对急诊科颅内危重病人的团队治疗方法进行评估

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Skye Macleod FACEM, M.Med (Crit Care), BSc (Hons), Geoffrey Melville PhD, BAppSc, Aden Samimi-Duncan DMed, Shanawaz Khan MBBS, AFIH, FACEM, Simon Binks FACEM, BMedSci, BM, BS, Daniel Hernandez MBChB, FANZCA, Ravi Cherukuri MBBS, MCh, DNB (Neurosurgery), FRACS (Neurosurgery), Simon Keane FACEM, BSc (Aerospace Phys), MBBS, Kate Curtis RN, PhD, FCENA, FAAN
{"title":"对急诊科颅内危重病人的团队治疗方法进行评估","authors":"Skye Macleod FACEM, M.Med (Crit Care), BSc (Hons),&nbsp;Geoffrey Melville PhD, BAppSc,&nbsp;Aden Samimi-Duncan DMed,&nbsp;Shanawaz Khan MBBS, AFIH, FACEM,&nbsp;Simon Binks FACEM, BMedSci, BM, BS,&nbsp;Daniel Hernandez MBChB, FANZCA,&nbsp;Ravi Cherukuri MBBS, MCh, DNB (Neurosurgery), FRACS (Neurosurgery),&nbsp;Simon Keane FACEM, BSc (Aerospace Phys), MBBS,&nbsp;Kate Curtis RN, PhD, FCENA, FAAN","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Many time-critical neurosurgical brain conditions do not meet traditional ED major trauma or stroke team activation criteria and thus do not benefit from the associated expedited imaging and specialist review. To address this, a “Critical Head” protocol was developed. The aim was to determine the effect of this on time to CT scan, neurosurgical intervention (if indicated) and specialist team review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Quasi-experimental study, involving retrospective analyses of data of all potential Critical Head patients presenting to Wollongong ED from 1 January 2018 to 26 May 2023, with the protocol go-live on 7 March 2023. Descriptive statistics and study outcomes were compared before and after protocol implementation. R Studio 2024 was used for analyses and alpha was set to 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and two patients were included (123 control/pre-intervention, 119 intervention). There was no significant difference in age, sex or presence of intracranial conditions between groups. Median time from triage to CT decreased in the intervention group by 15% (7 min, 47[33,95] to 40[25,66], <i>P</i> = 0.020). There was a 33% (67 min) reduction to surgery start time in the intervention (204[621752] to 137[108247] min, <i>P</i> = 0.042) (urgent neurosurgery). Reductions in time to specialist team reviews were observed in ICU (<i>n</i> = 86, 132[58192] to 42[6103] min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and neurosurgery (<i>n</i> = 158, 104[69 202] to 44[16111] min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ significantly, nor did Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale score at discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Critical Head protocol for patients with time-critical intracranial conditions reduced time to CT scan, operative intervention and specialist team review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a team-based approach for emergency department patients with time critical intracranial conditions\",\"authors\":\"Skye Macleod FACEM, M.Med (Crit Care), BSc (Hons),&nbsp;Geoffrey Melville PhD, BAppSc,&nbsp;Aden Samimi-Duncan DMed,&nbsp;Shanawaz Khan MBBS, AFIH, FACEM,&nbsp;Simon Binks FACEM, BMedSci, BM, BS,&nbsp;Daniel Hernandez MBChB, FANZCA,&nbsp;Ravi Cherukuri MBBS, MCh, DNB (Neurosurgery), FRACS (Neurosurgery),&nbsp;Simon Keane FACEM, BSc (Aerospace Phys), MBBS,&nbsp;Kate Curtis RN, PhD, FCENA, FAAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Many time-critical neurosurgical brain conditions do not meet traditional ED major trauma or stroke team activation criteria and thus do not benefit from the associated expedited imaging and specialist review. To address this, a “Critical Head” protocol was developed. The aim was to determine the effect of this on time to CT scan, neurosurgical intervention (if indicated) and specialist team review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quasi-experimental study, involving retrospective analyses of data of all potential Critical Head patients presenting to Wollongong ED from 1 January 2018 to 26 May 2023, with the protocol go-live on 7 March 2023. Descriptive statistics and study outcomes were compared before and after protocol implementation. R Studio 2024 was used for analyses and alpha was set to 0.05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two hundred and two patients were included (123 control/pre-intervention, 119 intervention). There was no significant difference in age, sex or presence of intracranial conditions between groups. Median time from triage to CT decreased in the intervention group by 15% (7 min, 47[33,95] to 40[25,66], <i>P</i> = 0.020). There was a 33% (67 min) reduction to surgery start time in the intervention (204[621752] to 137[108247] min, <i>P</i> = 0.042) (urgent neurosurgery). Reductions in time to specialist team reviews were observed in ICU (<i>n</i> = 86, 132[58192] to 42[6103] min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and neurosurgery (<i>n</i> = 158, 104[69 202] to 44[16111] min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ significantly, nor did Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale score at discharge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Critical Head protocol for patients with time-critical intracranial conditions reduced time to CT scan, operative intervention and specialist team review.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:许多时间紧迫的脑部神经外科疾病不符合传统急诊室重大创伤或中风团队的启动标准,因此无法受益于相关的快速成像和专家审查。为此,我们制定了 "危重头部 "方案。目的是确定该方案对 CT 扫描、神经外科干预(如有指征)和专家团队会诊时间的影响。 方法 准实验研究,包括对 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 26 日期间卧龙岗急诊室所有潜在 "危重头部 "患者的数据进行回顾性分析,协议于 2023 年 3 月 7 日生效。对协议实施前后的描述性统计和研究结果进行了比较。分析使用 R Studio 2024,α设为 0.05。 结果 共纳入 222 名患者(123 名对照组/干预前,119 名干预组)。两组患者在年龄、性别或颅内疾病方面无明显差异。干预组从分诊到 CT 的中位时间缩短了 15%(7 分钟,47[33,95] 到 40[25,66],P = 0.020)。干预组的手术开始时间缩短了 33%(67 分钟)(204[621752] 分钟到 137[108247] 分钟,P = 0.042)(紧急神经外科手术)。在重症监护室(n = 86,132[58192] min 到 42[6103] min,P <0.001)和神经外科(n = 158,104[69 202] min 到 44[16111] min,P <0.001)观察到专家团队复查时间缩短。重症监护室和住院时间以及出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分均无明显差异。 结论 针对时间紧迫的颅内疾病患者的重症头部治疗方案缩短了从 CT 扫描、手术干预到专家团队复查的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a team-based approach for emergency department patients with time critical intracranial conditions

Evaluation of a team-based approach for emergency department patients with time critical intracranial conditions

Introduction

Many time-critical neurosurgical brain conditions do not meet traditional ED major trauma or stroke team activation criteria and thus do not benefit from the associated expedited imaging and specialist review. To address this, a “Critical Head” protocol was developed. The aim was to determine the effect of this on time to CT scan, neurosurgical intervention (if indicated) and specialist team review.

Method

Quasi-experimental study, involving retrospective analyses of data of all potential Critical Head patients presenting to Wollongong ED from 1 January 2018 to 26 May 2023, with the protocol go-live on 7 March 2023. Descriptive statistics and study outcomes were compared before and after protocol implementation. R Studio 2024 was used for analyses and alpha was set to 0.05.

Results

Two hundred and two patients were included (123 control/pre-intervention, 119 intervention). There was no significant difference in age, sex or presence of intracranial conditions between groups. Median time from triage to CT decreased in the intervention group by 15% (7 min, 47[33,95] to 40[25,66], P = 0.020). There was a 33% (67 min) reduction to surgery start time in the intervention (204[621752] to 137[108247] min, P = 0.042) (urgent neurosurgery). Reductions in time to specialist team reviews were observed in ICU (n = 86, 132[58192] to 42[6103] min, P < 0.001) and neurosurgery (n = 158, 104[69 202] to 44[16111] min, P < 0.001). ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ significantly, nor did Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale score at discharge.

Conclusion

The Critical Head protocol for patients with time-critical intracranial conditions reduced time to CT scan, operative intervention and specialist team review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信