超声启动者:在点护理超声领域的先驱定性研究

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Judy Lin MD, Michelle Hernandez MD, Shiraz Saleem DO, Arthur Au MD, Ryan Bellinger MD, Jaime Jordan MD, MAEd, Michael Gottlieb MD
{"title":"超声启动者:在点护理超声领域的先驱定性研究","authors":"Judy Lin MD,&nbsp;Michelle Hernandez MD,&nbsp;Shiraz Saleem DO,&nbsp;Arthur Au MD,&nbsp;Ryan Bellinger MD,&nbsp;Jaime Jordan MD, MAEd,&nbsp;Michael Gottlieb MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within emergency medicine (EM) was a new field that has since developed into a robust discipline through the efforts of early EM POCUS pioneers. This study explored the experiences that led to POCUS pioneers' success. These data can inform emerging fields of study including non-EM specialties adopting POCUS as well as other new subspecialties within medicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with physician pioneers in the field of EM POCUS. EM POCUS pioneers were defined as early key contributors to the field of EM POCUS and were identified using combined author networks and purposive, stratified sampling with a snowball sampling technique. A thematic analysis of interviews was performed using a modified grounded theory approach with a constructivist–interpretivist paradigm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve physicians were interviewed in this study. We identified four major themes: career motivators, barriers encountered, promoters of success, and advancement of the field. Career motivators included the need for representation and the ability to impact a new and growing field. Barriers encountered included discouragement by other colleagues, political battles, lack of funding, and rudimentary technology. Participants felt their career success was attributed to guidance from mentors, demonstration of initiative, work ethic, and skills in active listening. Participants felt the field advanced through the creation of national organizations, publication of training and credentialing guidelines, generation of research, and investment into the next generation of POCUS leaders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study identified several key themes in EM POCUS pioneers' careers including motivators, barriers, and methods used to overcome obstacles. Based on these data, we recommend a comprehensive set of strategies to support the advancement of an emerging field. These include early content exposure, mentorship, funding, research and industry collaboration, diversity, national organization involvement, and investment into future leaders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sono-starters: A qualitative study of pioneers in the field of point-of-care ultrasound\",\"authors\":\"Judy Lin MD,&nbsp;Michelle Hernandez MD,&nbsp;Shiraz Saleem DO,&nbsp;Arthur Au MD,&nbsp;Ryan Bellinger MD,&nbsp;Jaime Jordan MD, MAEd,&nbsp;Michael Gottlieb MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within emergency medicine (EM) was a new field that has since developed into a robust discipline through the efforts of early EM POCUS pioneers. This study explored the experiences that led to POCUS pioneers' success. These data can inform emerging fields of study including non-EM specialties adopting POCUS as well as other new subspecialties within medicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with physician pioneers in the field of EM POCUS. EM POCUS pioneers were defined as early key contributors to the field of EM POCUS and were identified using combined author networks and purposive, stratified sampling with a snowball sampling technique. A thematic analysis of interviews was performed using a modified grounded theory approach with a constructivist–interpretivist paradigm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve physicians were interviewed in this study. We identified four major themes: career motivators, barriers encountered, promoters of success, and advancement of the field. Career motivators included the need for representation and the ability to impact a new and growing field. Barriers encountered included discouragement by other colleagues, political battles, lack of funding, and rudimentary technology. Participants felt their career success was attributed to guidance from mentors, demonstration of initiative, work ethic, and skills in active listening. Participants felt the field advanced through the creation of national organizations, publication of training and credentialing guidelines, generation of research, and investment into the next generation of POCUS leaders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study identified several key themes in EM POCUS pioneers' careers including motivators, barriers, and methods used to overcome obstacles. Based on these data, we recommend a comprehensive set of strategies to support the advancement of an emerging field. These include early content exposure, mentorship, funding, research and industry collaboration, diversity, national organization involvement, and investment into future leaders.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急诊医学(EM)中的点护理超声(POCUS)是一个新的领域,经过早期EM POCUS先驱的努力,已经发展成为一个强大的学科。本研究探讨了POCUS先驱者成功的经验。这些数据可以为新兴研究领域提供信息,包括采用POCUS的非em专业以及医学中的其他新亚专业。方法采用半结构化访谈法对EM POCUS领域的医学先驱进行定性研究。EM POCUS先驱被定义为EM POCUS领域的早期关键贡献者,并通过作者网络和有目的的分层抽样和雪球抽样技术进行识别。对访谈进行专题分析,采用改进的扎根理论方法和建构主义-解释主义范式。结果本研究共采访了12名医生。我们确定了四个主要主题:职业激励因素、遇到的障碍、成功的促进因素和领域的进步。职业动机包括需要代表和影响一个新的和不断发展的领域的能力。遇到的障碍包括其他同事的劝阻、政治斗争、缺乏资金和落后的技术。参与者认为他们的事业成功归功于导师的指导、主动性的展示、职业道德和积极倾听的技能。与会者认为,通过建立国家组织、出版培训和资格认证准则、进行研究和投资于下一代POCUS领导人,该领域取得了进步。本研究确定了EM POCUS先驱者职业生涯中的几个关键主题,包括激励因素、障碍和克服障碍的方法。基于这些数据,我们推荐了一套全面的策略来支持新兴领域的发展。这些包括早期内容曝光、指导、资助、研究和行业合作、多样性、国家组织参与以及对未来领导者的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sono-starters: A qualitative study of pioneers in the field of point-of-care ultrasound

Objectives

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within emergency medicine (EM) was a new field that has since developed into a robust discipline through the efforts of early EM POCUS pioneers. This study explored the experiences that led to POCUS pioneers' success. These data can inform emerging fields of study including non-EM specialties adopting POCUS as well as other new subspecialties within medicine.

Methods

This was a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with physician pioneers in the field of EM POCUS. EM POCUS pioneers were defined as early key contributors to the field of EM POCUS and were identified using combined author networks and purposive, stratified sampling with a snowball sampling technique. A thematic analysis of interviews was performed using a modified grounded theory approach with a constructivist–interpretivist paradigm.

Results

Twelve physicians were interviewed in this study. We identified four major themes: career motivators, barriers encountered, promoters of success, and advancement of the field. Career motivators included the need for representation and the ability to impact a new and growing field. Barriers encountered included discouragement by other colleagues, political battles, lack of funding, and rudimentary technology. Participants felt their career success was attributed to guidance from mentors, demonstration of initiative, work ethic, and skills in active listening. Participants felt the field advanced through the creation of national organizations, publication of training and credentialing guidelines, generation of research, and investment into the next generation of POCUS leaders.

Conclusions

This study identified several key themes in EM POCUS pioneers' careers including motivators, barriers, and methods used to overcome obstacles. Based on these data, we recommend a comprehensive set of strategies to support the advancement of an emerging field. These include early content exposure, mentorship, funding, research and industry collaboration, diversity, national organization involvement, and investment into future leaders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信