{"title":"心内除颤导管放置位置在房颤消融中的疗效","authors":"Jumpei Ohashi MD, PhD, Tatsuya Hayashi MD, PhD, Shingo Yamamoto MD, Yusuke Ugata MD, MPH, Kenichi Sakakura MD, PhD, Hideo Fujita MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), intraoperative defibrillation is often required. Intracardiac defibrillation catheters (ICDCs) are most effective when positioned to enclose the heart between the coronary sinus (CS) and right atrium (RA) (CS/RA configuration). However, achieving this positioning via the inferior vena cava (IVC) can be challenging, and alternative configurations remain underexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent cryoballoon ablation followed by intracardiac cardioversion using an ICDC via the IVC. The catheter was initially positioned with distal electrodes in the CS and proximal electrodes in the IVC (CS-only configuration). If cardioversion failed, the catheter was repositioned to place distal electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC configuration). A maximum of 30 J of energy was used for all cardioversion attempts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 81 patients were included. Cardioversion in the CS-only configuration restored sinus rhythm in 11% (9/81) of patients. Repositioning to the SVC configuration achieved successful cardioversion in 93.1% (67/72) of the remaining cases without complications. Patients requiring the SVC configuration had a significantly higher prevalence of persistent AF (33.3% vs. 80.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.045). No adverse events were observed following cardioversion in the SVC configuration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While the CS-only configuration offers ease of placement, its efficacy is limited. Repositioning to the SVC configuration significantly enhances cardioversion success and represents a safer, more effective alternative for ICDC use during AF ablation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of an alternative positioning of intracardiac defibrillation catheters in atrial fibrillation ablation\",\"authors\":\"Jumpei Ohashi MD, PhD, Tatsuya Hayashi MD, PhD, Shingo Yamamoto MD, Yusuke Ugata MD, MPH, Kenichi Sakakura MD, PhD, Hideo Fujita MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), intraoperative defibrillation is often required. Intracardiac defibrillation catheters (ICDCs) are most effective when positioned to enclose the heart between the coronary sinus (CS) and right atrium (RA) (CS/RA configuration). However, achieving this positioning via the inferior vena cava (IVC) can be challenging, and alternative configurations remain underexplored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent cryoballoon ablation followed by intracardiac cardioversion using an ICDC via the IVC. The catheter was initially positioned with distal electrodes in the CS and proximal electrodes in the IVC (CS-only configuration). If cardioversion failed, the catheter was repositioned to place distal electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC configuration). A maximum of 30 J of energy was used for all cardioversion attempts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 81 patients were included. Cardioversion in the CS-only configuration restored sinus rhythm in 11% (9/81) of patients. Repositioning to the SVC configuration achieved successful cardioversion in 93.1% (67/72) of the remaining cases without complications. Patients requiring the SVC configuration had a significantly higher prevalence of persistent AF (33.3% vs. 80.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.045). No adverse events were observed following cardioversion in the SVC configuration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>While the CS-only configuration offers ease of placement, its efficacy is limited. Repositioning to the SVC configuration significantly enhances cardioversion success and represents a safer, more effective alternative for ICDC use during AF ablation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景在房颤(AF)的肺静脉隔离(PVI)中,通常需要术中除颤。心内除颤导管(ICDCs)放置于冠状窦(CS)和右心房(RA)之间(CS/RA配置)时最有效。然而,通过下腔静脉(IVC)实现这种定位是具有挑战性的,其他配置仍未得到充分探索。方法:本研究纳入阵发性或持续性房颤患者,这些患者接受低温球囊消融,然后通过下腔静脉使用ICDC进行心内转复。导管最初放置远端电极在CS,近端电极在IVC(仅CS配置)。如果心脏复律失败,则重新定位导管,将远端电极放置在上腔静脉(SVC配置)。所有心脏复律尝试最多使用30j的能量。结果共纳入81例患者。仅cs组的心律复律恢复了11%(9/81)的患者的窦性心律。在其余无并发症的病例中,93.1%(67/72)的患者复位至SVC构型,获得了成功的心律转复。需要SVC配置的患者有更高的持续性房颤患病率(33.3% vs. 80.6%;p = 0.045)。在SVC组中,未观察到转复后的不良事件。结论CS-only配置虽然易于放置,但其疗效有限。重新定位至SVC配置可显著提高心律转复成功率,并代表了在房颤消融期间使用ICDC更安全、更有效的替代方案。
Efficacy of an alternative positioning of intracardiac defibrillation catheters in atrial fibrillation ablation
Background
In pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), intraoperative defibrillation is often required. Intracardiac defibrillation catheters (ICDCs) are most effective when positioned to enclose the heart between the coronary sinus (CS) and right atrium (RA) (CS/RA configuration). However, achieving this positioning via the inferior vena cava (IVC) can be challenging, and alternative configurations remain underexplored.
Methods
This study included patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent cryoballoon ablation followed by intracardiac cardioversion using an ICDC via the IVC. The catheter was initially positioned with distal electrodes in the CS and proximal electrodes in the IVC (CS-only configuration). If cardioversion failed, the catheter was repositioned to place distal electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC configuration). A maximum of 30 J of energy was used for all cardioversion attempts.
Results
A total of 81 patients were included. Cardioversion in the CS-only configuration restored sinus rhythm in 11% (9/81) of patients. Repositioning to the SVC configuration achieved successful cardioversion in 93.1% (67/72) of the remaining cases without complications. Patients requiring the SVC configuration had a significantly higher prevalence of persistent AF (33.3% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.045). No adverse events were observed following cardioversion in the SVC configuration.
Conclusions
While the CS-only configuration offers ease of placement, its efficacy is limited. Repositioning to the SVC configuration significantly enhances cardioversion success and represents a safer, more effective alternative for ICDC use during AF ablation.