Donald L. Gilbert, Deana Crocetti, Paul S. Horn, Steve W. Wu, David A. Huddleston, Jacqueline M. Ehrman, Karlee Y. Migneault, Stewart H. Mostofsky
{"title":"在有注意缺陷/多动障碍的儿童中,在反应抑制期间运动皮层的任务相关上调较少","authors":"Donald L. Gilbert, Deana Crocetti, Paul S. Horn, Steve W. Wu, David A. Huddleston, Jacqueline M. Ehrman, Karlee Y. Migneault, Stewart H. Mostofsky","doi":"10.1002/cns3.20101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset (“START”: 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go (“GO”: 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop (“STOP”: 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"3 1","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.20101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, less task-related up-modulation of motor cortex during response inhibition\",\"authors\":\"Donald L. Gilbert, Deana Crocetti, Paul S. Horn, Steve W. Wu, David A. Huddleston, Jacqueline M. Ehrman, Karlee Y. Migneault, Stewart H. Mostofsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cns3.20101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset (“START”: 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go (“GO”: 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop (“STOP”: 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Child Neurology Society\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"26-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.20101\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Child Neurology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.20101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.20101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究的目的是确定一种定量的、基于大脑的测量方法,以反映注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的反应抑制受损。在这项横断面研究中,我们使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)在简单的反应时间和反应抑制任务中激发手部肌肉的电位,在8- 12岁的儿童中,41名ADHD儿童(42%的女孩,76%的白人,平均年龄10.3岁)和38名正常发育的对照组(53%的女孩,74%的白人,平均年龄9.8岁)。我们使用诱发电位振幅的混合模型线性回归来比较(1)任务开始(“START”:行动前550 ms)时运动皮层的兴奋性;(2)行动准备(“GO”:行动前150毫秒);(3)停止选择(“STOP”:停止提示后150ms)。我们假设,与任务相关的运动皮层兴奋性上调(运动诱发电位振幅)取决于任务(STOP > GO >; START)和诊断(对照组>;患者)。结果停止组的运动皮质上调明显大于继续组和开始组。ADHD患儿的反应抑制表现较差(停止信号反应时间较长),且运动皮层上调的任务效应明显减弱。运动皮层激活的最大诊断差异发生在STOP试验中。停药期间下调上调也与父母评价的较高症状严重程度相关。我们的研究结果表明,通过经颅磁刺激间接评估的运动皮层兴奋性上调反映了反应抑制任务中的认知负荷,可能是ADHD儿童反应抑制受损的定量、基于大脑的指标。
In children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, less task-related up-modulation of motor cortex during response inhibition
Objective
The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset (“START”: 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go (“GO”: 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop (“STOP”: 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients).
Results
Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity.
Interpretation
Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.