{"title":"老年Brugada综合征患者的风险分层:来自日本特发性心室颤动的大型队列的结果","authors":"Tetsuji Shinohara MD, PhD, Masahiko Takagi MD, PhD, Tsukasa Kamakura MD, PhD, Yuki Komatsu MD, PhD, Yoshiyasu Aizawa MD, PhD, Yukio Sekiguchi MD, PhD, Yasuhiro Yokoyama MD, PhD, Naohiko Aihara MD, Masayasu Hiraoka MD, PhD, Kazutaka Aonuma MD, PhD, for the Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study (J-IVFS) Investigators","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the primary therapy for SCD prevention, the risk stratification of elderly patients with BrS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 523 patients with BrS (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 497 men) enrolled in the multicenter prospective Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study. Patients were categorized into the elderly (>60 years, <i>n</i> = 150) and nonelderly (≤60 years, <i>n</i> = 373) groups. Clinical characteristics, programmed electrical stimulation (PES) results, and outcomes, including cardiac events (CEs: VF, fast ventricular tachycardia, or SCD), were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a mean follow-up of 106 ± 62 months, 59 patients (11%) experienced CE. The annual CE incidence was lower in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (0.7% vs. 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.016). History of VF independently predicted CE occurrence in elderly patients (hazard ratio: 23.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Asymptomatic elderly patients exhibited a negligible risk of CE. PES did not predict CE occurrence in the elderly group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Elderly patients with BrS have a better prognosis than nonelderly patients, particularly if they are asymptomatic. A history of VF is a key risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk stratification of elderly patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from a large Japanese cohort of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuji Shinohara MD, PhD, Masahiko Takagi MD, PhD, Tsukasa Kamakura MD, PhD, Yuki Komatsu MD, PhD, Yoshiyasu Aizawa MD, PhD, Yukio Sekiguchi MD, PhD, Yasuhiro Yokoyama MD, PhD, Naohiko Aihara MD, Masayasu Hiraoka MD, PhD, Kazutaka Aonuma MD, PhD, for the Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study (J-IVFS) Investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the primary therapy for SCD prevention, the risk stratification of elderly patients with BrS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed 523 patients with BrS (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 497 men) enrolled in the multicenter prospective Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study. Patients were categorized into the elderly (>60 years, <i>n</i> = 150) and nonelderly (≤60 years, <i>n</i> = 373) groups. Clinical characteristics, programmed electrical stimulation (PES) results, and outcomes, including cardiac events (CEs: VF, fast ventricular tachycardia, or SCD), were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a mean follow-up of 106 ± 62 months, 59 patients (11%) experienced CE. The annual CE incidence was lower in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (0.7% vs. 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.016). History of VF independently predicted CE occurrence in elderly patients (hazard ratio: 23.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Asymptomatic elderly patients exhibited a negligible risk of CE. PES did not predict CE occurrence in the elderly group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Elderly patients with BrS have a better prognosis than nonelderly patients, particularly if they are asymptomatic. A history of VF is a key risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Brugada综合征(BrS)是一种遗传性心脏通道病变,与室性颤动(VF)引起的心源性猝死(SCD)的高风险相关。尽管植入式心律转复除颤器(ICDs)是预防SCD的主要治疗方法,但老年BrS患者的风险分层仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨老年BrS患者危及生命的心律失常的发生率及危险因素。方法我们分析了523例BrS患者(平均年龄51±13岁,497名男性),这些患者参加了多中心前瞻性日本特发性心室颤动研究。患者分为老年组(60岁,n = 150)和非老年组(≤60岁,n = 373)。比较临床特征、程序性电刺激(PES)结果和结果,包括心脏事件(ce: VF、快速室性心动过速或SCD)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。结果平均随访106±62个月,59例(11%)出现CE。年长者组的年CE发生率低于非年长者组(0.7% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.016)。VF病史独立预测老年患者CE的发生(风险比:23.5,p < 0.001)。无症状的老年患者患CE的风险可以忽略不计。PES不能预测老年组CE的发生。结论老年BrS患者的预后优于非老年患者,尤其是无症状患者。房颤史是老年BrS患者发生危及生命的心律失常的关键危险因素。
Risk stratification of elderly patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from a large Japanese cohort of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
Background
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the primary therapy for SCD prevention, the risk stratification of elderly patients with BrS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.
Methods
We analyzed 523 patients with BrS (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 497 men) enrolled in the multicenter prospective Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study. Patients were categorized into the elderly (>60 years, n = 150) and nonelderly (≤60 years, n = 373) groups. Clinical characteristics, programmed electrical stimulation (PES) results, and outcomes, including cardiac events (CEs: VF, fast ventricular tachycardia, or SCD), were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models.
Results
During a mean follow-up of 106 ± 62 months, 59 patients (11%) experienced CE. The annual CE incidence was lower in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (0.7% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.016). History of VF independently predicted CE occurrence in elderly patients (hazard ratio: 23.5, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic elderly patients exhibited a negligible risk of CE. PES did not predict CE occurrence in the elderly group.
Conclusions
Elderly patients with BrS have a better prognosis than nonelderly patients, particularly if they are asymptomatic. A history of VF is a key risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.