采用模糊集定性比较分析方法确定坦桑尼亚分散式卫生系统良好运行的条件

M. Baroudi , S. Maluka , P. Kamuzora , M. San Sebastián , A.N. Kapologwe , A.K. Hurtig
{"title":"采用模糊集定性比较分析方法确定坦桑尼亚分散式卫生系统良好运行的条件","authors":"M. Baroudi ,&nbsp;S. Maluka ,&nbsp;P. Kamuzora ,&nbsp;M. San Sebastián ,&nbsp;A.N. Kapologwe ,&nbsp;A.K. Hurtig","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Decentralization has been a prominent strategy to enhance health systems’ efficiency, service quality, autonomy and accountability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Tanzania since the 1990s. Previous studies have mainly focused on assessing how much power for decision-making on different health system functional areas is granted to local-level authorities from the central government and the interconnections between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability mechanisms. Empirical evidence on its impact on performance remains limited. This study investigates conditions for good performance in a decentralised health system of Tanzania.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyse the necessary and sufficient conditions for good health system performance. Eighteen purposively districts were chosen to capture variations in performance and geography in a multiple case study approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Functional Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) emerged as a necessary condition for good performance. To achieve good performance, however, there is a need for functional decision space among managers or high accountability among managers or high capacity of staff/ okay level of staffing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores the importance of the interplay between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability in improving health system performance. While decentralization aims to provide greater autonomy, effective implementation depends on the development of local capacities and oversight through accountability. Decentralization alone is not sufficient to enhance healthcare delivery; HFGCs and their local context that promote (social) accountability are essential. Further research is warranted to identify interventions supporting HFGCs in fulfilling their mandates and enhancing health service delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to identify conditions for good performance in the decentralized health system of Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"M. Baroudi ,&nbsp;S. Maluka ,&nbsp;P. Kamuzora ,&nbsp;M. San Sebastián ,&nbsp;A.N. Kapologwe ,&nbsp;A.K. Hurtig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Decentralization has been a prominent strategy to enhance health systems’ efficiency, service quality, autonomy and accountability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Tanzania since the 1990s. Previous studies have mainly focused on assessing how much power for decision-making on different health system functional areas is granted to local-level authorities from the central government and the interconnections between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability mechanisms. Empirical evidence on its impact on performance remains limited. This study investigates conditions for good performance in a decentralised health system of Tanzania.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyse the necessary and sufficient conditions for good health system performance. Eighteen purposively districts were chosen to capture variations in performance and geography in a multiple case study approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Functional Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) emerged as a necessary condition for good performance. To achieve good performance, however, there is a need for functional decision space among managers or high accountability among managers or high capacity of staff/ okay level of staffing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores the importance of the interplay between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability in improving health system performance. While decentralization aims to provide greater autonomy, effective implementation depends on the development of local capacities and oversight through accountability. Decentralization alone is not sufficient to enhance healthcare delivery; HFGCs and their local context that promote (social) accountability are essential. Further research is warranted to identify interventions supporting HFGCs in fulfilling their mandates and enhancing health service delivery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM - Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM - Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪90年代以来,权力下放一直是坦桑尼亚等低收入和中等收入国家提高卫生系统效率、服务质量、自主性和问责制的一项重要战略。以往的研究主要集中在评估中央政府在不同卫生系统功能领域向地方政府授予了多少决策权,以及决策空间、组织能力和问责机制之间的相互联系。关于其对业绩影响的实证证据仍然有限。本研究调查了坦桑尼亚分散式卫生系统良好绩效的条件。方法采用模糊集定性对比分析方法,分析卫生系统良好运行的充分必要条件。有目的地选择了18个地区,通过多案例研究方法来捕捉表现和地理上的变化。结果功能性卫生设施管理委员会(HFGCs)的成立是良好绩效的必要条件。然而,为了实现良好的绩效,需要管理人员之间的职能决策空间或管理人员之间的高问责制或员工的高能力/良好的人员配备水平。结论本研究强调了决策空间、组织能力和问责制在改善卫生系统绩效中的相互作用的重要性。虽然权力下放的目的是提供更大的自主权,但有效的执行取决于地方能力的发展和通过问责制进行监督。仅靠权力下放不足以加强医疗服务;氢氟碳化物及其促进(社会)问责的当地环境至关重要。有必要进行进一步的研究,以确定支持HFGCs履行其职责和加强卫生服务提供的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to identify conditions for good performance in the decentralized health system of Tanzania

Background

Decentralization has been a prominent strategy to enhance health systems’ efficiency, service quality, autonomy and accountability in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Tanzania since the 1990s. Previous studies have mainly focused on assessing how much power for decision-making on different health system functional areas is granted to local-level authorities from the central government and the interconnections between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability mechanisms. Empirical evidence on its impact on performance remains limited. This study investigates conditions for good performance in a decentralised health system of Tanzania.

Methods

We used fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyse the necessary and sufficient conditions for good health system performance. Eighteen purposively districts were chosen to capture variations in performance and geography in a multiple case study approach.

Results

Functional Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) emerged as a necessary condition for good performance. To achieve good performance, however, there is a need for functional decision space among managers or high accountability among managers or high capacity of staff/ okay level of staffing.

Conclusion

The study underscores the importance of the interplay between decision space, organizational capacity, and accountability in improving health system performance. While decentralization aims to provide greater autonomy, effective implementation depends on the development of local capacities and oversight through accountability. Decentralization alone is not sufficient to enhance healthcare delivery; HFGCs and their local context that promote (social) accountability are essential. Further research is warranted to identify interventions supporting HFGCs in fulfilling their mandates and enhancing health service delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信