eDNA元条形码记录置信度评分方法及其在全球海洋鱼类数据集上的应用

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Andrea Polanco F., Romane Rozanski, Virginie Marques, Martin Helmkampf, David Mouillot, Stéphanie Manel, Camille Albouy, Oscar Puebla, Loïc Pellissier
{"title":"eDNA元条形码记录置信度评分方法及其在全球海洋鱼类数据集上的应用","authors":"Andrea Polanco F.,&nbsp;Romane Rozanski,&nbsp;Virginie Marques,&nbsp;Martin Helmkampf,&nbsp;David Mouillot,&nbsp;Stéphanie Manel,&nbsp;Camille Albouy,&nbsp;Oscar Puebla,&nbsp;Loïc Pellissier","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is changing the way biodiversity is surveyed in many types of ecosystems. eDNA surveys are now commonly performed and integrated into biodiversity monitoring programs and public databases. Although it is widely recognized that eDNA records require interpretation in light of taxonomy and biogeography, there remains a range of perceptions about how thoroughly records should be evaluated and which ones should be reported. Here, we present a modular procedure, available as an R script, that uses a set of five steps to assess the confidence of species-level eDNA records by assigning them a score from 0 to 5. This procedure includes evaluations of the known geographic distribution of each taxon, the taxonomic resolution of the marker used, the regional completeness of the reference database, the diversification rate, and the range map of each taxon. We tested the procedure on a large-scale marine fish eDNA dataset (572 samples) covering 15 ecoregions worldwide, from the poles to the tropics, using the <i>teleo</i> marker on the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal gene. Our analysis revealed broad variation in the average confidence score of eDNA records among regions, with the highest scores occurring along the European and Eastern Atlantic coasts. Generalized linear models applied to record covariates highlighted the significant influences of latitude and species richness on low confidence scores (&lt; 2.5). The polar regions notably displayed high proportions of low confidence scores, probably due to the limited completeness of the regional reference databases and the taxonomic resolution of the <i>teleo</i> marker. We conclude that only records with high confidence scores (&gt; 2.5) should be integrated into biodiversity databases. The medium (2.5) to relatively low-confidence (&lt; 2.5) records correspond to species that require further investigation and may be integrated after inspection to ensure high-quality species records.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Confidence Scoring Procedure for eDNA Metabarcoding Records and Its Application to a Global Marine Fish Dataset\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Polanco F.,&nbsp;Romane Rozanski,&nbsp;Virginie Marques,&nbsp;Martin Helmkampf,&nbsp;David Mouillot,&nbsp;Stéphanie Manel,&nbsp;Camille Albouy,&nbsp;Oscar Puebla,&nbsp;Loïc Pellissier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is changing the way biodiversity is surveyed in many types of ecosystems. eDNA surveys are now commonly performed and integrated into biodiversity monitoring programs and public databases. Although it is widely recognized that eDNA records require interpretation in light of taxonomy and biogeography, there remains a range of perceptions about how thoroughly records should be evaluated and which ones should be reported. Here, we present a modular procedure, available as an R script, that uses a set of five steps to assess the confidence of species-level eDNA records by assigning them a score from 0 to 5. This procedure includes evaluations of the known geographic distribution of each taxon, the taxonomic resolution of the marker used, the regional completeness of the reference database, the diversification rate, and the range map of each taxon. We tested the procedure on a large-scale marine fish eDNA dataset (572 samples) covering 15 ecoregions worldwide, from the poles to the tropics, using the <i>teleo</i> marker on the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal gene. Our analysis revealed broad variation in the average confidence score of eDNA records among regions, with the highest scores occurring along the European and Eastern Atlantic coasts. Generalized linear models applied to record covariates highlighted the significant influences of latitude and species richness on low confidence scores (&lt; 2.5). The polar regions notably displayed high proportions of low confidence scores, probably due to the limited completeness of the regional reference databases and the taxonomic resolution of the <i>teleo</i> marker. We conclude that only records with high confidence scores (&gt; 2.5) should be integrated into biodiversity databases. The medium (2.5) to relatively low-confidence (&lt; 2.5) records correspond to species that require further investigation and may be integrated after inspection to ensure high-quality species records.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70077\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境DNA元条形码正在改变多种生态系统生物多样性的调查方式。eDNA调查现在被普遍执行并整合到生物多样性监测计划和公共数据库中。虽然人们普遍认为,eDNA记录需要根据分类学和生物地理学进行解释,但对于记录的评估应该如何彻底以及哪些记录应该报告,仍然存在一系列的看法。在这里,我们提出了一个模块化的程序,可作为一个R脚本,它使用一组五个步骤来评估物种水平的eDNA记录的置信度,给它们分配一个从0到5的分数。该程序包括评估每个分类单元的已知地理分布、所使用标记的分类分辨率、参考数据库的区域完整性、多样化率和每个分类单元的范围图。我们使用线粒体12S核糖体基因上的远距标记,在覆盖全球15个生态区域的大型海鱼eDNA数据集(572个样本)上测试了该方法。我们的分析显示,不同地区的eDNA记录的平均置信度得分存在很大差异,欧洲和东大西洋沿岸的得分最高。用于记录协变量的广义线性模型突出了纬度和物种丰富度对低置信度分数的显著影响(< 2.5)。极区低置信度分数的比例较高,这可能与区域参考数据库的完整性和远距标记的分类分辨率有限有关。我们得出结论,只有高置信度分数(> 2.5)的记录才应该被整合到生物多样性数据库中。中等(2.5)至相对低置信度(< 2.5)的记录对应需要进一步调查的物种,检查后可进行整合,以确保高质量的物种记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Confidence Scoring Procedure for eDNA Metabarcoding Records and Its Application to a Global Marine Fish Dataset

A Confidence Scoring Procedure for eDNA Metabarcoding Records and Its Application to a Global Marine Fish Dataset

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is changing the way biodiversity is surveyed in many types of ecosystems. eDNA surveys are now commonly performed and integrated into biodiversity monitoring programs and public databases. Although it is widely recognized that eDNA records require interpretation in light of taxonomy and biogeography, there remains a range of perceptions about how thoroughly records should be evaluated and which ones should be reported. Here, we present a modular procedure, available as an R script, that uses a set of five steps to assess the confidence of species-level eDNA records by assigning them a score from 0 to 5. This procedure includes evaluations of the known geographic distribution of each taxon, the taxonomic resolution of the marker used, the regional completeness of the reference database, the diversification rate, and the range map of each taxon. We tested the procedure on a large-scale marine fish eDNA dataset (572 samples) covering 15 ecoregions worldwide, from the poles to the tropics, using the teleo marker on the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal gene. Our analysis revealed broad variation in the average confidence score of eDNA records among regions, with the highest scores occurring along the European and Eastern Atlantic coasts. Generalized linear models applied to record covariates highlighted the significant influences of latitude and species richness on low confidence scores (< 2.5). The polar regions notably displayed high proportions of low confidence scores, probably due to the limited completeness of the regional reference databases and the taxonomic resolution of the teleo marker. We conclude that only records with high confidence scores (> 2.5) should be integrated into biodiversity databases. The medium (2.5) to relatively low-confidence (< 2.5) records correspond to species that require further investigation and may be integrated after inspection to ensure high-quality species records.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信