ALSFRS-R在干预前和干预中期的变化在组间有显著差异(p = 0.0071)。结论:远程tdcs在ALS患者中是可行、安全且耐受性良好的。初步疗效结果表明,远程tdcs可能减缓疾病进展,强调远程tdcs作为一种有前途的家庭神经调节干预治疗ALS的潜力。临床试验注册:NCT04866771。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home-Based Tele-tDCS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy.

Objective: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise as a neuromodulatory intervention in various neurological disorders, but its application in ALS, particularly in a remote, home-based format, remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of remotely supervised tele-tDCS in ALS patients.

Methods: This double-blinded pilot study included 14 spinal-onset ALS participants randomized into two groups: the intervention group received 72 tele-tDCS sessions over 24 weeks, and the delayed-start group received 36 sham sessions followed by 36 tele-tDCS sessions. Stimulation was delivered at 2 mA for 20 min 3 times a week. Primary outcomes included feasibility, safety, and disease progression measured by the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Adherence and adverse effects were monitored throughout.

Results: Ten participants completed the study, with an overall compliance rate of 98.3%. No serious adverse events were reported, and mild side effects, like itching and tingling, were consistent with tDCS literature. The intervention group demonstrated a significantly slower decline in ALSFRS-R scores than the delayed-start group. At 24 weeks, the intervention group had a mean ALSFRS-R change of -1.7, compared to -13.6 in the delayed-start group (p = 0.0018). Additionally, the change in ALSFRS-R between pre- and mid-intervention significantly differed between groups (p = 0.0071).

Interpretation: Tele-tDCS was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in individuals with ALS. Preliminary efficacy results suggest that tele-tDCS may slow disease progression, underscoring the potential of tele-tDCS as a promising home-based neuromodulatory intervention in ALS management.

Trial registration: Clinical trial registration: NCT04866771.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信