Jenny T. Le, Alison E. J. Mahoney, Jay L. Court, Christine T. Shiner
{"title":"澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区数字心理健康使用的障碍和促进因素:临床医生和消费者观点的比较","authors":"Jenny T. Le, Alison E. J. Mahoney, Jay L. Court, Christine T. Shiner","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Consumers living in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia face significant barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a promising avenue to improve access to mental health treatment in these areas, but uptake has yet to reach its full potential.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the perceived barriers and facilitators of engagement with DMHIs for clinicians and consumers in regional, rural, and remote Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods, Design, and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We surveyed consumers (<i>n</i> = 896) and clinicians (<i>n</i> = 104) using cross-sectional surveys to examine perceived barriers and facilitators of DMHI use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted within the context of an established digital mental health service, THIS WAY UP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Survey responses were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model, and quantitative analyses of response frequencies partitioned the influence of each factor on engagement with DMHIs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians and consumers familiar with DMHIs reported barriers that spanned capability, opportunity, and motivation domains. Lack of consumer motivation was the most frequent barrier perceived by clinicians (51%) and reported by consumers (27%). Consumers valued many accessibility benefits of DMHIs and frequently endorsed the importance of clinicians in facilitating their use of DMHIs by supporting knowledge and motivation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DMHIs have the potential to alleviate service-related barriers to mental healthcare in regional/remote areas, and successful implementation must consider both clinician and consumer perspectives. Our findings underscore several capability, opportunity, and motivational targets for improving consumer and clinician engagement with DMHI in these areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Mental Health Use in Regional, Rural, and Remote Australia: A Comparison of Clinician and Consumer Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Jenny T. Le, Alison E. J. Mahoney, Jay L. Court, Christine T. Shiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Consumers living in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia face significant barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a promising avenue to improve access to mental health treatment in these areas, but uptake has yet to reach its full potential.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the perceived barriers and facilitators of engagement with DMHIs for clinicians and consumers in regional, rural, and remote Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods, Design, and Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>We surveyed consumers (<i>n</i> = 896) and clinicians (<i>n</i> = 104) using cross-sectional surveys to examine perceived barriers and facilitators of DMHI use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was conducted within the context of an established digital mental health service, THIS WAY UP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Survey responses were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model, and quantitative analyses of response frequencies partitioned the influence of each factor on engagement with DMHIs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinicians and consumers familiar with DMHIs reported barriers that spanned capability, opportunity, and motivation domains. Lack of consumer motivation was the most frequent barrier perceived by clinicians (51%) and reported by consumers (27%). Consumers valued many accessibility benefits of DMHIs and frequently endorsed the importance of clinicians in facilitating their use of DMHIs by supporting knowledge and motivation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>DMHIs have the potential to alleviate service-related barriers to mental healthcare in regional/remote areas, and successful implementation must consider both clinician and consumer perspectives. Our findings underscore several capability, opportunity, and motivational targets for improving consumer and clinician engagement with DMHI in these areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生活在澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的消费者在获得精神保健方面面临着重大障碍。数字精神卫生干预措施(DMHIs)是改善这些地区获得精神卫生治疗的一个有希望的途径,但吸收尚未充分发挥其潜力。目的本研究评估了澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区临床医生和消费者参与DMHIs的感知障碍和促进因素。方法、设计和参与者我们使用横断面调查对消费者(n = 896)和临床医生(n = 104)进行了调查,以检查使用DMHI的感知障碍和促进因素。本研究是在一个已建立的数字心理健康服务This WAY UP的背景下进行的。调查结果被映射到能力、机会、动机、行为(COM-B)模型中,对响应频率的定量分析划分了每个因素对参与DMHIs的影响。结果临床医生和熟悉DMHIs的消费者报告了跨越能力、机会和动机领域的障碍。缺乏消费者动机是临床医生(51%)和消费者(27%)报告的最常见障碍。消费者重视DMHIs的许多可及性好处,并经常认可临床医生通过支持知识和动机来促进他们使用DMHIs的重要性。结论DMHIs有可能缓解地区/偏远地区精神卫生服务相关障碍,成功实施必须考虑临床医生和消费者的观点。我们的研究结果强调了几个能力、机会和激励目标,以提高消费者和临床医生在这些领域与DMHI的接触。
Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Mental Health Use in Regional, Rural, and Remote Australia: A Comparison of Clinician and Consumer Perspectives
Introduction
Consumers living in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia face significant barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a promising avenue to improve access to mental health treatment in these areas, but uptake has yet to reach its full potential.
Objective
This study evaluated the perceived barriers and facilitators of engagement with DMHIs for clinicians and consumers in regional, rural, and remote Australia.
Methods, Design, and Participants
We surveyed consumers (n = 896) and clinicians (n = 104) using cross-sectional surveys to examine perceived barriers and facilitators of DMHI use.
Setting
This study was conducted within the context of an established digital mental health service, THIS WAY UP.
Main Outcome Measures
Survey responses were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model, and quantitative analyses of response frequencies partitioned the influence of each factor on engagement with DMHIs.
Results
Clinicians and consumers familiar with DMHIs reported barriers that spanned capability, opportunity, and motivation domains. Lack of consumer motivation was the most frequent barrier perceived by clinicians (51%) and reported by consumers (27%). Consumers valued many accessibility benefits of DMHIs and frequently endorsed the importance of clinicians in facilitating their use of DMHIs by supporting knowledge and motivation.
Conclusions
DMHIs have the potential to alleviate service-related barriers to mental healthcare in regional/remote areas, and successful implementation must consider both clinician and consumer perspectives. Our findings underscore several capability, opportunity, and motivational targets for improving consumer and clinician engagement with DMHI in these areas.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.